| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 03:46:12
Subject: Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It's been a fairly common release pattern from FW - to release an alternate version of a new GW release. Do you think the Skitarii will get the FW treatment? Will they look dramatically better/different? What would you change with the skitarii?
Some side thoughts I've had about the Admech:
I really like the current admech GW look (FREAKIN SPACE SALLET HELMETS - YES!).
If I were going to be a bit picky about the skitarii models though, it would be that the coats are bit too straight - lacking that natural flowing robe look to them. It's probably just the nature of GW plastics. No biggie, and something I can easily bend, twist, paint lighting.
Also, for whatever reason, since reading Titanicus, the mental image I had of Skitarii were more of a beastly mechanical look, with bizarre tribal ornamentation. Think the creature suit from 'The Village' but with mechadendrites and steampunk'ized. It's probably just a world specific thing though. Or, maybe I just misinterpreted something out of the novel? Anyone else thought this?
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/03/26 03:56:42
Age of Sigmar - It's sorta like a clogged toilet, where the muck crests over the rim and onto the floor. Somehow 'ground marines' were created from this...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 04:07:08
Subject: Re:Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
nope. I sincerly doubt it; rather forge world'll likely if anything add onto the admech codex with a varity of new options. much like Imperial Knights
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 04:12:24
Subject: Re:Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
BrianDavion wrote:nope. I sincerly doubt it; rather forge world'll likely if anything add onto the admech codex with a varity of new options. much like Imperial Knights
Forgeworld added new knight variants. I don't think that comparison works exactly. Granted they are a different listing/ different codex. I'm just talking about the model type variation more so, and not the literal rules so much.
|
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2015/03/26 04:18:23
Age of Sigmar - It's sorta like a clogged toilet, where the muck crests over the rim and onto the floor. Somehow 'ground marines' were created from this...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 07:25:30
Subject: Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
So it wasn't just me then. I think they would've been better of without the coats, can't call them robes.
I pictured them a bit more tribal myself, maybe it's just the one's that fight at the feet of their god's though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 11:48:54
Subject: Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
They already have, they're called the adeptus mechanicus...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/26 12:51:04
Subject: Will FW come out with a version of Skitarii?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think FW will stick to the 40k taghmata tbh.
I mean it would be very easy for them to permit crossover between taghmata and skitarii.. but they probably won't.
|
DFTT |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|