Switch Theme:

Competitive Poll: Are Space Wolves competitive?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Are space wolves competitive?
yes they are. 62% [ 50 ]
overpriced and underperforming. 6% [ 5 ]
hell no. 2% [ 2 ]
They are like Fenrir, they'll eat odin and anything smaller. 12% [ 10 ]
depends on you moron. 17% [ 14 ]
Total Votes : 81
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Grovelin' Grot




United States

Just a quick poll. need repsonses. thinking about buying. thanks.

 
   
Made in ca
Sneaky Lictor



oromocto

They definitly are with great options both as droppod first strike and Thunder Wolf Cav, good new flyers and evin some cool bike tricks.
   
Made in no
Dakka Veteran




One of the largest (if not the largest) tournaments in Norway was won by SW/SM a little while back, with a drop pod list.
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

The last poll option appears to be missing a comma.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

Depends on you, moron.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in gb
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin






TWC are borderline broken when equipped properly. Really hard for my Crons to deal with!
   
Made in hr
Screaming Shining Spear






What do you consider "properly equipped" ? There are a couple schools of thought here. Deathstar TWC boosted by bike RP and Iron Priests on Thunderwolves is just one of them, for example.

I myself go "cheap" with them. Add a Wolf Lord with RA for 2+ tanking, add an Iron Priest with 4 Cyberwolves and 5-6 TWC with just 2-3 SS and a PF.

There are others. But it's always useful to hear from the mouth of an opponent, what his view on their performance based on their equipment.
   
Made in us
Grovelin' Grot




United States

 wuestenfux wrote:
Depends on you, moron.


Danke schon meine freund.

 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




 wuestenfux wrote:
Depends on you, moron.


Was that necessary?
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Big Borg wrote:
Was that necessary?


The statement or the comma?

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in gb
Shas'ui with Bonding Knife




Space Wolves are clearly competitive; they're one of the best armies in the game!
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: