Switch Theme:

Space Marine Hailstorm Tank  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





The Hailstorm is a Space Marine tank created by the Purgators Chapter as an anti-infantry powerhouse. Using the versatile Rhino chassis, it trades its transport capacity for a pair of Hurricane Bolter Sponsons and reinforced Frontal Armour.

Hailstorm Assault Tank
BS Frontal Side Rear
4 13 11 10

Type: Tank

Wargear: Two Hurricane Bolters

Options:
May take a pintle-mounted Heavy Flamer or Multi-Melta for +15pts
All other options as per the Space Marine Codex for the Predator (Don't have the most recent edition)

So this is a tank designed for taking down Tyranids. It's not subtle, and it's not pretty, but it does the job well. The Multi-melta was added by the Purgators when taking the Hailstorm to other warzones, specifically as a way to take out other vehicles before dousing their occupants with thousands of bolter rounds.

As for points, I would think similar to a Predator Destructor. What say you, Dakkanauts?

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Buffalo, NY

Changing an STC? The Mechanicum will not be happy.

As a Tyranid player it doesn't seem that OP, especially since the things that would be attacking it would be MCs or mid-range shooting.

Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia 
   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





Eh, the Blood Angels and Space Wolves do it all the time. The Purgators never had much time for the Mechanicum- they nicked a forge world from them for a reward for saving it from the Emperor's Children, and never looked back.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Buffalo, NY

This tank is clearly designed for horde armies. If your opponent is running Nidzilla, it's in trouble. I'm not saying that this is bad, Just that it would not be as threatening.

Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia 
   
Made in hu
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot





 4oursword wrote:

As for points, I would think similar to a Predator Destructor. What say you, Dakkanauts?


Nah, 50 points should be enough for it. It can only use its full firepower if it remains stationary and 2x3 TL boltguns are not really that scary. Definitely feels underpowered IMHO. Maybe add special issue ammo and make it 80-90 points? Or even add Fast and make it 90-100 points?

My armies:
14000 points 
   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





Although, I'm not sure of the points for a Predator Destructor in this edition. Fast is a Blood Angels thing, so I wouldn't want to encroach there. Special Issue would make it more versatile, so that might be cool.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in us
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





Upstate, New York

A rhino with no passenger capacity and AV13 front is a predator. What role does this tank fill that a Auto/HB "Dakka" pred can't? That pred costs 95 point in the new codex.

Now if you want hurricane bolters on an AV13 chassis, take them as an option for sponsons. The stormraven pays 30 points to add them, which is 10 more then the HBs on a pred. I'm not familiar with what BAs pay to put a flamestorm cannon in the turret, but you might want to look into that.

Special ammo is suposed to be rare. I don't see it being issued in the quantities to load up a hurricane bolter with it.

   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





 Nevelon wrote:
A rhino with no passenger capacity and AV13 front is a predator. What role does this tank fill that a Auto/HB "Dakka" pred can't? That pred costs 95 point in the new codex.

Now if you want hurricane bolters on an AV13 chassis, take them as an option for sponsons. The stormraven pays 30 points to add them, which is 10 more then the HBs on a pred. I'm not familiar with what BAs pay to put a flamestorm cannon in the turret, but you might want to look into that.

Special ammo is suposed to be rare. I don't see it being issued in the quantities to load up a hurricane bolter with it.


Auto/HB is more suited to Heavy Infantry. Plus, boltgun rounds aren't going to be in short supply for a Space Marine chapter- it's a salvage situation.
Now that you mention it, Special Issue ammo sounds like a bad fit.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in za
Fixture of Dakka




Temple Prime

Even if you absolutely spammed these things, they wouldn't put out enough shots to really put a dent in a big fat blob of termagants, cultists, guardsmen, kroot, or boyz in cover. Have a top mounted hurricane bolter set too if you're deadset on this unit. 18 bolter shots at 12' still isn't totally amazing but it'd be getting close to the amounts of dakka you'd want for the job.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/02 21:21:26


 Midnightdeathblade wrote:
Think of a daemon incursion like a fart you don't quite trust... you could either toot a little puff of air, bellow a great effluvium, or utterly sh*t your pants and cry as it floods down your leg.



 
   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





Adding a top-mounted one removes the modular nature of space marine tanks. I imagine the sponsons were looted from a destroyed LRC, or a downed SR.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in za
Fixture of Dakka




Temple Prime

 4oursword wrote:
Adding a top-mounted one removes the modular nature of space marine tanks. I imagine the sponsons were looted from a destroyed LRC, or a downed SR.

Put at least an option for a turret mounted hurricane bolter, because as it stands this thing is pretty sucky. It's basically six marines, except not as durable to a lot of things. And can't score. And can't use it's full firepower if it moves.

 Midnightdeathblade wrote:
Think of a daemon incursion like a fart you don't quite trust... you could either toot a little puff of air, bellow a great effluvium, or utterly sh*t your pants and cry as it floods down your leg.



 
   
Made in us
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





Upstate, New York

 Kain wrote:
 4oursword wrote:
Adding a top-mounted one removes the modular nature of space marine tanks. I imagine the sponsons were looted from a destroyed LRC, or a downed SR.

Put at least an option for a turret mounted hurricane bolter, because as it stands this thing is pretty sucky. It's basically six marines, except not as durable to a lot of things. And can't score. And can't use it's full firepower if it moves.


IIRC there are no hurricane bolters mounted in turrets. So from a salvage/slapping something together POV, it makes no sense to have one there.

But if this is an ad-hoc field conversion, I don't see where the AV13 is coming from. That's full tank toughness. If you want to base off of a rhino, you should stick with the rhino's armor, crummy though it is. Or better yet, use a razorback. Stick with one of the free turret options (TLHB, TLHF) and trade the cargo capacity for the sponsons. So instead of having 6 guys hop out and double-tap, you have the hurricanes doing it. Maybe bump the price up 10-20 points. Sure, it's fragile, but if you are worried about the kind of soft targets bolters work on, you don't need full tank armor. The kind of weapons those targets tend to bring to the fight are claws, rocks, and harsh language. AV 11 front/sides should be fine for that.

   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





The armour was just extra plates, maybe taken from the same Land Raider they nabbed the sponsons from? It could be bumped down to 11, though.

Hmm. I'm not too fond of the idea of a turret- I like the image I have in my head of a very squat vehicle. Nonetheless, it's worth consideration.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/03 16:29:32


Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in gb
Hallowed Canoness





Between

The image of a rhino chassis with sponsons and no turret is pretty awesome - my own Infernus Assault Vehicle was based on the same idea (with Heavy Flamer sponsons rather than Hurricane Bolters).

As it stands, I'd price this about the same as a tactical squad and give it a unique spot in the Marine TO&E by making it either Squadronable or allow it to be taken in the same manner as a Dedicated Transport.

As for the extra frontal armour on an emergency refit, the answer is obvious. It's not an up-gunned Rhino, it's a salvaged Predator whose turret was destroyed. Either that or you can put a Siege Shield on the front - the most recent rules for the Repressor make it an FAV13 rhino, where previously it was just a FAV11 Rhino that automatically passed DT tests.

So, yes. My suggestion: 40 points, with the following amendment to the Tactical, Devastator and Veteran squad entries:

The unit may take a Dedicated Transport from the following list:
- Rhino...............35 points
- Razorback......65 points (or whatever a HB razorback costs)
- Hailstorm........50 points

Because they no longer include the rule that a squad has to be able to fit in its dedicated transport, you don't need to make special dispensation for a vehicle with no transport capacity.

For reference on the pricing: The Repressor is 70 points for a standard rhino with FAV13, a pintle-mounted heavy flamer and a dozer blade.



"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. 
   
Made in us
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





Upstate, New York

 4oursword wrote:
The armour was just extra plates, maybe taken from the same Land Raider they nabbed the sponsons from? It could be bumped down to 11, though.

Hmm. I'm not too fond of the idea of a turret- I like the image I have in my head of a very squat vehicle. Nonetheless, it's worth consideration.


Well, it's not like the razorback turrets are particularly high-profile. And from the look at their website, the FW ones are even lower. (Take that with a grain of salt, not seen one in person.) And once you slap the hurricanes on the side, the center of mass of the whole thing is going to get lower, adding to the squat look.

At the end of the day it's your home-brew, so you need to be happy with it. And make sure the gang you play with is fine with it as well.

   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





Hmm, thanks guys! What do you think of the option for it to have pintle-mounted Multi-melta or Heavy flamers? I'm erring away from it myself.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
Made in us
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





Upstate, New York

Only LRs get pintle MMs, and nobody in the army gets pintle HFs. They are a bit out of character for a rhino chassis. If you want some extra punch, stick with the classic vehicle upgrades, SBs or HKs.

   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





It might be worth looking into something like the weapons the Land Raider Prometheus wields, TL-Heavy Bolters on sponsons.

The increased range would help, in that you wouldn't have to choose between moving up close enough to shoot, or shooting, resulting in decreased efficiency for both.

The tradeoff would be decreased shots (two TL-Heavy bolters is 6 shots vs. 12 shots w/ Hurricane), but you could also allow for turrent mounted TL heavy bolters. Call it a Hailstorm Bolter, and make it 2TL HBs. I imagine it'd look something like: http://cdn.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Gears-of-War-3-turret-2.jpg sitting on top of a rhino. Still fairly low to the ground, and gives you 12 shots total at 36". The downside is you probably wouldn't get a Pintle weapon.
   
Made in gb
Hallowed Canoness





Between

The pintle heavy flamer or multi-melta is fine if it's just one, but the other cupola should be restricted to standard upgrades, I think. There's precedent for the single pintle flamer or melta, after all, but two will not only push it into the realms of heavy support, but will go over the standard Imperial restriction of top weapon + sponsons or hull-mounted, plus possibly storm bolter.



"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. 
   
Made in gb
Preacher of the Emperor





The precedent is why I thought this would work well. Obviously, the pintle flamer is on the repressor, but it looked cool and I could see a Space Marine tank crewman using one to deal with enemies that get just a bit too close for comfort.

I agree that it should be just one, and one or the other. That makes sense.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.


Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: