Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Wonder why he scored so low??! Must've been a crazy killer DE list...

 Blackmoor wrote:
Ben got a higher paint score than Goatboy. Ha!

Yeah, they screwed the paint score up. I am always supposed to be 1 point higher than Thomas!

You mean 2 - cuz i was missing a display board and lost a point... Booyaa!!!

 GoatboyBBMA wrote:
You mean 2 - cuz i was missing a display board and lost a point... Booyaa!!!

Cheater!

 Cortez667 wrote:
It seems wrong to me that someone with such low Sportsmanship should be able to place.

Until you look at the railhead rumble sports rubric and realize the player probably scored 'expected tournament list and player' (eg 6 points a game) for all their games.

In otherwords they weren't bad sports at all, people just didn't think the games were anything special either. It happens because beyond cheating the rest of the ways people rate sports and fav opponent are subjective and really depend on who you play rather than you being an evil bad sport.

Very true, but come on. He's the lowest out of all the attendees. That indicates to me that something was up with how he played.

Always a good thing to speculate.

Not speculation when there's numbers involved.

 Cortez667 wrote:
Very true, but come on. He's the lowest out of all the attendees. That indicates to me that something was up with how he played.

The players who scored the most battle points (over 100) had the lowest sports scores.

Typical.

Can anyone who attended the event explain the "High BP, low Sportsmanship" evidenced by the results?
What's that all about?

I ask because this is an event that some friends and I would like to attend in the future and it seems kind of weird to see these stats.

 House Griffith wrote:
Can anyone who attended the event explain the "High BP, low Sportsmanship" evidenced by the results?
What's that all about?

I ask because this is an event that some friends and I would like to attend in the future and it seems kind of weird to see these stats.

Being graceful while beating someone to a pulp is an important life skill to master.

PanzerLeader wrote:

 House Griffith wrote:
Can anyone who attended the event explain the "High BP, low Sportsmanship" evidenced by the results?
What's that all about?

I ask because this is an event that some friends and I would like to attend in the future and it seems kind of weird to see these stats.

Being graceful while beating someone to a pulp is an important life skill to master.

This! My best sport vote went to the one person who beat me. All of my games were great, and I had a ton of fun.

I think Best General got chipmunked once or twice and that is why is score is so low.