Switch Theme:

No going back while playing with pals  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in pl
Fresh-Faced New User




Hi,

I don't let people do things they forgot to do. Like, when you forgot to move an unit and shot with something - no goin' back, no "may I juuuust move this one little unit". Nope. I don't like dwelling on details too long either, so if we'd play and we couldn't agree on something, I'd just roll the dice and get over it. Go on, keep playing, that's my motto.

My problem is: bf told me it's uncool. No sportsmanship. That I look bitchy. I got nice pair of twins, so eventually he forgets about it, sure. But still.

From my point of view it's fair. I don't go back, you don't go back.

What do you guys think?
   
Made in gb
Elite Tyranid Warrior




Boobies aside, it's very unsporting. Don't get me wrong, in a tournament setting it's a perfectly acceptable approach because you're there to win and you're playing strictly by the rules and against the clock, but during casual games with friends I've allowed people to go back and cast the psychic power they forgot, or roll in the reserves that slipped my mind, it's just fair play and good sportsmanship.
Some of my friends are still learning the ropes of 6th ed because they don't get much opportunity to play, or they're playing a new codex, they really should be allowed the opportunity to stumble through it while they're relative rookies. I guess there's less of an excuse for 6th ed veterans but I still say be a sportsman and not a Hitler, but that's just me, I'm a nice guy :-)
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

Your BF is right.

We all forget things. letting your opponent move something after they have shot with 1 unit is sporting.

Not letting your opponent remove a unit when he has completed his assault phase is fine though.

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in nz
Disguised Speculo





I only play like this if for whatever reason we're running short of time.

Otherwise, very bad sportsmanship, unless you ok it with the other guy first. If you don't, it'd be enough to make me look for a different opponent.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/05 07:35:52


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Not really a rule lawyering situation as this comes down to personal choice of whom you are playing against and yourself the moment you find yourself in it.

That being said, I do not see anything overly wrong with allowing slight adjustments. What you need to remember over all is this is a game and people want to have fun. The behavior of your opponents is part of the enjoyment and one demanding strict adherence to timing is not a fun opponent to play against. Not only that, it is not something humans are very good at for the most part so it makes a innocent oversight into a fun-breaking experience faster then nothing else.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/06/05 07:42:33


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





St. Louis, MO

I'll give someone I don't know some leeway, but between my friends and I, we prefer not to do tapbacks if for no other reason than to give us a better reason to remember and pay better attention next time.

11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die.
++

Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
 
   
Made in fr
Swift Swooping Hawk






Both are valid. I allow it but that's because I play pretty casual games with friends.
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






I think that as long as you are clear about it from the start, then it shouldn't be a problem.

To counter your boyfriend's point, it's also not particularly sportsmanlike to expect your opponent to bend the rules for you. If you want a "take back", then you should be prepared that your opponent has every right to say "no".

Personally, I'm pretty easy on it with my opponents, though I try to be as strict about it for myself as possible. Everyone gets tired and forgets things, everyone gets distracted by something (boobs), and everyone suffers from brain farts at times. I would rather win by tactics and luck than by being out-brainfarted by my opponent.
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

Yeah, the key is just to make sure that both players have the same expectation. Neither approach is inherently more sporting... Letting them go back is certainly more relaxed, though.

For myself, in a casual game I have no problem with allowing an opponent to go back and do something he forgot, so long as it doesn't mess up other things that have happened since.

But then, I'm generally ok with that in a tournament game against a friendly opponent, too...

 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Buffalo, NY

I have no problem with it as long as you haven't gone on into a new phase. If you forgot to cast a blessing and you already started moving units, I'll allow it. If you forgot to cast a blessing and you already started shooting - it's too late.

Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia 
   
Made in fi
Confessor Of Sins




Hime wrote:
My problem is: bf told me it's uncool. No sportsmanship. That I look bitchy.


Well, it does depend on the situation.

Some things are required by the rules, such as reserve rolls - if you remember your opponent has units in reserve (and he doesn't) I'd certainly expect you to remind him. Same goes for "always on" special rules you know his units have - they can't actually choose not to use them even if he forgets. Or weapon characteristics that aren't optional, such as Ordnance rolling two dice for armor penetration and picking the higher. It's no longer bad sportsmanship if you don't remind him, it's outright cheating.

Some things aren't required, and there it's perfectly fine not to say anything. If your opponent moves off an objective on turn five or doesn't move that one free unit into your deployment zone for Linebreaker it's his problem. It would be good sportsmanship to remind him, but in a tournament with cash prizes I wouldn't expect it.
   
Made in gb
Proud Phantom Titan







Going back to move a unit you forgot or shoot that gun or pile in... well rules are quite simple you don't.

Now that's not saying i wont give some one some slack over this but really its something that you have to do. Its a key mechanic people have to learn.

My rule of thumb if I'm playing against a kid or new player he'll get advice and can do things he forgot. (There's a lot going on its only fair to cut them some slack while learning). If the player is more experienced then I expect them to play like that ... ok he for got to move his big unit I'll let him ... once or twice. Pro players ... tough you should know what your doing only time you get to go back and do something is when i want it (forgotten reserves for example).



   
Made in us
Douglas Bader






IMO, assuming we aren't playing with prizes at stake:

If the mistake is forgetting something and it's caught before anything depending on it can happen I'll probably allow my opponent to go back and do it. For example, if they forget to move a unit, roll to-hit with their first shooting, and realize they forgot to move.

If the mistake is doing something that, in hindsight, you wish you had done differently then forget it. For example, if you miss all of your shots with your melta guns and then "forget" that you didn't move your lascannons out of cover for a good shot then no, I'm not going to let you do it. And if you "forget" that you wanted to do something differently right after a unit rolls badly then you're TFG.

(Example of the second case: my opponent forgot to cast a psychic power that was a pretty obvious auto-cast, I decided to let them go back and cast it since they caught it early in their movement phase. They rolled perils and suddenly were all in favor of playing RAW and not being allowed to go back and cast a power.)

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/05 09:16:37


There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
Made in pl
Fresh-Faced New User




Thanks for all comments!

Okay, so from now on I will just mention how I like to play before the game. That's fair enough I think.

About that "rookie needs some leeway" thing, I concur. However that is valid for like three games, then you gotta learn. I play for only like a year, so I'm still learning myself (and got new codex just when I thought I knew my old one, yay!). I best memorize things that "hurt", for example: forgot to "fortune" Eldrad, got eaten by terminators. Hurts, but now I a l w a y s remember to cast my powers.

I'll try to be more relaxed though. The fact that I don't allow myself to ask for things doesn't mean it should be so for all, isn't it? I just don't wanna people think I try to play "that dumb girl" act. My mistakes, my problem, period.

But, using boobs is part of my Eldar trickery tactic! Distraction and pathfinders won me some tough games!

P.s. You're all so nice O_o

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/05 09:26:56


 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






Hime wrote:
Distraction and pathfinders won me some tough games!


Distracting your opponant IRL wins 40k games?

I'll bear that in mind.

For my next game, I'm now going to drag dress as daisy duke. Cut off's, cowboy boots and a crop top.

That should cause some distraction. Possibly some panic.

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





 Cheexsta wrote:
To counter your boyfriend's point, it's also not particularly sportsmanlike to expect your opponent to bend the rules for you. If you want a "take back", then you should be prepared that your opponent has every right to say "no".


I really agree with this. It cuts both ways, expecting to be allowed to cheat isn't very sporting either.

That said, I'm usually ok with a certain amount of out-of-sequence actions, as long as whatever needs to be done isn't tied too closely with things that already happened or was bleedingly obvious that the unit would have done whatever was forgotten. But only to a point - I will draw the line if you've taken several mulligans. Eventually you have to wear the disadvantage of forgetting things!
   
Made in gb
Lesser Daemon of Chaos





Hampshire, uk


People forgetting to move flyers is one i wont let them undo.

Never let your enemy know they are making a mistake.

Latest Blog Post: 7th edition first thoughts and pictures.

 
   
Made in us
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer




Charleston, SC

People forgetting to move flyers is one i wont let them undo.


Don't flyers have to move a certain distance? Is this not cheating? Unless of course they are in hover mode.

 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






 cerbrus2 wrote:

People forgetting to move flyers is one i wont let them undo.

Never let your enemy know they are making a mistake.


With non hover fliers, they have to move 18" - does this mean you make them auto crash?

I'll let them make mistakes tactically - like assaulting the 'wrong' unit or shooting the 'wrong' unit, but I point out where they are making actual rules mistakes - whether they're advantageous to me or not.

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator






The Midlands

To add another point to this, who would allow someone to change their mind about a unit they have moved.

I quite often will move a unit to a position and then change my mind, moving them back or to a new position. I would always ask before I do so, and would carefully measure out so they know I'm not cheating. But out of interest how many people would allow me to do it, even in a tournament scene?

I accept that if I have moved onto the next phase then it's too late and I won't even try - unlike your BF - but what if I'm still in that phase?

 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






Then its still your turn and premeasuring is fine - as long as if you moved a unit, you go back to where you started from.

No one I've ever played has claimed this is chess and as soon as you take your finger off your unit you're done.

Although, Its a different thing altogether when somone measures something, moves, can't reach where they want, goes back and measures again and somehow they're in the perfect position now...


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest





Stevenage, UK

For me it largely depends on how important the difference is. If it's turn 1 shooting phase and you've forgotten to move up a unit, sure, go for it.
If it's turn 5 and you forgot to declare a charge on an objective before starting another combat - sucks to be you...!

"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch  
   
Made in nz
Disguised Speculo





 phantommaster wrote:
To add another point to this, who would allow someone to change their mind about a unit they have moved.

I quite often will move a unit to a position and then change my mind, moving them back or to a new position. I would always ask before I do so, and would carefully measure out so they know I'm not cheating. But out of interest how many people would allow me to do it, even in a tournament scene?

I accept that if I have moved onto the next phase then it's too late and I won't even try - unlike your BF - but what if I'm still in that phase?


I can't see how this could possibly be an issue except against the most horrid, WAAC powergamer scum. And even then, just tell them to feth off and move your unit again.
   
Made in gb
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle





There is a line, but in general I think it is poor sportsmanship to say no. So is distracting people...

For example, if the move would have an effect on something else, then no. If, say, the unit might have ended up giving cover to another unit that has shot, no.

On the other end of the scale you have someone dose there move, shoots at one end of the table with one unit and says "Oops... I just realized I didn't move that unit I forgot was in that building at the other end of the table". No problem with that.

I know one person who dose refuse these, and I will not play against him. I have some short term memory and organizational problems and it really takes the fun out of the game when things like that are used against you.

 insaniak wrote:
Sometimes, Exterminatus is the only option.
And sometimes, it's just a case of too much scotch combined with too many buttons...
 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




In my opinion, asking someone to let you not follow the rules is far more unsportsmanlike, and then complaining that they did't let you, far bitchier. Having to remember to do things in the right order helps you learn not to forget to do things.
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

Hime wrote:
I'll try to be more relaxed though. The fact that I don't allow myself to ask for things doesn't mean it should be so for all, isn't it? I just don't wanna people think I try to play "that dumb girl" act. My mistakes, my problem, period.


I am guessing that most people would rather play a more relaxed opponent, than one that is more uptight. So good for you!

But, using boobs is part of my Eldar trickery tactic! Distraction and pathfinders won me some tough games!

Pics or it didn't happen!

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Your BF is dead on. Furthermore I play in GT's and RTT's and I almost always allow my opponent to go back and do something they forgot especially if it is something that they would very obviously do. People get excited sometimes and forgetful other times. In addition, (there is no nice way to say this) if you need your opponent to forget things and then beat him over the head with it, I really question your ability as a gamer if you are required to hamstring your opponent like that to win.
   
Made in de
Ork Admiral Kroozin Da Kosmos on Da Hulk






I know some people (most of them two-digit veterans), who won't let people redo forgotten moves/shooting/powers/whatever no matter what. However, all of them will refuse any offer to redo something they have forgotten during their game(unless they were mandatory anyways). Being veterans doesn't exactly make them forget less things, usually quite the opposite. It's just the way they like to play, I think one should respect that.

Personally, I ask people whether they buffed/moved/shot/assaulted everything when they start moving/shooting/assaulting/rolling combats. That resolves the issue 90% of the time. In addition few people ask to redo forgotten things if you explicitly asked them a few minutes before.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/05 15:24:53


7 Ork facts people always get wrong:
Ragnar did not win against Thrakka, but suffered two crushing defeats within a few days of each other.
A lasgun is powerful enough to sever an ork's appendage or head in a single, well aimed shot.
Orks meks have a better understanding of electrics and mechanics than most Tech Priests.
Orks actually do not think that purple makes them harder to see. The joke was made canon by Alex Stewart's Caphias Cain books.
Gharkull Blackfang did not even come close to killing the emperor.
Orks can be corrupted by chaos, but few of them have any interest in what chaos offers.
Orks do not have the power of believe. 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Your BF is neither wrong nor right. It is his opinion.

Honestly if you are consistent with how you play, meaning "you practice what you preach."

Then I would consider that fair and sporting.

A pre-game discussion to set all the expectations should be all that is needed.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.

I let people correct mistakes at tournaments, but then I don't take this game as seriously as some people do.

Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: