Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 dogma wrote:

 MrMoustaffa wrote:

Considering how some women I know fight and hold grudges, it would bring about an era of pain and suffering the likes of which would make the Hatfield and McCoy feud look like a friendly disagreement.

Yeah, the fact that women are relatively less aggressive than men has as much to do with gender norms as it does genetics. Take those norms away and I guarantee there would be no appreciable decline in global violence.

No, Dogma. Women are much more peaceful than men. They never fight with each other ever. Your post reminded me of this brutality. Probably NSFW due to violence, but there is no gore, blood, or nudity.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c06_1406352280

 jasper76 wrote:
Ridiculous article aside, lemme make a wild guess. You guys don't eat ice cream very often.

WTF, I love ice cream. My favorite is Haagen Dazs strawberry.

 Swastakowey wrote:

 jasper76 wrote:
Ridiculous article aside, lemme make a wild guess. You guys don't eat ice cream very often.

I love Ice Cream too much. Seriously, I dont buy it now because I cant stop eating the stuff. Its like a drug to me. My partner hates it because we are now (finally) an ice cream free household. I dont get how it relates to a story that should be a crazy novel and not someones personal opinions though

The thing about ice cream is if you don't eat it, you start to hate it. And you start to hate the misguided souls in the world who think that all there is to life is eating ice cream, and that ice cream should be the only food anyone should ever eat in the world. The truth is there should be steak, and salad, and ice cream too. Ice cream is delicious, and I don't care what health professionals say, it's good for you. If you stop hating ice cream, and be friendly enough to your local ice cream dealers, eventually , you will find one that will sell you ice cream, and trust me, it will open a whole new world of deliciosity to your life. But first, you have to be respectful to your ice cream dealer. Treat them like fellow human beings, and eventually one will sell you a cone. But if all you can say to your ice cream dealer is rude and denigrating, you'll more than likely never get any ice cream.

It's a beautiful world of all kinds of flavors of ice cream. Just be nice to your ice cream dealer, and you will find out.

And I'm only talking here to the ice cream haters, not the ice cream lovers.

--from a currently drunken ice cream lover

 Slarg232 wrote:
Hmmm, Death, or Death by Snu Snu?

"The spirit is willing but the flesh is spongy and bruised"

The whole world will end up like some (even) freakier version of Dr Moreau's island….. this bit of the article made me chuckle "Nothing says “peace” quite like genital mutilation, eugenics, and murder. Oh, and slavery. There’s slavery, too."

Although I'm sure that a planet dominated by women will work just fine. After all, women have been credited with inventing Chocolate Chip Cookies, Nystatin, The Circular Saw, The Dishwasher (I gak you not), oh and Kevlar…. See? Everything you could possibly need for a brave new world!

 trexmeyer wrote:
Your post reminded me of this brutality. Probably NSFW due to violence, but there is no gore, blood, or nudity.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c06_1406352280

What I love about this is that no one stops to help until the guy comes in and stops the five on one, then a few get involved to have him stop. I also like that the guy the stopped the 5 on 1 went full Zap Rowsdower on them, and didn't treat them like they were children.

trexmeyer wrote:

 dogma wrote:

 MrMoustaffa wrote:

Considering how some women I know fight and hold grudges, it would bring about an era of pain and suffering the likes of which would make the Hatfield and McCoy feud look like a friendly disagreement.

Yeah, the fact that women are relatively less aggressive than men has as much to do with gender norms as it does genetics. Take those norms away and I guarantee there would be no appreciable decline in global violence.

No, Dogma. Women are much more peaceful than men. They never fight with each other ever. Your post reminded me of this brutality. Probably NSFW due to violence, but there is no gore, blood, or nudity.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c06_1406352280

View the patriarchy in action. How dare that sexist, misogynist pig use physical violence to assert power over those poor, defenseless, women. Him stepping in to defend the woman on the ground was really just his way of using physical violence to remove her agency, denying her status as a person and effectively rendering her nothing more than an object. His attack on the other women was his way of asserting his male privilege and communicating that the woman on the ground, as an object, is his to protect, rather than their's to deface. Due to the binary nature of the patriarchal, cisgender-dominated system that has socially conditioned this man, he is unable to view the woman on the ground as an individual, but can only see her through the lens of objectification; to wit, his perception must be that she either belongs to the five women who are defacing her, or she belongs to him. Because of this, the destructively sexist culture that we live in virtually requires that men such as this one utilize violence to assert ownership over objectified women. Something something, the male gaze. Something something, feminism.

Ahtman wrote:

 trexmeyer wrote:
Your post reminded me of this brutality. Probably NSFW due to violence, but there is no gore, blood, or nudity.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c06_1406352280

What I love about this is that no one stops to help until the guy comes in and stops the five on one, then a few get involved to have him stop. I also like that the guy the stopped the 5 on 1 went full Zap Rowsdower on them, and didn't treat them like they were children.

A bit more serious now: I actually found that part extremely disturbing. Everyone else was content to sit by and let it happen until that guy actually did something, and then they all stood up to stop him. Maybe if someone had done something a bit sooner, he wouldn't have had to have gotten involved at all.

 ZebioLizard2 wrote:
..Have these people never heard of female war leaders? Like Boudicca of the Celts?

Or even just Wikipedia?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_ancient_warfare

Or Maggie Thatcher, or Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. She seems to like threatening war with the UK every time her popularity starts to wain. I'm sure I could find more, but anyone who thinks a world with female leaders would be less violent is an idiot. It would make FA difference.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 trexmeyer wrote:


No, Dogma. Women are much more peaceful than men. They never fight with each other ever. Your post reminded me of this brutality. Probably NSFW due to violence, but there is no gore, blood, or nudity.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c06_1406352280

Reminds me of this advert... http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u3PgH86OyEM

That's the world we live in now courtesy of white knights and deranged feminists. Not all feminists are deranged, but far too many exist. It's almost funny that people wonder why the MRM exists or believe that it is entirely pointless.

Does the wage gap exist? To some extent, yes. Is it as great as claimed? Not remotely close.
Do divorce laws treat men and women equally? No.
I stand by my opinion that laws concerning pregnancy and child support are unjust and excessively punitive against males. That's not even getting into the issue that men have zero say in the abortion of their child. At least in America it's not as extreme as some countries. In France you can not legally have DNA testing done as a male to confirm the child is even yours.

Physical, emotional, and mental abuse by women against men is completely ignored. The man is expected to take it because he is bigger and stronger. By that logic a larger man should also accept being abused by a smaller male simply on the basis he won't be hurt as badly. God forbid defend yourself. Then you'll be the one at fault.

There will always be gender conflict, but the sheer amount of hatred between the sexes at this point is reaching levels of absurdity. Many young men don't want to get married because should the marriage fail, they're the ones being punished by the legal system. I'm of the opinion that most people actually do want a spouse whether or not they'll actually admit it and this has led to both genders being embittered.

Men feel like they can't trust women and that marriage is excessively risky. Due to having a sex drive they still sleep around and enter into relationships with no desire to commit.
Women are angry that a sizable portion of men consider their new found sexual freedom to be nothing more than whoring it up and proceed to complain about being unable to find a "nice guy" or at least one that is willing to commit to something more than a fling. Due to the fact people are typically myopic and love to generalize (look at what I'm doing right now) both genders have proceeded to generalize their opposites instead of treating everyone on a case to case basis.

We've successfully managed to feth everything the hell up. Damn, writing this out has once again made me glad I am single and I don't have a voracious sexual appetite that would get me into trouble. It's just not worth it anymore. Not with all this hatred. I wonder how many others feel like me and have just given up on it.

Your talking about a veeeeerrrryyyy small portion of the population there though. Most people are happily carrying on as they always have done, getting married, sometimes screwing it up, and most divorces are amicable, and most have little to share out. You only hear about the small number of bitter ones.

Misandrism 101.

 dogma wrote:

 Ahtman wrote:

Good lord, and you taught undergrads!

The only thing that comes close is the girl that spent an entire semester trying to defend her proposal for a global minimum wage. I wish I still had copies of her papers, they were comedy gold.

In fairness a global minimum wage would definitely be a good idea, a good thing, and is technically achievable, but.....

However a global gynocracy that castrates most men, places the remainder into special camps and selectively aborts future generations of males so women can run the planet is not really similar at all.
Cosmic joke or not this sort of gak should not be laughed at but taken with the same serious condemnation as holocaust denial. What she proposes is essentially a male holocaust and feminists have yet to tell her to shut up, or call her comments offensive. This woman deserves serious sanction, not from any danger of her policies catching on, but because she is indistinguishable from any other hate agenda extremist and might be unstable enough to try to rectify the 'problem' one male at a time. Sure she has free speech rights, but she should be monitored, and ordered to visit a psychiatrist for a safety assessment.

This needs to be posted it seems

As fro females are more peaceful, its total BS.

Those nations with serving front line female soldiers often regretted the decision as they became uncontrollable fast. Israel experienced this problem.

The same is true with terrorist cells. There is a saying in counter-terrorist circles and is true internationally: 'Shoot the women first'. An armed woman is far more likely to commit an atrocity than a male, they are rarer but that is only due to recruitment profiling and societal norms. Female conscription can work, and women in general can be turned into soldiers or terrorists en masse, its just a very bad idea for many reasons. The principle one being that a society can afford to lose males in war and can recover the losses in one generation, but it cant afford a significant drop in the female population of recruitable age, female conscription is a sign of a dying society.

She wants to abort male babies until there's only a small number of men in the world that she'll concentrate together in camps for manual labor and occasional breeding. They then select people for breeding on the basis of measured generic traits. Don't wish to Godwin the thread but the term feminazi has rarely been so apt.

She sounds like a certain overused dictators vision of a daughter.

Talk about a dystopia!

Holocaust references already mentioned Howard, so no fears you didnt Godwin the thread.

Some observations.

1. Anyone notice that we have been given no actual name for this woman.

2. "The Femitheist" has a three year old child. Due to her bat-gak crazy ideology should social services get involved, and what is the gender of the child, I think thats relevant in this case.

3. If it requires a 90% reduction in the male population to achieve "true equality", is "The Femitheist" silently proposing that one man is worth nine women. How is that feminism?
Or is it one man is worth nineteen women, depending on how she is wording the 90% reduction.
Either way that is some inferiority complex leaking out from between the lines, and methinks it explains a lot of the agenda.

4. While normally I avoid judging a woman on her looks while she is trying to make a point because its grossly disrespectful; but I have to go along with Hordini in this case, and say its ok to 'check her out'. Mainly because in this case there is little to nothing to respect, however in having no human respect I wasn't even able to look at her as a sex object; and I even consciously took a second look and tried once I realised this. In a way she has achieved one of the goals of feminism and totally desexualised herself without having to change her appearance, to me at least, and I prefer blondes as a rule.

Here's my bet: someone was crazy enough to stick his stick into lots of crazy, got her pregnant, then realized she was GODDARN CRAZY, dumped her and then she got angry and frustrated and thought of this crazy stuff.

Also the human gender divide of 50:50 has evolved as the optimum between productivity and genetic variation. Harem structures in the wild, such as lion packs controlled by a dominant male, can be counterproductive for the species as a whole due to shortened genetic diversity.

She's probably one of these 'all penetration is rape' feminists as she thinks men should only be there for manual labor and sex when unfortunately requiring fertilisation. People like that can't relate to a loving mutual relationship. That they think every man is a rapist and every relationship is abusive speaks a lot to their state of mind.

 Sigvatr wrote:
Here's my bet: someone was crazy enough to stick his stick into lots of crazy, got her pregnant, then realized she was GODDARN CRAZY, dumped her and then she got angry and frustrated and thought of this crazy stuff.

Quite possibly, on checking the links in the article she started spouting this openly just over two years ago with her International Castration Day rant.
As a (very likely) single mother with a bawling infant keeping her up at all hours, I can see where the root of this frustation stems.

Anyway listen to the wizdom of Frazzie.

 Frazzled wrote:

Seriously as the Immortal Bard once said: "Don't crazy."

1. Anyone notice that we have been given no actual name for this woman.

Or it's just something made up to excite redpillers on reddit.

 Orlanth wrote:

 Sigvatr wrote:
Here's my bet: someone was crazy enough to stick his stick into lots of crazy, got her pregnant, then realized she was GODDARN CRAZY, dumped her and then she got angry and frustrated and thought of this crazy stuff.

Quite possibly, on checking the links in the article she started spouting this openly just over two years ago with her International Castration Day rant.
As a (very likely) single mother with a bawling infant keeping her up at all hours, I can see where the root of this frustation stems.

International

Castration

Day


What the frell is wrong with this woman? This is some seriously messed up gak. I came here to procrastinate when I have an essay due, I think I will just slink off to my essay now.

And maybe never return to the internet again.

 Krellnus wrote:

 Orlanth wrote:

 Sigvatr wrote:
Here's my bet: someone was crazy enough to stick his stick into lots of crazy, got her pregnant, then realized she was GODDARN CRAZY, dumped her and then she got angry and frustrated and thought of this crazy stuff.

Quite possibly, on checking the links in the article she started spouting this openly just over two years ago with her International Castration Day rant.
As a (very likely) single mother with a bawling infant keeping her up at all hours, I can see where the root of this frustation stems.

International

Castration

Day


What the frell is wrong with this woman? This is some seriously messed up gak. I came here to procrastinate when I have an essay due, I think I will just slink off to my essay now.

And maybe never return to the internet again.

You should read the International castration Day proposal, the Femitheist claims to no longer propose this, and favours here new approach in her new proposal called The Ratio.
However it gives some fascinating psychological insights.

first it actually gives the Femitheists actual name, or her first name at least: Kirsty.

Second the castration event is bizzare. On castration day men wait their turn before "The Castrator."

- "The Castrator" is specified as a woman with a knife, not a gelding machine, castrated man or male disciple with a knife but specifically a woman. - This is a 'hands on' job for women and appears to be a Freudian revenge trip sex fantasy.
- Men stand in a circle waiting "the Castrator", thus they witness prior events directly and the processed is ritualised. - Confirming the Freudian sex fantasy.
- Anaesthetic is available afterwards. - Pain is not mentioned or referenced in the proposal consciously, but subliminally this could be a revenge fantasy over childbirth.
- Women are also forced to attend, those who disagree are re-educated forcibly - A concealed hatred at women in stable loving relationships, semi-concious envy?

The Femitheist wrote:Males of all ages will be brought to the public squares of their cities nude, to stand together in a circle, as they await castration by a woman known as "The Castrator", who will be a woman chosen from the public much like a juror.

Girls of all ages will attend, lining the streets to cheer and applaud the males as they join the rest of civilized society.

It will be a free vacation for any working woman. And, young girls will be able to leave school to attend this glorious ceremony.

Kirsty has issues, I really do wonder if she still has custody of her child.

Hello. I would like to publicly identify as an Environmentalist. Now that I have identified that way please take all my following comments in that, and only that context.

I think we need to kill all humans. Humans bad for trees. Kill humans. The killed humans will be used as fertilizer for trees. This is because Trees are good for Trees. The last remaining humans (5% of the population) will be allowed to live out the rest of their natural lives, so that they may make sure that the ground up dead humans are evenly distributed for Treekind. They will be sterilized to ensure there are no more humans. We may find that we need to kill the giraffes too, they eat trees, however more research will be needed. Long live trees!


As I am an Environmentalist my comments are important to focus on generally and particularly when discussing Environmentalism, and Environmentalism should generally framed the context of my comments and those who those who share my views. Trees, long live trees.

 Chongara wrote:
Hello. I would like to publicly identify as an Environmentalist. Now that I have identified that way please take all my following comments in that, and only that context.

I think we need to kill all humans. Humans bad for trees. Kill humans. The killed humans will be used as fertilizer for trees. This is because Trees are good for Trees. The last remaining humans (5% of the population) will be allowed to live out the rest of their natural lives, so that they may make sure that the ground up dead humans are evenly distributed for Treekind. They will be sterilized to ensure there are no more humans. We may find that we need to kill the giraffes too, they eat trees, however more research will be needed. Long live trees!


As I am an Environmentalist my comments are important to focus on generally and particularly when discussing Environmentalism, and Environmentalism should generally framed the context of my comments and those who those who share my views. Trees, long live trees.

I always figured all Environmentalists were nuts, now I know for sure. Thank you for allowing me to come to this realization by speaking for all Environmentalists!


P.S. - If you could post a photo of yourself, this would aid the ability of our fellow Dakkaites to objectify you. Thank you for your understanding.

 Orlanth wrote:

 Krellnus wrote:

 Orlanth wrote:

 Sigvatr wrote:
Here's my bet: someone was crazy enough to stick his stick into lots of crazy, got her pregnant, then realized she was GODDARN CRAZY, dumped her and then she got angry and frustrated and thought of this crazy stuff.

Quite possibly, on checking the links in the article she started spouting this openly just over two years ago with her International Castration Day rant.
As a (very likely) single mother with a bawling infant keeping her up at all hours, I can see where the root of this frustation stems.

International

Castration

Day


What the frell is wrong with this woman? This is some seriously messed up gak. I came here to procrastinate when I have an essay due, I think I will just slink off to my essay now.

And maybe never return to the internet again.

You should read the International castration Day proposal, the Femitheist claims to no longer propose this, and favours here new approach in her new proposal called The Ratio.
However it gives some fascinating psychological insights.

first it actually gives the Femitheists actual name, or her first name at least: Kirsty.

Second the castration event is bizzare. On castration day men wait their turn before "The Castrator."

- "The Castrator" is specified as a woman with a knife, not a gelding machine, castrated man or male disciple with a knife but specifically a woman. - This is a 'hands on' job for women and appears to be a Freudian revenge trip sex fantasy.
- Men stand in a circle waiting "the Castrator", thus they witness prior events directly and the processed is ritualised. - Confirming the Freudian sex fantasy.
- Anaesthetic is available afterwards. - Pain is not mentioned or referenced in the proposal consciously, but subliminally this could be a revenge fantasy over childbirth.
- Women are also forced to attend, those who disagree are re-educated forcibly - A concealed hatred at women in stable loving relationships, semi-concious envy?

The Femitheist wrote:Males of all ages will be brought to the public squares of their cities nude, to stand together in a circle, as they await castration by a woman known as "The Castrator", who will be a woman chosen from the public much like a juror.

Girls of all ages will attend, lining the streets to cheer and applaud the males as they join the rest of civilized society.

It will be a free vacation for any working woman. And, young girls will be able to leave school to attend this glorious ceremony.

Kirsty has issues, I really do wonder if she still has custody of her child.

I'm no psychologist, so the following is based purely off of my observations of my fellow humans only.
This individual, while not necessarily having views that are relatively more or less drastic than some of my own sometimes, seems to have trouble, differentiating a fantasy something which can be healthy if not overly indulged in, with reality which could be rather, dare I say, disasterous to not only herself but others, especially if it is true she has custody of a child (whether on her own, or with a partner).

Hello. I would like to publicly identify as an Administrator. Now that I have identified that way please take all my following comments in that, and only that context.

I think we need to encourage Environmentalist policy to kill all humans, presumably because, as quoted from our manifesto: . "Humans bad for trees. Kill humans. The killed humans will be used as fertilizer for trees. This is because Trees are good for Trees." etc etc

As Administrators we are overseeing the process and are curiously absent, both from the population scheduled for euthanasia and from the 5% of remaining sterilised humans that are an unfortunate necessity for the transition through the depopulation process; though we don't promise not to hurry along the process once we have direct supremacy and excess industries beyond our immediate personal needs are scaled down. For once the last of the suckers, I mean Environmentalists, are dead we Administrators will own and rule the world, not that we don't do so already, its just that we don't like to share.
In order to give our policy wider credibility the giraffes will also have to go, sorry giraffes.

I am an Administrator and this is my message; and oh, I almost forgot, "long live trees!"

The person who was interviewed for this is quite possibly the most successful troll in recent Dakka history.

I feel sorry for her kid if she actually has one.

if male...his mother despises him.
If female...she'll be raised to despise 50% of the human race.

 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
I feel sorry for her kid if she actually has one.

if male...his mother despises him.
If female...she'll be raised to despise 50% of the human race.

Someone should get her real name and inform child care :/