Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Prestor Jon wrote: Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent.
Smacks wrote: Should playing football even be considered a real job?
Yes.
Unless by football he really means "soccer" because he's british afterall...
I listen to a ton of sports radio (yeah, i paid a bunch to get XM, but of my favorite stations, they seem to enjoy playing crap i dont like, so i listen to sports, which pisses me off more), and the basics of the situation is that US Federal law says a man cannot lose his job over taking up to a certain amount of paternity leave. MLBPA, in their collective bargaining aggreement "waived" that and "grant" their players 3 days at the players' discretion of paternity leave.
I think that most of these places get that a new family is a huge deal in anyone's life, and it makes baseball or football or whatever sport just that much less important.
I also didn't hear the exact comments that Boomer made, but they really are quite barbaric, and not with the times at all. It's odd coming from him, considering he has a special needs kid IIRC. There was some talk on ESPN (notably, Mike and Mike) that Boomer may have meant to say induce rather than c-section, but the point really is, he was out of line with the way things work now.
Do soldiers get to come home from war for these things? And what do they get paid?
Depends on the unit honestly. If a soldier is in a great unit, yes. If he is in a good unit, it depends on which child it is (1st, 2nd, etc), and it should be pretty obvious if he's in a not good unit.
And, depending on rank we get paid gak... or depending on how you look at it, we get paid gak for what we're asked to do at our specific level.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/05 01:59:22
Smacks wrote: How about the right to gang rape unconscious college girls?
How about you post the relevant United States labor law that makes the gang rape of unconscious college girls a right.
Or you could just continue to post stupid stuff...
DutchWinsAll wasn't talking about labour laws, he was talking about privileges afforded to college footballers, that regular people don't get. This happens so often, it might as well be written into their contract. Here are some examples:
University of Notre Dame, 1974: An undergraduate accused six Fighting Irish players of rape. A university administrator called the woman, who later spent a month in psychiatric care, a "queen of the slums with a mattress tied to her back." No charges were filed.
Notre Dame, 1976: Two of the Notre Dame players accused in 1974, along with one other player, were accused of rape by a 17-year-old student. "I was told to shut up and mind my own business," a witness to the assault later told the National Catholic Reporter's Melinda Henneberger. The witness, a resident advisor at nearby St. Mary's College, had been informed by administrators that one of the players had been involved in another unreported rape, in addition to the previous 1974 incident. No charges were filed.
University of Colorado, 1989: Twenty-four Buffaloes were arrested in a three-year span under coach Bill McCartney for everything from rape to illegally skinning a rabbit. Another former player, linebacker Miles Kusayanagi, was accused of being "the Duct-Tape Rapist," responsible for eight sexual assaults in Boulder. (He was convicted on four counts of first-degree sexual assault.) McCartney told a local news reporter that another alleged rape by one of his players couldn't have been rape because it wasn't violent enough. Besides, he told Sports Illustrated, it could be worse: "You'll notice that we haven't had anybody shoot anybody."
University of Oklahoma, 1989: Three players were arrested and two convicted of raping a female student in a dorm room. Nigel Clay, one of the two players convicted of rape, told the Los Angeles Times in 1992: "Well, speaking for myself and a lot of other people, we felt like we were above the law…like OU would protect us from anything." Head coach Barry Switzer resigned, but was hired six years later as head coach of the Dallas Cowboys.
University of Nebraska, 1993: Defensive lineman Christian Peter's punishment for being convicted of third-degree sexual assault? He was put on probation and missed one exhibition game. Peter, a future NFL draft pick, was accused by two other women of sexual assault during his time on campus and arrested a total of eight times for a range of offenses. Kathy Redmond, one of Peter's accusers, received threatening phone calls and had her car vandalized for reporting the assault. (Peter's teammate, Lawrence Phillips, was suspended for physically assaulting his girlfriend, but was reinstated by Cornhuskers head coach Tom Osborne in time to play in the 1995 national title game.) Osborne went on to serve three terms in Congress. Peter was inducted into the Nebraska Football Hall of Fame in 2006.
Florida State, 1994: Kicker Scott Bentley was sentenced to 40 hours of community service for illegally recording a woman having sex. "This should serve as a clear message to our football players that this behavior and mistreatment of women will not be tolerated," said head coach Bobby Bowden, upon announcing that Bentley would be suspended for the summer but keep his scholarship and miss no games. Within a two-week period that spring, a Seminoles running back was accused of exposing himself to a woman while walking across campus, and a tight end was charged with rape (for which he was acquitted).
Virginia Tech, 1994: Freshman Christy Brzonkala ran into a wall of obstruction when she told administrators she had been raped by two Virginia Tech football players. The school, which was investigating her claims, dropped charges against one player after he threatened to sue because the school's code of conduct did not explicitly forbid sexual assault. His only penalty was a "one-hour educational session"—with the accuser. The other player was suspended for a year—only to have the suspension dropped before football season started. A campus spokeswoman publicly chided Brzonkala (who transferred) for coming forward six months after the incident. She sued the school under the Violence Against Women Act, only to see the relevant portion of the law struck down in federal court.
Idaho State University, 1995: Four Bengals football players were sentenced to community service and one-year of probation for statutory rape.
Appalachian State University, 1997: A female student alleged she had been raped by six football players, but the school's judicial board downgraded their offenses to "lewd conduct." One player was suspended from school; one was cleared; and the rest were placed on probation, allowing them to eventually return to the football team. ASU Chancellor Francis Borkowski's message to students that year: "If you are not in control of your life through indulgence in alcohol and drugs, then you are setting yourself up."
Colorado, 1997: No charges were filed by Boulder police after a woman alleged she was raped by a football recruit at a party, because witnesses were deemed too inebriated to be trustworthy. Boulder district attorney Mary Keenan later told the New York Times the incident was a consequence of ''an ugly football subculture.''
Louisiana State University, 1998: Star running back Cecil Collins was dismissed from the team after being accused of two sexual assaults in two weeks (the first was of a minor). He was sentenced to probation. That didn't stop another football program, McNeese State, from offering him a full scholarship, or the Miami Dolphins from drafting him. "Charming and likable, he has, nonetheless, seen his collegiate football career derailed by sexual assault charges and failed drug tests," the Sun-Sentinel reported in 1999. His career ended in 2001, when he was convicted of breaking into a woman's home to watch her sleep.
Oklahoma State University, 1999: Stillwater police asked a female student who accused four football players of rape to immediately sign a form stating that she would not press charges—just hours after coming forward. She filed a federal lawsuit two years later, eventually settling with the players, two of whom went on to play in the NFL.
United States Naval Academy, 2000: Three football players were accused of raping a female midshipman who passed out at an off-campus party. They avoided prosecution in exchange for leaving the academy.
University of Florida, 2000: Offensive line recruit Jason Respert was accused of breaking into a female student's bedroom and sexually assaulting her, but the charges were reduced to trespassing and simple battery. He did 40 hours of community service and went on to accept a full scholarship at the University of Tennessee.
Colorado, 2001: A female student alleged she was raped repeatedly by Buffaloes football players at an off-campus party for recruits. "It certainly is not the best timing," said a school vice president, noting that the team was trying to prepare for the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl. Others blamed the victim. "There is also no question in my mind that the behavior of the 10 young people involved was the result of their own poor decisions under the influence of alcohol," head coach Gary Barnett said later—alluding to not just the football players and their recruits, but the three alleged victims.
University of Washington, 2001: After accusing a Huskies star of rape, university officials suggested that a female student sit down for one-on-one mediation with her alleged rapist instead of calling the cops. Although a jury later ruled in the school's favor three years later, its members had harsh words for school administrators in interviews with the Seattle Times. "When asked Thursday how the UW handled the case, one juror said: 'You want a quote? Piss poorly.'"
Notre Dame, 2002: A female student alleged that she was raped by three football players and one former member of the team. All were eventually expelled, but not before the school tried to dissuade the victim from pressing charges and prevented her from receiving counseling, according to the National Catholic Reporter. Safety Abram Elam, who served no prison time after being convicted of sexual battery, later enrolled at Kent State and went on to a seven-year career in the NFL.
Colorado, 2004: After former kicker Katie Hnida told Sports Illustrated she was repeatedly sexually assaulted by teammates, head coach Gary Barnett said she was sore about her shortcomings as a football player: "It was obvious Katie was not very good. She was awful. You know what guys do? They respect your ability. You can be 90 years old, but if you can go out and play, they'll respect you. Katie was not only a girl, she was terrible. OK? There's no other way to say it. She couldn't kick the ball through the uprights." In another incident, a female student told police that Barnett threatened to support his player "100 percent" if she came forward with her rape allegation. Barnett was briefly suspended, but returned to the team for another season. He was fired at the end of the 2005 season—for ending the season on a three-game losing streak. He took a $3 million buyout.
Brigham Young University, 2004: Four players were indicted and two players sent to trial in the gang rape of a fellow student. Although a teammate testified against them at the trial, the players were acquitted. In The System: The Glory and Scandal of College Football, Jeff Benedict and Armen Keteyian offered one reason why: "After the courtroom cleared out, three jurors were still around. Kelly [the prosecuting attorney] cornered them and asked why they had acquitted. 'The jury said they had suffered enough,' Kelly said. 'They lost their scholarships. They were kicked off the team.' Kelly said it was the most bizarre thing she'd ever heard—the idea that the players had been sufficiently punished when they lost their opportunity to play football. 'That's the power of college football,' she said."
Arizona State University, 2004: A female student working as a tutor for a summer program for football students sent an email to her supervisors about a freshman recruit: "I don't want to get raped in college and that is what Darnel [Henderson] makes me feel like when he is around me." By the end of the summer, ESPN reported, Henderson had been accused of sexually assaulting women in his dorm and exposing himself to female staffers. When confronted, his response was to tell a staff member that he felt he had to "show [women] their place." The university's response was to bow to head coach Dirk Koetter's request that Henderson keep his scholarship. When Henderson was accused of rape by a different student a year later, ASU police mysteriously waited three weeks to interview him despite deciding internally that Henderson was probably guilty. A university administrator accompanied Henderson to his meeting with investigators, and when the case was submitted to Maricopa County, the district attorney declined to pursue the case. ASU administrators, meanwhile, tried to destroy incriminating evidence—like the fearful email. Koetter, who sought to get Henderson a scholarship to another top-tier college football program, was fired two years later because he couldn't consistently beat top-25 opponents.
University of Tennessee-Chattanooga, 2005: Six Mocs football players were charged with raping a student. But head coach Rodney Allison let the players take the field against West Carolina University before informing Chancellor Roger Brown the players would be suspended. Brown said he was told the players had broken curfew. The charges were eventually thrown out.
University of Montana, 2010: Public records revealed that top administrators sought to cover up allegations that four football players had raped a female student. Vice President James Foley tried to punish the accuser under the school's code of conduct and instructed colleagues to refer to the incident as a "date rape" instead of a "gang rape." In separate incidents, a star quarterback and running back were both accused of rape. (The running back was later convicted; the quarterback continued practicing with the team after being charged, but was found not guilty.*) Athletic Director Jim O'Day showed reporters photos of a woman who had been bit by a star cornerback accused of sexual assault in an attempt to show them that it wasn't that bad. He was ultimately terminated with a full year's pay.
Notre Dame, 2010: "Messing with Notre Dame football is a bad idea," a friend of a football player texted Lizzy Seeberg, after she accused a Fighting Irish player of rape. Shortly thereafter, Seeberg took her life. The university president refused to meet with Seeberg's family after her death and school officials tried to smear her in the press. Another woman, who was taken to the hospital for a rape exam later that year, declined to file a complaint after receiving threatening texts from Notre Dame players. Head coach Brian Kelly, who chided a Chicago reporter for covering the story, took the team—and the two accused assailants—to the national championship game.
Pennsylvania State University, 2011: Jerry Sandusky.
United States Naval Academy, 2012: A female midshipman accused two football players of sexually assaulting her at an off-campus party. The accuser was disciplined for underage drinking, but the two football players were allowed to play the 2012 season. The female student is also required by academy rules to attend every home game that year. During the eventual Article 32 hearing, in which both players are court-martialed, the accuser is grilled on her oral-sex technique.
Vanderbilt University, 2013: Four Commodores players were charged with raping an unconscious woman in a player's dorm room. One player transferred to Alcorn State University, before being kicked off that team too because of developments in the Vanderbilt case, which is ongoing. In mid-November, Vanderbilt students filed a federal complaint alleging that the university had turned a blind eye to sexual assault on campus.
None of which has anything to do with labor laws or parental leave, especially so considering that none of these actions were by employees, and none of their actions are anything that they are granded by law.
If you have beef with athletes and crap they get away with, then by all means start a "this is why athletes suck" thread.
So far your posts have been nothing but off-topic and they just appear trollish with "I think people should have to actually talk about stuff so instead of talking about stuff I'm just going to post a one word answer and then refuse to talk about it" and "Amateur athletes at the college level get away with crap, so professional athletes shouldn't get to follow labor laws."
None of which has anything to do with labor laws or parental leave.
As I clearly said, DutchWinsAll wasn't talking about labour laws. You responded to him, I responded to you.
"I think people should have to actually talk about stuff so instead of talking about stuff I'm just going to post a one word answer and then refuse to talk about it"
I wasn't the one initially posted a one word answer. I just responded to a one word answer in kind. That is not trolling.
"Amateur athletes at the college level get away with crap, so professional athletes shouldn't get to follow labor laws."
Is misrepresenting what other people say the only thing you know how to do? It's certainly all I ever see you do.
College athletes do get away with crap, this is an established fact.
That has nothing to do with labour laws, it was just a side point that seemed to need spelling out for you. These people ARE privileged.
And I never said adults shouldn't be allowed labour laws. In fact I have already said that they absolutely should, unless they have a different kind of contract.
I feel like you are the one trolling me now. Why not missquote me again? I can't wait to hear what you have next. Will start with the word "So" and end in a question mark, and contain none of my actual points? As per usual.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/04/05 02:47:20
Smacks wrote: I wasn't the one initially posted a one word answer. I just responded to a one word answer in kind. That is not trolling.
You said you posted a one word answer because you felt that people should have to talk about their answers.
But you neither talked to the person that gave the initial answer, and you said you didn't have to talk about your answer to anybody else.
I don't have to misrepresent what you say, you do a fine job of misrepresenting your statements yourself.
So far all I get from your statement is that athletes don't actually have jobs and shouldn't be considered employees because college athletes sometimes rape people and they are priviledged.
If you want to actually clarify it better than that and make some sense then please try harder.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/05 02:55:28
Smacks wrote: I wasn't the one initially posted a one word answer. I just responded to a one word answer in kind. That is not trolling.
You said you posted a one word answer because you felt that people should have to talk about their answers.
But you neither talked to the person that gave the initial answer, and you said you didn't have to talk about your answer to anybody else.
I have talked about it for two pages, and had to put up and defend myself from you trying to belittle me every other post, because I asked if football should be considered a real job (like working in an office), or if it is a different kind of contract. An example might be performers who are paid to appear at festivals and concerts.
So far all I get from your statement is that athletes don't actually have jobs and shouldn't be considered employees because college athletes sometimes rape people and they are priviledged.
See there you go again. Even though I spelled out for you in my previous post how I feel about labour laws (I even underlined it, I don't see how it can be any more clear). Here it is again from the front page...
Smacks wrote: It is about being an 'employee'. If they are then they are, and should have all the same rights.
If they signed some other contract then they shouldn't. It really depends what they signed up for, or are willing to accept to play their game professionally.
I'm done with conversation anyway. I admit that sometimes I might take and unusual stance and play devils advocate, but I resent being called things like stupid and troll. I am neither.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/04/05 03:29:31
I also didn't hear the exact comments that Boomer made, but they really are quite barbaric, and not with the times at all. It's odd coming from him, considering he has a special needs kid IIRC.
Yeah, his son has cystic fibrosis and he founded a charity dedicated to curing CF and improving the quality of life of sufferers.
I have talked about it for two pages, and had to put up and defend myself from you trying to belittle me every other post, because I asked if football should be considered a real job (like working in an office), or if it is a different kind of contract. An example might be performers who are paid to appear at festivals and concerts.
If your standard of what constitutes a "real job" is whether or not a person works in an office, then pretty much any blue collar job wouldn't be "real".
Truthfully, I think you need to back away from the notion of a "real job" because it is not communicative, and makes you look prejudiced against athletes, the self-employed, and blue collar workers.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/04/05 20:07:19
Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh.
dogma wrote: If your standard of what constitutes a "real job" is whether or not a person works in an office, then pretty much any blue collar job wouldn't be "real".
Truthfully, I think you need to back away from the notion of a "real job" because it is not communicative, and makes you look prejudiced against athletes, the self-employed, and blue collar workers.
Thanks Dogma, I really appreciate your matter-of-fact honesty, and I think you're absolutely right... "real job" was a poor choice of words, and has made my position untenable in this thread. No matter how much I back-peddle or try clarify, I'm just going to get hounded and polarize people against me, because of earlier hamfisted statements. which is why I'd really like to just bow out now. I should have chosen my words more carefully, so they would have been easier to defend (or wouldn't need defending at all). I feel bad that I came off prejudiced, I'm not, and I'm actually self employed myself (which is kind of how I got into this).
@ d-usa, I'm sorry if I was rude to you. It won't happen again. And I'm sorry to anyone else that I might have annoyed.
I feel the only case that can be made for why athletes might not be entitled to Paternity leave would be if someone could show that they are not employees of the clubs, but have a different form of contract and relationship. For example: a self-employed player contracted to the club might not be entitled to anything he didn't negotiate for.
I'm not sure what the real situation is, but everyone else seem fairly united in the notion that players are unequivocally 'employees'. As employees they would have to be legally entitled to take paternity leave like everyone else. That's probably /thread, as I can't see anyone stepping in to try and argue for mandatory C-section. I certainly don't want anything to do with that whatsoever...
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/04/05 23:37:23
Part of the issue might be how sports are fundamentally set up differently in the US and Europe in general and the UK in particular. I know in Germany there are a ton of amateur athletes that play club soccer competitively, probably more than professionals. So I would imagine that Germans have a different mindset of playing competitively and being an amateur vs employee than people in the US, and the situation in the UK might be similar to that.
I do agree with you that professional athletes (and the semi-pro college players) get away with a ton of crap and that it is a problem, it's just another thread in my opinion.
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
d-usa wrote: Why not? Because they get paid a lot?
Being a professional sports player is a job, yes. But the fact that it is a highly paid job in which the handful of people who are good enough to work in the field are extremely sought after, allowing them to make all kinds of demands of employers that the rest of us could never dream of makes it very different to other jobs.
Consider, for instance, a CEO of a multinational who earned $10 million a year and has share schemes and all sorts of other benefits on top of that, who said his contract didn't allow for parental leave and so he had to use up some of his annual leave to be at the birth of his child. I'd laugh at his complaint, and I suspect you would as well, because we know if the CEO had wanted that clause he would have negotiated for it, and just lost some other benefit in exchange. The pro athlete is no different - once he's in a position to negotiate a contract worth a lot of money, well then he's in a position to negotiate for parental leave if he's willing to give up some other benefit.
Other sports where pay is very modest would be different, of course.
The negotiating power of a pro-athlete is vastly different to the negotiating power of a someone working the checkout at Walmart.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Smacks wrote: There are sportsmen like George Best who were notorious for skipping practice. There is a story of him not turning up for a whole week while he went frolicking with the then Miss Great Britain. And he often got away with that stuff because as long as he was scoring goals and drawing big crowds what can anyone do? A team is not going to cut a star player over some disciplinary BS.
The world of professional sport has changed a lot since George Best played.
These days it is not uncommon for highly talented players to be left out of the team for not training hard enough, or failing to follow their scheduled food programs, let alone failing to turn up to training.
The high performance programs athletes get put on these days are crazy, but part of what it takes to be a couple of % better than the other guys.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
d-usa wrote: All employees get the same rights, even the gakky fathers working at McDonalds.
Actually lots of people are considered big enough and powerful enough to look out for themselves. The contracts written up for employees in all kinds of specialist skill industries remove basic protections that regular workers get, and that is okay because by definition an employee in enough demand to command a really high wage and specialist conditions of his own is not vulnerable to being exploited in the way that a regular working schlubb is vulnerable.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/04/08 02:12:02
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
d-usa wrote: Why not? Because they get paid a lot?
Being a professional sports player is a job, yes. But the fact that it is a highly paid job in which the handful of people who are good enough to work in the field are extremely sought after, allowing them to make all kinds of demands of employers that the rest of us could never dream of makes it very different to other jobs.
Consider, for instance, a CEO of a multinational who earned $10 million a year and has share schemes and all sorts of other benefits on top of that, who said his contract didn't allow for parental leave and so he had to use up some of his annual leave to be at the birth of his child. I'd laugh at his complaint, and I suspect you would as well, because we know if the CEO had wanted that clause he would have negotiated for it, and just lost some other benefit in exchange. The pro athlete is no different - once he's in a position to negotiate a contract worth a lot of money, well then he's in a position to negotiate for parental leave if he's willing to give up some other benefit.
Other sports where pay is very modest would be different, of course.
The negotiating power of a pro-athlete is vastly different to the negotiating power of a someone working the checkout at Walmart.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Smacks wrote: There are sportsmen like George Best who were notorious for skipping practice. There is a story of him not turning up for a whole week while he went frolicking with the then Miss Great Britain. And he often got away with that stuff because as long as he was scoring goals and drawing big crowds what can anyone do? A team is not going to cut a star player over some disciplinary BS.
The world of professional sport has changed a lot since George Best played.
These days it is not uncommon for highly talented players to be left out of the team for not training hard enough, or failing to follow their scheduled food programs, let alone failing to turn up to training.
The high performance programs athletes get put on these days are crazy, but part of what it takes to be a couple of % better than the other guys.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
d-usa wrote: All employees get the same rights, even the gakky fathers working at McDonalds.
Actually lots of people are considered big enough and powerful enough to look out for themselves. The contracts written up for employees in all kinds of specialist skill industries remove basic protections that regular workers get, and that is okay because by definition an employee in enough demand to command a really high wage and specialist conditions of his own is not vulnerable to being exploited in the way that a regular working schlubb is vulnerable.
Negotiating away basic labor rights and protections is one thing, and people are free to do that if they truly think that their total compensation and benefits make up for it. That's not my issue. My issue is if people think that some people might think that people who don't work a "real" job, or make "too much", or "whatever" shouldn't get those rights and protections to begin with.
People should never be denied the same basic rights and protections as any other laborer just because some of us might think that their jobs are different enough from normal people. People can be free to negotiate their rights and protections below the minimum if they feel that they have justified reason to do so. The choice should be with the employee.
I'm not sure how much players get to negotiate beyond salary. Unlike CEO's there is a players Union and some things are boilerplate that all players receive.
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
d-usa wrote: Negotiating away basic labor rights and protections is one thing, and people are free to do that if they truly think that their total compensation and benefits make up for it.
Well, it depends. Negotiating away basic rights when you're a minimum wage staff member is very problematic, because it's so easy to 'negotiate' a really gak deal under pressure of losing your job.
But when you're on pro-athlete kind of money, are highly sought after by a range of competing firms and have personal sports management, I don't see the problem.
My issue is if people think that some people might think that people who don't work a "real" job, or make "too much", or "whatever" shouldn't get those rights and protections to begin with.
I agree with you there.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ahtman wrote: I'm not sure how much players get to negotiate beyond salary. Unlike CEO's there is a players Union and some things are boilerplate that all players receive.
I don't know the split between where the union stops and individual contracts take over. I know in AFL over here there's a union that has a range of benefits, including insurance for players who suffer career ending injury and stuff like that, and boiler plate contracts for individual players for young players and players on the fringes, but beyond that there's a massive amount of scope for players to sign individual contracts with all sorts of added payment options and requirements.
But the point is that we're not talking about the Cleaners & Caulkers Local 35 we're talking about here. The only limitation on big money pro-athletes getting coverage for parental leave is if they want it enough to make it a negotiating point.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/08 04:37:34
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
Ahtman wrote: I'm not sure how much players get to negotiate beyond salary. Unlike CEO's there is a players Union and some things are boilerplate that all players receive.
Not to mention that very few professional athletes are given exceptional treatment within their league, especially early in their careers. For every Alex Rodriguez or Kobe Bryant, there are a couple dozen no-name guys will be lucky to get a contract above the league minimum; and most of these guys are almost totally subject to the whims of their coaches and GMs.
Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh.