Stronger - Hordes or WarMachince?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**J0kerrMT**

So which armies are generally stronger? Hordes are WarMachine?

What are the benefits or drawbacks of each?

**darefsky (Flight Medic Paints)**

Dude, seriously just do a forum search, this has been asked and answered probably about 50-60 times already and usually about twice a month.

Without getting into to much detail. WM/H is a balanced game. Hordes tends to be beast heavy, WM tends to be infantry heavy. Fury vs Focus is always debatable.

**tdwg83**

J0kerrMT wrote:
So which armies are generally stronger? Hordes are WarMachine?

What are the benefits or drawbacks of each?

In general, I don't think there is a winner. However, Warlocks are stronger earlier in the game where you have more beast to generate fury, warcasters are stronger later in the game where their focus is less divided.

**infinite_array**

darefsky wrote:
Dude, seriously just do a forum search, this has been asked and answered probably about 50-60 times already and usually about twice a month. .

He's asked this question. Already. Multiple times.

**reds8n**

It's probably worth having a read around and possibly coming back with more specific or focused questions.

As it is the topic is somewhat large and open to debate to answer sensibly.