Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2014/04/25 15:16:29
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
More than three in four Tea Party supporters (78 percent) have never attended a rally or donated to a group; most have also not visited a Tea Party Web site.
Well gak guys, get it together. I'm not a Tea Party member and I've been to rallies to see what was up.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/25 15:18:34
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
2014/04/25 15:16:48
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: "He doesn't sound like a black guy" vs. "black people are aborting kids and are lazy and don't have any goals because we quit keeping them as slaves".
If you can't see a difference there it is only because you don't want to see it.
One's quite racist, one's even more racist.
"He doesn't sound like a black guy," is some good water-carrying for, "He speaks with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one," by the way.
You will notice I did some "good water-carrying" for both sides by using black instead of negro.
And I have yet to say that one is not racist. I am saying that one is so much more racist that it is stupid to even try to compare the two or to say that the more racist one is okay because somebody else said that the negro talks good.
2014/04/25 15:33:43
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
I don't know about that one specifically, but I could believe it. I've seen some pretty dumb protestor signs in my limited time
It also makes sense from the perspective of the Tea Party. As Seaward showed, many Tea Partiers are older, so we can assume some are on Medicare and the ACA kicked up around that same time.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/25 15:37:59
LordofHats wrote: I don't know about that one specifically, but I could believe it. I've seen some pretty dumb protestor signs in my limited time
It also makes sense from the perspective of the Tea Party. As Seaward showed, many Tea Partiers are older, so we can assume some are on Medicare and the ACA kicked up around that same time.
Seaward also showed they make more than average, so while Medicare's a possibility, welfare seems dubious.
2014/04/25 15:43:45
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
It would be nice to try and get the thread on track. I've got a gutsy feeling that Mr. Bundy has more insights to share with us, I'd like to discuss them here, and the off-topic comments, while obviously useful for those who wish us to concentrate elsewhere (anywhere else) , only serve to get the thread locked (again)
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
2014/04/25 15:44:37
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
Yeah but the thing that makes the statement funny is that is says government shouldn't be using medicare money for welfare socialized medicine, ignoring that medicare is welfare socialized medicine. EDIT: Sorry sidetracking myself.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/04/25 15:46:27
LordofHats wrote: I don't know about that one specifically, but I could believe it. I've seen some pretty dumb protestor signs in my limited time
It also makes sense from the perspective of the Tea Party. As Seaward showed, many Tea Partiers are older, so we can assume some are on Medicare and the ACA kicked up around that same time.
Seaward also showed they make more than average, so while Medicare's a possibility, welfare seems dubious.
Well, I'm sure none of them ever got any kind of welfare or government handout or government program...
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ouze wrote: It would be nice to try and get the thread on track. I've got a gutsy feeling that Mr. Bundy has more insights to share with us, I'd like to discuss them here, and the off-topic comments, while obviously useful for those who wish us to concentrate elsewhere (anywhere else) , only serve to get the thread locked (again)
True true...
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/04/25 15:47:55
2014/04/25 15:48:02
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: Well, I'm sure none of them ever got any kind of welfare or government handout or government program...
Are we moving the goalposts from "welfare" to "any government program" already?
They're the same thing. People have simply convinced themselves they're not to justify taking government handouts when it suits them and pretend they're different from the lazy layabouts who want free money/stuff.
LordofHats wrote: They're the same thing. People have simply convinced themselves they're not to justify taking government handouts when it suits them and pretend they're different from the lazy layabouts who want free money/stuff.
They're really not, is the thing. There's quite a difference between, say, TANF and social security benefits.
2014/04/25 15:54:59
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
Medium of Death wrote: It's probably not a photoshop if this video is any kind of indicator. This was posted in a thread from many months back.
It's the natural result of everything good about the whole mess being labeled "ACA" while everything bad about it being labeled "Obamacare". Even if you haven't seen it occur in the media, you can tell from their consistent responses throughout the video.
A cynical person might think that was not by accident.
Ouze wrote: It would be nice to try and get the thread on track. I've got a gutsy feeling that Mr. Bundy has more insights to share with us, I'd like to discuss them here, and the off-topic comments, while obviously useful for those who wish us to concentrate elsewhere (anywhere else) , only serve to get the thread locked (again)
Cliven Bundy Racism Exposes The “Cattle Battle” Fraud
After weeks of spouting off about land rights and the constitution Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy popped the cork on the racism bubbling right beneath the surface of his stand – off with the federal government. And in barely a few hours everyone on the right wing from Senators to political pundits who days ago called him a ‘hero’ have been running from him faster than a stampede from a brush fire. Which is telling, because Bundy’s racial beliefs should have nothing to do with the validity of his protests. But his words, and the rapid evaporation of his support from the political and pundit class shows that racial animus was always at the heart of this entire conflict.
During a recent press conference with a few reporters Bundy decided to get philosophical about “The Negro”
I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.
“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
I bet Solomon Northrup would disagree. Now to be fair, he had plenty of nice things to say about Hispanics, but I think the die has already been cast. Bundy’s attitude is not surprising for a man of his race and age. More importantly his belief that African Americans were happier, more noble, thrifty, hard working or responsible, in some mythical past time period (when discrimination against African Americans was legal, and socially acceptable) has been echoed by various other public figures in the last year from celebrity chef Paula Deen, Duck Dynasty Star Phil Robertson and most recently by former Republican VP pick Paul Ryan (R-WI) . However, Bundy being a racist should have no bearing on whether or not you believed in his claim that the federal government had no authority to actually require him to pay grazing fees. Unless of course you’re a racist too and Bundy’s rant just blew the cover off of your covert rant against Obama.
Cliven Bundy, like George Zimmerman, like Phil Robertson, like Paula Deen is a dog whistle, a cultural cudgel with which to attack the United States, and specifically the first African American president who sits in the White House. The right wing in America, whether it be Sean Hannity or Alex Jones, realized during the “Birther” debacle that blatantly screaming “There is no way I will suffer the authority of a negro in the White House” gains them no favor with mainstream America. Obama got elected, twice, by a lot of Blacks, Asians, Latinos and whites, and blatantly attacking the president racially is offensive to a good many Americans. However, hiding that racism by championing the actions of undeclared bigots is a perfect veil under which to express hostility towards Obama and African Americans while still retaining plausible deniability.
You think all black teens are thugs and potential criminals, but are afraid to say it out loud, for fear of being exposed as a racist? Just claim you’re a gun rights advocate who strongly empathizes with George Zimmerman. Think African Americans have a degraded ‘culture’ but know what will make a pariah at dinner parties? Say you’re a free speech supporter who stands by Phil Robertson. The list goes on and on. Public, politicians and pundits will support men and women who have done something obviously wrong as a way to launder racial beliefs into something more palatable to the mainstream, at least until the truth gets exposed.
Cliven Bundy’s ‘protest’ against grazing fees has been going on longer than Obama has been in office. However he openly welcomes supporters who view his protest as an act of rebellion against the illegitimate presidency of Barack Obama. If race were not one of the underlying motivations bolstering Cliven Bundy’s actions, why would did he feel the need to go off on some Freudian rant about “the Negro” to begin with? It is impossible to separate Bundy’s protest (and to a lesser extent the government’s tepid response) and his sense of white male privilege. As Chris Hayes pointed out on MSNBC, if a group of Hispanic Americans banded together and threatened INS agents who wanted to deport illegal aliens what do you think would happen? Ask Elian Gonzalez. As Jamelle Bouie pointed out in Slate.com when African Americans defy the law and don’t pay taxes on grounds of moral or historical rights they end up dead in Philadelphia, or in jail like Wesley Snipes. If Cliven Bundy were anything other than white male rancher in Nevada he would’ve been in jail years ago.
So now Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and Sean Hannity know they can’t publicly support Cliven Bundy’s ‘cause’ without being exposed as supporting the racism that undergirds it. Exposed being the key term, since in a couple of months they’ll all find another ‘victim’ to conveniently support. And they will gleefully and disingenuously throw that cudgel at Obama and Black America as well, at least until the next exposure comes along.
Dr. Jason Johnson
It is true... A lot of these 'movements' are racism wrapped up in a consumable package. Lots of the supporters are unwitting or naive pawns being manipulated by people with agendas which no normal person could get behind. You can try to break apart the issue but this whole battle revolves around the concept of "We are white people, things like this shouldn't happen to white people, so let's resort to armed violence!" You can't separate the 'county supremacy' movement from the leaders who are white supremacists and the militias founded under the flag of white supremacy.
My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA."
2014/04/25 16:12:38
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
LordofHats wrote: I seem to remembering saying in the old thread Bundy wasn't going to win this *ego swells*
I think he has been winning so far, though. He's not paying his dues, he's a hero to the folk, and the BLM backed down (granted, for the moment). Frankly if it hadn't been for his extemporaneous dissertation on race in America, I think that political office would be a foregone conclusion.
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
2014/04/25 16:15:45
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he (Cliven Bundy) said.
.
If he would have called them “descendents of slaves” instead of “the Negro”, would it have made any difference?
.
Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.”
.
These three sentences are a totally valid criticism of the government’s policies and social programs … and explains one of the reasons why the “descendents of slaves” haven’t gotten any further ahead in American society, than they have.
.
“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” … he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
.
No one is “better off” being a slave. But the “descendents of slaves” in America today are still in slavery. The difference is today’s “slavery” is much more physically comfortable, than the pre-civil war days.
But it’s still slavery, none the less.
They accept an impoverished standard of living, for free … in exchange for voting Democrat. But the standard of living for inner-city “descendents of slaves” is still impoverished.
.
The “descendents of slaves” living in the inner city have got to learn how to pick cottonwork, or otherwise be productive. And Only then I’ve often wondered, are they will they be better off. as slaves, picking cotton
Worth noting; the same thing goes for the young people living a higher standard of living in suburbia.
If they don’t learn how to do real work, they’ll end up like the inner city people.
LordofHats wrote: I seem to remembering saying in the old thread Bundy wasn't going to win this *ego swells*
I think he has been winning so far, though. He's not paying his dues, he's a hero to the folk, and the BLM backed down (granted, for the moment). Frankly if it hadn't been for his extemporaneous dissertation on race in America, I think that political office would be a foregone conclusion.
After his rant?
Nah... he's going down hard.
EDITED for source...
dammit...
This message was edited 5 times. Last update was at 2014/04/25 16:28:08
Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!
2014/04/25 16:18:09
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
@nkelsch, while I think there's some interesting points in that article, I'd have rephrased it slighty. It's not that overt racism underlies these events, but rather the desire to ardently deny things like privilige exist. It's the bootstraps myth. The taking of individualism and self-reliance to such an extreme it becomes a satire of itself. That makes up a huge bulk of conservative politcs in America. That's the underpinning of it all. It is racist, but its the kind of insititutional racism, not overt racism, that is still commonplace today and that people on one side of politics feel completely dedicated to saying doesn't exist and that racism plays into a much larger picture concern the class debates and wealth inequality.
Regardless of whether or not you think BLM was heavy handed once this thing kicked off;
If Cliven Bundy were anything other than white male rancher in Nevada he would’ve been in jail years ago.
I think this is completely true.
@Ouze. We all know how this is going to end. BLM is gonna wait for the rage to die down, then they're going to rush in and finish the job. Bundy's probably just dug himself a much deeper hole now as his crimes arguably go beyond just refusing to pay his fees and now enter obstruction of justice and inciting a riot.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/25 16:19:58
It's federal land, they can do what they want. My plan for action if I am appointed Czar of Land Management:
1) Declare that all Bundy Cattle Lands are now Military Training Grounds.
2) Initiate Strategic Napalm Exercises.
3) Give everybody in the area 24 hours notice to vacate.
4) Send in the bombers and drop Napalm.
5) Invite everybody over for a BBQ.
2014/04/25 16:28:56
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: It's federal land, they can do what they want. My plan for action if I am appointed Czar of Land Management:
1) Declare that all Bundy Cattle Lands are now Military Training Grounds.
2) Initiate Strategic Napalm Exercises.
3) Give everybody in the area 24 hours notice to vacate.
4) Send in the bombers and drop Napalm.
5) Invite everybody over for a BBQ.
Cool!
Will there be alcohol or is this BYOB?
Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!
2014/04/25 16:31:37
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: It's federal land, they can do what they want. My plan for action if I am appointed Czar of Land Management:
1) Declare that all Bundy Cattle Lands are now Military Training Grounds.
2) Initiate Strategic Napalm Exercises.
3) Give everybody in the area 24 hours notice to vacate.
4) Send in the bombers and drop Napalm.
5) Invite everybody over for a BBQ.
Cool!
Will there be alcohol or is this BYOB?
There will be no government handouts, strictly boot-strap moonshine distilled from the finest Cactus Juice stolen cultivated and maintained for generations.
2014/04/25 16:32:46
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: You will notice I did some "good water-carrying" for both sides by using black instead of negro.
Negro isn't necessarily an offensive term. Organizations like the United Negro College Fund still use it, as did Martin Luther King in his "I have a dream" speech. According the Wikipedia it was still used on the last US census because a lot of people self-identify as Negro.
It does sound a bit antiquated now, but ironically it used to be the more polite term (with "black" being considered a pejorative). That could easily still be the case in whatever backwards place Bundy is from.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/25 16:34:02
2014/04/25 16:34:40
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
d-usa wrote: It's federal land, they can do what they want. My plan for action if I am appointed Czar of Land Management:
1) Declare that all Bundy Cattle Lands are now Military Training Grounds.
2) Initiate Strategic Napalm Exercises.
3) Give everybody in the area 24 hours notice to vacate.
4) Send in the bombers and drop Napalm.
5) Invite everybody over for a BBQ.
Cool!
Will there be alcohol or is this BYOB?
There will be no government handouts, strictly boot-strap moonshine distilled from the finest Cactus Juice stolen cultivated and maintained for generations.
Hmmm... Cacti Moonshine sounds yummy.
You've got a beer making operation... any chance you can tweak it to make some shine?
I've had Dandilion Shine... tasted much better than you'd expect.
Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!
2014/04/25 16:36:30
Subject: Re:Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
But in a contentious interview Friday on CNN's "New Day," Bundy stood by his remarks, saying he's not a racist but only somebody who spoke his mind, perhaps using politically incorrect language.
"Maybe I sinned, and maybe I need to ask forgiveness, and maybe I don't know what I actually said, but when you talk about prejudice, we're talking about not being able to exercise what we think. ... If I say Negro or black boy or slave, if those people cannot take those kind of words and not be (offended), then Martin Luther King hasn't got his job done yet," he told anchor Chris Cuomo on Friday, adding, "We need to get over this prejudice stuff."
Of course it shows how out of touch he is if he thinks that the word "negro" is the problem and not his statement that they were better off as slaves.
Of course the guy doing the interview gave the best advice, which he should have followed from the start:
In one exchange with Cuomo, Bundy said, "I don't know how to talk about these ethnic groups ..."
"Then don't," Cuomo said.
2014/04/25 16:36:35
Subject: Interesting Quote on the Bundy Cattle Case
That could easily still be the case in whatever backwards place Bundy is from.
Unless he's been living under a rock since the 1970's and literally has never watched TV since then, I highly doubt it. While there's an arguable double standard in reactions to that word, I don't think there's any question that Bundy was using it in the way most of us are thinking he was.
I think what he said was racist, but because of the ideas behind what he said, not his specific word usage. I too think the word Negro is archaic and should be avoided because it's obsolete. but in and of itself not racist; especially when coming from a man who grew up when schools were still segregated. I feel the same way about Harry Reid - the problem wasn't the word itself, it was that someone could choose not to sound like one, and that is desirable. So I don't count Mr. Bundy's use of Negro against him, nor anyone else that is approximately 70 years old or older and who grew up in the rural west.
In one exchange with Cuomo, Bundy said, "I don't know how to talk about these ethnic groups ..."
"Then don't," Cuomo said.
Talking out of your ass is the most 'murican of things to do, next to shooting off an AR-15 with one hand while holding an American flag in the other, and the point tip of the flagpole being used to each a cheeseburger, because you only have 2 hands.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/25 16:44:57
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock