Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2014/11/28 08:42:38
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
I'm doing elaborate bases for all my newer miniatures, drilling and pinning them to resin bases (40K), slate, milliput cobblestone (LOTR)...I'm using Army Painter grass tufts, flower tufts, barbed wire...No fething way am I switching base sizes.
This might sense for larger models like Terminators, Centurions, Tyranid Warriors and Obliterators, but not man sized models.
2014/11/28 13:50:50
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Shadow Captain Edithae wrote: I'm doing elaborate bases for all my newer miniatures, drilling and pinning them to resin bases (40K), slate, milliput cobblestone (LOTR)...I'm using Army Painter grass tufts, flower tufts, barbed wire...No fething way am I switching base sizes.
This might sense for larger models like Terminators, Centurions, Tyranid Warriors and Obliterators, but not man sized models.
And that rumor is probably false, so don't worry.
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
2014/11/28 14:58:52
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Kid_Kyoto wrote: If this turns out to be true then I want to be on record predicting GW will soon switch all their games from inches to cubits and sell proprietary cubit rulers and tape measures.
I'm pretty sure measurements in future GW products will be in "grims".
Oh come on, "Skulls" surely?!
With blast markers now measured in "Skulls Squared"
Zed wrote: *All statements reflect my opinion at this moment. if some sort of pretty new model gets released (or if I change my mind at random) I reserve the right to jump on any bandwagon at will.
2014/11/28 15:18:01
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Hehehe... this thread is funny and painful all in one!
1) If it is a groundless rumor it certainly makes you think for a minute and feel that flash of anger as you think back on all your models.
2) If it is true, rage-quit may not quite happen but a pointed ignoring them may be the result (GW, you sorry you do not hold tournaments to enforce this now??).
3) Some crazy people may stoically start swapping bases, looking at it as an opportunity to touch-up their models and make them better.
4) The horde army people will look at GW with a crazed look in their eye and say "too bloody bad" and none of us will comment if we know what is good for us.
So yeah, no freak-out or drama really in the cards I figure.
A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
Napoleon Bonaparte
2014/11/28 15:23:36
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Eilif wrote: Perhaps I missed it, but are folks forgetting the long-held and not-likely-to-change GW rule that you can use whatever base the model was sold with.
I have my doubts about the rumor, but even if it happens, there's no re-basing that will be necessary unless someone wants to.
ya, i see old termies on lil bases all the time
2014/11/28 21:37:34
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Since when has the standard not been bases it came with or current base size? Closest of an issue I've seen is square base demons and baby termies on 25mm. People seem to be making an issue of nothing.
2014/11/28 21:48:38
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Oh... delicious. So very delicious- More room for scenic basing for all the future Tacticals I guess.
"Fear is freedom! Subjugation is liberation! Contradiction is truth! These are the truths of this world! Surrender to these truths, you pigs in human clothing!" - Satsuki Kiryuin, Kill la Kill
2014/11/28 22:26:30
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
So, it seems all marines are represented by the 32mm bases (with terminators on the 40mm obviously). It doesn't appear that the genestealers are so is this going to be something like a marine-specific change to create more contract between them and punier humans?
I think a number of designers have gone on record saying that the current marines are true scale. I just wish their descriptions in the fluff and models were at least consistent!
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/11/28 22:31:59
2014/11/28 22:37:11
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
That picture reminds me of just how much I hate the greco-bowl-cut hairdo they chose for the Blood Angel helmet-less miniatures.
If Marines alone are getting new bases and being scaled up a bit, that's not a bad thing as far as game continuity is concerned. Old timers figures will feel a bit puny, but that's kind of always been the case. It would be fitting for marines to finally be bigger than the average Guardsman.
I think a number of designers have gone on record saying that the current marines are true scale. I just wish their descriptions in the fluff and models were at least consistent!
Do you mean the upcoming marines or the current line? Because either the Marines are true scale or the Imperial Guard are true scale. When you figure in power armor and such they're the same size so both can't be true.
This is of course setting asside the fact that GW hasn't made an imperial miniature with "True Scale" proportions (true height maybe, but not true-scale) in a couple of decades now.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/11/28 22:42:12
I meant the current line of Space Marines. I know it doesn't make sense, and you're right that IG end up being the same height (though I keep hearing when Marines aren't in a "crapping" position they are a bit taller)... I think it just comes down to the fact that the regular humans GW produces are grossly out of scale- FW does a much better job. I suppose the switch to 32mm bases specifically for just Marines would help drive home the "superhuman" concept a bit more.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/11/28 22:43:48
2014/11/28 22:47:32
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
If this is true and its compulsory for play I think that will be it for me and 40k, I dont really feel like changing my orks or tyranids from one base to another, granted I could start a new army.
If it's not compulsory there is no fething way that I'll be changing anything.
On another not those Blood Angels there do seem thinner and taller, but I doubt they would true scale it.
Morat Noob
New Sylvans eventually
10k+
30k
Snowy bases for the snow god!!
2014/11/28 22:57:10
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Accolade wrote: I meant the current line of Space Marines. I know it doesn't make sense, and you're right that IG end up being the same height (though I keep hearing when Marines aren't in a "crapping" position they are a bit taller)... I think it just comes down to the fact that the regular humans GW produces are grossly out of scale- FW does a much better job. I suppose the switch to 32mm bases specifically for just Marines would help drive home the "superhuman" concept a bit more.
I see.
The GW line about the crapping position is just something they say to distract from the fact that back in '99 or so they made their Plastic Catachans too tall and almost every IG release since then has been of a similar height to the Catachans. Having the marines straighten up might add a smidge to their height, but not much and certainly not enough to put them in proper proportion to IG figures. Most IG are in leaning positions too.
I'll be the first to kick GW around for the inevitable price raise that will accompany true-height marines, but I have to admit that it would be an appropriate resize.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/11/28 22:57:47
Accolade wrote: I meant the current line of Space Marines. I know it doesn't make sense, and you're right that IG end up being the same height (though I keep hearing when Marines aren't in a "crapping" position they are a bit taller)... I think it just comes down to the fact that the regular humans GW produces are grossly out of scale- FW does a much better job. I suppose the switch to 32mm bases specifically for just Marines would help drive home the "superhuman" concept a bit more.
I see.
The GW line about the crapping position is just something they say to distract from the fact that back in '99 or so they made their Plastic Catachans too tall and almost every IG release since then has been of a similar height to the Catachans. Having the marines straighten up might add a smidge to their height, but not much and certainly not enough to put them in proper proportion to IG figures. Most IG are in leaning positions too.
I'll be the first to kick GW around for the inevitable price raise that will accompany true-height marines, but I have to admit that it would be an appropriate resize.
You're right about the re-positioning of the legs, it doesn't do a whole ton. The "good news" for GW is most of their IG troop line is pretty bad and out-of-date, so they have the opportunity to shrink down any new IG troop kits if they're working on a re-sizing of of the game (via 32mm bases), and at least they would be consistent with Forgeworld.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/11/28 23:07:15
2014/11/28 23:12:42
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
So, it seems all marines are represented by the 32mm bases (with terminators on the 40mm obviously). It doesn't appear that the genestealers are so is this going to be something like a marine-specific change to create more contract between them and punier humans?
I think a number of designers have gone on record saying that the current marines are true scale. I just wish their descriptions in the fluff and models were at least consistent!
Then the Imperial Guard range is oversized.
2014/11/28 23:14:04
Subject: Re:25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
So I guess combining the new tax squad preview with Deathstorm we know that marines are moving to 32mm.
Gene stealers still being on 25mm suggests it's not a new normal base size for most infantry.
2014/11/29 00:16:56
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
Hmm...40 conscripts, 60 guardsmen, 40 veteran guardsmen, several command/platoon squads and psykers/priests/commissars... Yeah... No.. I'll stick to the 25mm bases.
2014/11/29 00:18:12
Subject: 25mm bases being replaced by 32mm bases in 40K?
That would have the interesting result that GW is still making 25mm scale models! With a 7 foot marine being 28-29mm to-the-eye, a human would be around 25mm to the eye. And since millimeter scales are based on the height to the eye of an average sized man….