Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Of course, the chances of a water feature actually turning up are minimal. I have yet to actually see one in years of playing.
As for odd water-related facts, I'm pretty sure someone ran the maths based on a Forge World book and worked out that if the specifications of the Land Raider were correct, it would actually have low enough density to float! Go figure indeed.
It's odd especially since the only terrain that really gets rules in the new 40k rulebook is terrain specifically made by GW, and none of that features water. Games with rivers and the like are fun though; if you can get some or make some they can definitely make a game interesting. I think the last time I played with someone who got to use that rule was 4th edition.
When you're alternating placing terrain, just plop down a big river or lake on the edge of each deployment zone. It'll protect your backfield and give a good angle of attack for your AFS teams.
"Bringer of death, speak your name, For you are my life, and the foe's death." - Litany of the Lasgun
Paradigm wrote: Of course, the chances of a water feature actually turning up are minimal. I have yet to actually see one in years of playing.
As for odd water-related facts, I'm pretty sure someone ran the maths based on a Forge World book and worked out that if the specifications of the Land Raider were correct, it would actually have low enough density to float! Go figure indeed.
Doesn't surprise me either way. I mean we already have APCs that can float:
Wait, is OP commenting the fluff/rules of the vehicles or the actual physical models?
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia
Paradigm wrote: Of course, the chances of a water feature actually turning up are minimal. I have yet to actually see one in years of playing.
As for odd water-related facts, I'm pretty sure someone ran the maths based on a Forge World book and worked out that if the specifications of the Land Raider were correct, it would actually have low enough density to float! Go figure indeed.
Doesn't surprise me either way. I mean we already have APCs that can float:
It's more the fact that there is fluff of Land Raiders driving along a riverbed to attack a Tau fortress, when, if the maths is right, they would just sort of bob along on the surface like horribly beweaponed rubber ducks.
That and the fact that the armour is apparently several feet think in places, which, if GW could do physics, isn't conducive to floating.
Paradigm wrote: Of course, the chances of a water feature actually turning up are minimal. I have yet to actually see one in years of playing.
As for odd water-related facts, I'm pretty sure someone ran the maths based on a Forge World book and worked out that if the specifications of the Land Raider were correct, it would actually have low enough density to float! Go figure indeed.
Doesn't surprise me either way. I mean we already have APCs that can float:
It's more the fact that there is fluff of Land Raiders driving along a riverbed to attack a Tau fortress, when, if the maths is right, they would just sort of bob along on the surface like horribly beweaponed rubber ducks.
That and the fact that the armour is apparently several feet think in places, which, if GW could do physics, isn't conducive to floating.
I'm going to go test if the Rhino should be amphibious too.
Edit:
If you do not glue the back hatch it is only partially amphibious due to the driver compartment, if you glue the back hatch it is amphibious. Thus modelling for advantage if you glue the back door shut.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/11 10:59:25
We actually had a swamp terrain board that was very well done with streams and islands all over the place made with water effect resin stuff. Was really cool, but is the only time in 20+ years of gaming I have ever seen a use for the Chimera Amphibious rule. The one time I have seen Chimeras on that board it was an 'ard Boyz game and the guy had a simple IG parking lot and never moved while his opponent got so bogged down it was silly.
If you dont short hand your list, Im not reading it.
Example: Assault Intercessors- x5 -Thunder hammer and plasma pistol on sgt.
or Assault Terminators 3xTH/SS, 2xLCs
For the love of God, GW, get rid of reroll mechanics. ALL OF THEM!
So now I am picturing a drunk Andy Chambers and Gav Thorpe tossing random plastic kits into a bathtub for shiggles back in the late 90s...
Emperor's Eagles (undergoing Chapter reorganization)
Caledonian 95th (undergoing regimental reorganization)
Thousands Sons (undergoing Warband re--- wait, are any of my 40K armies playable?)
squidhills wrote: So now I am picturing a drunk Andy Chambers and Gav Thorpe tossing random plastic kits into a bathtub for shiggles back in the late 90s...
Nah, totally Kirby in a bubble bath driving Chimeras around and making pew pew noises.