Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 11:52:26
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Enginseer with a Wrench
|
Yodhrin wrote: Nonsense. You contradict your own point right there in the second sentence; they are religiously obsessed with preserving technology, its discovery and continued existence is their primary goal, and while they would doubtless have great respect for what they interpret the intended purpose of a machine spirit to be, it runs completely contrary to their core aims to use a piece of technology in a situation which would inevitably lead to it being lost forever. Perpetually marching these things around outside a forge as a showy piece of ceremony isn't using them to their full potential, but it does ensure they will continue to exist, it isn't "discarding" them; taking them into war continually when they can't be repaired or even switched on again if they trip over a sodding rock is mad - not from our perspective, but from theirs. Every bit of fiction I can recall about these kinds of irreplaceable technologies in 40K points to them only ever being used in the most dire of circumstances when literally every other option had been exhausted and the alternative was total defeat - deploying them as a frontline combat unit in the Mechanicus' army, in a role that requires them to run right up to the enemy and bash them over the noggin, is moronic. If they were merely rare or difficult to build/fix, fine, sure, the Imperium does that all the time with Terminator suits etc, but the fact they're impossible to fix and can't even be restarted if they stall out or fall over, that might just be the silliest bit of fluff GW have written in recent years, and that is a high bar to clear. Well, considering these things are presumably built using an ancient STC, as all Dark Age Imperial technology is, they shouldn't be too irreplaceable. I just presume that, desite deing able to produce them, the knowledge of how to properly operate and maintain the machines has been lost to history.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/27 12:06:06
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 11:54:50
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
GW just can't help themselves - they're like 'Rimmer' from Red Dwarf; anytime things are going well, they just can't deal with sucess and deliberately mess up to get back in their comfort zone.
|
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle.. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 12:57:23
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:drbored wrote:Skitarii book is on a par with the militarum tempestus book
I've been told it isn't.
Can't say any more than that though...
I hope you're right. I want to see a codex with a ton of options.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 13:00:17
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Stoic Grail Knight
|
JohnnyHell wrote:Let's accept that an undead psychic super-skeleton rules the universe via legions of genetically manipulated, surgically-altered walking tank people with a Greco-Roman fashion fixation, but let's hotly debate whether unguents and oils are a suitable eyelid replacement.
GO TEAM!
Hey now, I just said it was a silly concept and then people started trying to rationalize GW's thought process. I had to try to clear that up!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 13:42:24
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Hauptmann
Hogtown
|
Accolade wrote: JohnnyHell wrote:Let's accept that an undead psychic super-skeleton rules the universe via legions of genetically manipulated, surgically-altered walking tank people with a Greco-Roman fashion fixation, but let's hotly debate whether unguents and oils are a suitable eyelid replacement.
GO TEAM!
Hey now, I just said it was a silly concept and then people started trying to rationalize GW's thought process. I had to try to clear that up!
You're giving the mechanicus too much credit and sort of missing one of the overarching themes of 40k here.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/27 13:42:46
Thought for the day |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 13:55:38
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
kronk wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:drbored wrote:Skitarii book is on a par with the militarum tempestus book
I've been told it isn't.
Can't say any more than that though...
I hope you're right. I want to see a codex with a ton of options.
He didn't say that because it wasn't on par that it meant that it was better....
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:00:47
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Yodhrin wrote: ClockworkZion wrote:Deadawake1347 wrote:Not to try and sound over dramatic, but it's not "just a game." I'm not sure you could say 40K has ever been "just a game", which is something I would attribute more to something like checkers.
The whole point of the fluff is to make it more than just a game, it's a constructed universe housing the collective works of thousands of people. Every piece of fluff adds to that, either positively or negatively. In this case, negatively, as it makes no sense whatsoever for this to be a weapon of war if it's so incredibly unstable that having it stand still for a few seconds will result in it never moving again.
Edit: Now I'm just imagining it running in place if it needs to stand still for transport or to take cover, like a little kid doing the "I need to go potty" dance.
At the end of the day it is just a game though. As much as I like the fluff I recognize it being like cartoons from the 80s: it exists to sell toys. Besides, the point is that it's all fiction and nerd raging about fiction is something I that basically just waste my time. I'd rather accept it being a thing and move on and focus on the things I like instead. It's a lot less frustrating to me.
It's just a game to you. If that's all you get out of it, and all you want to get out of it, knock yourself out. For some of us, the only reason we give even the slightest gak about the game is the fiction, so seeing the fiction diminished also diminishes our enjoyment, and we're perfectly entitled to take that view and express it. If reading our "nerd raging" frustrates you, perhaps you can muster up some of that Zen attitude and leave folk to make their comments without trying to imply their view is invalid or petty.
If you're going to get overly emotionally invested in what is basically a tool for selling models, you're going to have a bad time.
I'm not saying not to enjoy the fiction, or that nothing is worth enjoying, I'm saying to not take it so damn seriously when it does something you don't like. You'll live longer if you're not in a constant state of agitation over it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:01:36
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
RedFox wrote: unmercifulconker wrote:I love the ranger with the long LONG ass rifle. The leadbelcher spray will be most welcome indeed.
I might have to get some just to paint but then again I said that about the Harlequins and now I own a Dark Eldar and Eldar army.
Id love to mix them up with my Templars for an Armageddon force. Even though Templars dislike them, I dont suppose they like anyone who doesnt serve the Emperor first.
Next I need some Steel Legion models.
is there anyone that the black templars doesn't dislike ? 
I dont think there is, I mean they honour those who fight like them and highly respect them, but actually 'like' someone, I dont think Templars have that emotion.
I love looking at those rangers, pretty plastic, wonder what's coming next.
Is it time to make Speed 3: Adeptus Mechanicus?
|
Fury from faith
Faith in fury
Numquam solus ambulabis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:15:44
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Hey guys, I just removed my eyelids and tried oiling them witha bit of WD40 and now I'm in quite a lot of pain and the hospital refuses to intone The Litany Of Pain or the Prayer Of Unblinking Sight. What should I do? Anyone got the number of a good Techpriest? Sorry for ay typos, there really is quite a lot of blood and I'm pretty much touh-typing here...
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:16:19
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
unmercifulconker wrote: RedFox wrote: unmercifulconker wrote:I love the ranger with the long LONG ass rifle. The leadbelcher spray will be most welcome indeed.
I might have to get some just to paint but then again I said that about the Harlequins and now I own a Dark Eldar and Eldar army.
Id love to mix them up with my Templars for an Armageddon force. Even though Templars dislike them, I dont suppose they like anyone who doesnt serve the Emperor first.
Next I need some Steel Legion models.
is there anyone that the black templars doesn't dislike ? 
I dont think there is, I mean they honour those who fight like them and highly respect them, but actually 'like' someone, I dont think Templars have that emotion.
I love looking at those rangers, pretty plastic, wonder what's coming next.
Is it time to make Speed 3: Adeptus Mechanicus?
They get along with the Sisters of Battle just fine. Everyone else can feth off.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:28:10
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
The Forgeworld thing we knew was coming for a while.
Plastic HH... look, I dunno why people keep talking about it. It's been refuted by lots of reputable groups (like Lords of Wargaming) and if it is coming, it won't be for a long time.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 14:41:49
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Warhams-77 wrote:
We had heard from shops for a long time (since 2011 or even 2009 ( SH 3rd Ed)) Games Workhop doesn't inform anyone including their own shops about future products except when product can already be ordered. So that has changed recently?
Some of the GW employees are better informed than others, and some of them are huge fan boys themselves and can't help but gossip about what they have heard, in a completely unofficial, and probably unprofessional, manner. They tell a person, who tells a friend, who posts something online.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:04:21
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I don't know what's funnier, the idea of the admech using a machine that can't stop, or how agitated people are getting over it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:05:02
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Requizen wrote:drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
The Forgeworld thing we knew was coming for a while.
Plastic HH... look, I dunno why people keep talking about it. It's been refuted by lots of reputable groups (like Lords of Wargaming) and if it is coming, it won't be for a long time.
It hasn't been refuted, they just say "not in May". That said, it's supposed to be some kind of stand alone game first before seeing release as plastic kits so it's possible we're going to see the game soon.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:16:39
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
ClockworkZion wrote:Requizen wrote:drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
The Forgeworld thing we knew was coming for a while.
Plastic HH... look, I dunno why people keep talking about it. It's been refuted by lots of reputable groups (like Lords of Wargaming) and if it is coming, it won't be for a long time.
It hasn't been refuted, they just say "not in May". That said, it's supposed to be some kind of stand alone game first before seeing release as plastic kits so it's possible we're going to see the game soon.
Well, their exact words were "gak, you will see a Tau codex before you see plastic Horus Heresy", so meaning "maybe coming out by the end of the year... maybe". Doesn't really sound like "confirmed" to me.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:26:33
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Saying your rumor was "confirmed" is a great way to get traction on an unsubstantiated rumor. The only things in that list I believe is "more paint colors" and "1010 copies of the limited ed mechanicus codex" since that's the kind of cute thing GW like to do.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:28:19
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Stoic Grail Knight
|
Las wrote: Accolade wrote: JohnnyHell wrote:Let's accept that an undead psychic super-skeleton rules the universe via legions of genetically manipulated, surgically-altered walking tank people with a Greco-Roman fashion fixation, but let's hotly debate whether unguents and oils are a suitable eyelid replacement.
GO TEAM!
Hey now, I just said it was a silly concept and then people started trying to rationalize GW's thought process. I had to try to clear that up!
You're giving the mechanicus too much credit and sort of missing one of the overarching themes of 40k here.
I don't think so. There's a difference between not understanding (and then venerating) technology, whilst sill being able to reproduce it without a true understanding its intrinsic qualities, and banging hunks of metal together yelling "Praise the Omnissiah!" to create a clear pictures of how backwards technology is in the 40k universe. There has to be some level of understanding going on, even if it's misunderstood as mystical.
And while the AM might be zealous and backwards in their understanding of technology, they certainly understand basic concepts of economy. It goes back to the walker having to always move- it would make more sense (yet still be backwards in thinking) to have those things running around on Mars showing off the glories of the AM instead of running into a battlefield, where their inability to ever stop would result in them being destroyed post-haste. It's not going to look good for some Magos if he lets all of his chicken walkers get sacrificed in one battle when he could have used Skitarii, or Land Raiders, or something that is at least more reliable rather than his precious relics. It's a separation between faith (in the machines) and preservation of important materials.
I just feel there is a lot of nuance that can be shown in the AM beyond these most recent showcasings in lore, where they seem to be throwing their materials into the meat grinder as fast as possible while shouting venerations to the Machine God. To have them be completely nutters to the point where they are literally psychopaths creates this lack of plausibility that ANY race could be stopped by them, let alone the super-advanced races like the Eldar and Necrons. The Imperium fights a lot of losing battles, but if the people controlling things are just yelling "durrrrr, technology!" then it would just be stories of all of the humans being massacred instantaneously with no ability to fight back, and the human race would have been extinguished. And I realize we're talking about a really crazy fiction universe, but there has to be *some* level of feasibility present.
Obviously there is some level of understanding, we have Space Marines and intergalatic travel and supply chains and government and everything else that goes with a (semi)functioning society. To bring AM to the point of cave-people only knowing how to bow down to a machine is to more indicative of the type of people that currently write 40k fiction and is less to do with the actually functionality of the AM. I think appearances of AM forces in books (i.e. Dark Mechanicus) show that there is something greater than just veneration there, but the tendencies towards conservative thought in technology and a lack of true understanding are what impede the Imperium from showing significant improvement.
Just my thoughts on the topic, take or leave it. I think the eyelid removal thing was more of an excuse to say "this is what grimdark looks like!", lacking any of the sort of subtlety that was (sometimes) present in older fluff. At the end of the day, it's obviously entirely inconsequential, but I think I am perfectly fine in saying that this particular piece of fluff is daft and on par with stuff like Khornate Knights.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:34:37
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Leaping Khawarij
|
JohnnyHell wrote:Hey guys, I just removed my eyelids and tried oiling them witha bit of WD40 and now I'm in quite a lot of pain and the hospital refuses to intone The Litany Of Pain or the Prayer Of Unblinking Sight. What should I do? Anyone got the number of a good Techpriest? Sorry for ay typos, there really is quite a lot of blood and I'm pretty much touh-typing here...
I'm afraid you'll need these replacements. But if you Have Bionic eyes you don't need ears right?, I take ears now, Bionics come in 2 - 6 weeks!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 15:44:01
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Requizen wrote: ClockworkZion wrote:Requizen wrote:drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
The Forgeworld thing we knew was coming for a while.
Plastic HH... look, I dunno why people keep talking about it. It's been refuted by lots of reputable groups (like Lords of Wargaming) and if it is coming, it won't be for a long time.
It hasn't been refuted, they just say "not in May". That said, it's supposed to be some kind of stand alone game first before seeing release as plastic kits so it's possible we're going to see the game soon.
Well, their exact words were "gak, you will see a Tau codex before you see plastic Horus Heresy", so meaning "maybe coming out by the end of the year... maybe". Doesn't really sound like "confirmed" to me.
We'll see, but I don't expect see the HH game being part of the normal release cycle and thus can get away with being early, while the stand-alone model release will be much later.
But that's just my guess.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:16:12
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Mmm. Cool models. I'll definitely be picking up at least one box of infantry to paint up. I'll wait for the book before I expand them further though...
I was just starting to get on top of my painting backlog and then BA and now this happen. Emperor save me if Death Watch or Sisters happen this year.
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:22:49
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
The chicken is slowly growing on me although I would have much prefered a tracked or multi legged walker.
Not digging the troops though, too many cloaks for me.
|
Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be
By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.
"Feelin' goods, good enough". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:32:09
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
So the white "line with tiny boxes" pattern on the cloaks of the Rangers and Vanguard, the typical mechanicus cloak pattern, are those painted on or did they use decals? I've never been able to get straight lines/geometric shapes to be that crisp.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:46:23
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
|
Probably painted. Youd have to have a unique set of decals for each set of legs, probably not worth it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:51:33
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
BrianDavion wrote:drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
I'd take that a lot more seriously if he wasn't peddling the Horus heresy plastics stuff
I would take that a lot more seriously if it was only the paint “rumor”  .
And then again, “ GW will release new plastic kits for 40k before the year is over” is a rumor too. Can you track me on it, Pretre?
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 17:52:59
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:BrianDavion wrote:drbored wrote:To add more wood to the fire:
via an anonymous source on Faeit 212
+Forgeworld on main site confirmed
+ Plastic HH confirmed
+All resin kits are to be getting a plastic upgrade before 2017
+This is one of the "Red weeks"
+More paint colors to come before the year is over
+the limited edition of the mechanicum codex will be limited only to 1010
I'd take that a lot more seriously if he wasn't peddling the Horus heresy plastics stuff
I would take that a lot more seriously if it was only the paint “rumor”  .
And then again, “ GW will release new plastic kits for 40k before the year is over” is a rumor too. Can you track me on it, Pretre?
Yep, but that'd put you at 0/0/1 immediately.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 18:44:42
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
New York, USA
|
Tyr13 wrote:Probably painted. Youd have to have a unique set of decals for each set of legs, probably not worth it.
Not necessarily, I think the decals come in strips that you can cut down to size for each torso.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 19:11:27
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
scuzz_bucket wrote:I don't know what's funnier, the idea of the admech using a machine that can't stop, or how agitated people are getting over it.
Definitely the latter.
If they had female space marines, people would be burning books as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 19:12:26
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
New York, USA
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 19:13:22
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/27 19:14:20
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k
|
 |
Sagitarius with a Big F'in Gun
tornado alley, United States
|
Paradigm wrote:Rules for this unit type, the first Vehicle for Vehicles in Warhammer 40,000, can be found overleaf, and thanks to our rigourous consideration over lunch as to how they function, are certain to cause absolutely no confusion whatsoever.
I halfway skimmed the first part of that as I was looking away and somehow I got
"Runes for the rune priest" Wait, what? Who are we talking about, whut?
|
~6000 ~4000 ~1000
Imperial Knights: & Admech:
My finance plays
DR:70+S+G+M++B+I+Pw40k14++D+A++/sWD409R+++T(M)DM+
I do not work for GW in any fashion. When I edit my post, either I've misspelled something, punctuation, or I'm fixing swearing. Oops. |
|
 |
 |
|