Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The relic entry if you wouldn't mind, not that it makes to much of a difference getting me book tommorow.

Eh... the list has already been passed around and I'm pretty sure that while you can post unit costs, upgrade points is a bit of a no-no. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

No I meant the rule before it, not hte relics I know what the relics are.

What I posted on last page: "A model may take one of the following". In the Artefacts of the Aeons section, it says "Only one can be taken per army".

I like the replacement of illustrations and not just pics of painted models. Nice looking Dex and lay out.

Requizen wrote:
What I posted on last page: "A model may take one of the following". In the Artefacts of the Aeons section, it says "Only one can be taken per army".

Ahh, okay. I've ordered the iPad version, so it'll be interesting to see what's been programmed into the force requisition thing - it's usually pretty good for settling artefact and formation stuff.

Chad Warden wrote:

Kangodo wrote:
The argument is that a Spyder can add up to 2 other Spyders.
'Canoptek Spyder' does not exist, we have no points for that.
The only legal entry is a 'unit of Canoptek Spyders'

Then I guess RAW you can have no Spyders since it specifies "Canoptek Spyder" and said unit does not exist.

Exalted.

Stunning what people can attempt to rationalize.

Just catching up on this thread so sorry about a bit of subject necromancy...

Talking

On Kickstarter there were two custom dice campaigns in 2014. I backed one in November and they are making mine for a copyrighted game I own that is awesome in all ways except to keep the cost down they used sticker dice. I look forward to receiving the upgrade!

You can go to Kickstarter and type in custom dice. You will find the last two project creators and you can ask them if they plan another KS or if they regularly make custom dice outside the campaigns. Or just lurk for the next one...

Just ran some mathhammer. Assuming that they still have their shield, It would take an expected 2 units of 7 cover-ignoring, gauss tombblades shooting at rapid fire range to take down a wave serpent a turn.
They are still super durable, but I expect them to need to take the going to keep their shields at home rather than risk shooting them off.

Requizen wrote:
What I posted on last page: "A model may take one of the following". In the Artefacts of the Aeons section, it says "Only one can be taken per army".

One of EACH, not one total.

Big distinction that, as the way you just wrote it makes it sound as though you can only take a single artifact for your entire army...

davethepak wrote:

Chad Warden wrote:

Kangodo wrote:
The argument is that a Spyder can add up to 2 other Spyders.
'Canoptek Spyder' does not exist, we have no points for that.
The only legal entry is a 'unit of Canoptek Spyders'

Then I guess RAW you can have no Spyders since it specifies "Canoptek Spyder" and said unit does not exist.

Exalted.

Stunning what people can attempt to rationalize.

BRAVO!

Without wanting to get too far into the rules debate here, I'm not seeing what's so "rationalization"-ey about reading the english conjugation of a singular noun to mean, well, singular.

The book is out now - time to celebrate!

And time, sadly, to close up shop here!