Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Frankenberry wrote:
Pay to win, still don't get how that's a valid argument. That's like bitching about every upgrade ever made to anything. "Oh, instead of using my hand to wipe, I have to buy this new butt-paper? Pfft. Pay-to-wipe, so unfair to us traditionalists."

No, it's like bitching that you need to buy new releases to counter new releases. If you think there's no problem with this, you obviously haven't played games outside of Games Workshops products. That's fine and all, but saying it isn't an issue is pretty naive.

You are also terrible at analogies, because that makes no sense. Maybe go research how an analogy is meant to work?

I realized that after I posted it that I was trying to convey something entirely beyond what I'd meant to, sorry about that.

Thought I knew what analogies were, apparently not! So, ignore what I posted, lol.

Anyhow, you're right.

 Frankenberry wrote:
I realized that after I posted it that I was trying to convey something entirely beyond what I'd meant to, sorry about that.

Thought I knew what analogies were, apparently not! So, ignore what I posted, lol.

Anyhow, you're right.

OMG! Did you just concede an argument without getting upset and attacking him personally or just say something rude? Dakka losing its edge.

You sir must be some type of Dakka forum saint.

 Frankenberry wrote:
I realized that after I posted it that I was trying to convey something entirely beyond what I'd meant to, sorry about that.

Thought I knew what analogies were, apparently not! So, ignore what I posted, lol.

Anyhow, you're right.

You were dangerously close to xruslanxing the thread with analogies about poop! Kudos to you for admitting you error, though