Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Re-read DLS rules and...must say that i've found an interesting thing.

All models in the bearer's unit add +X to WS...In addition, the bearer can choose to re-roll any failed to-hits, to-wounds or saving throws that they make. However, should three or more of the reroll generate failed results in the same turn, the model is immediately removed as casualty.

RAW it might mean that any model in the unit can use DLS rerolls! So, you can technically get a unit of, say, MANz with rerollable 2+ armor, 5++ (up to 3++), rerollable to-hits, to-wounds.

Not sure about "the model" part - it might as well mean that the model making the save or the bearer of the banner himself.

LOL no

"...In addition, the bearer can choose to re-roll any failed to-hits, to-wounds or saving throws that they make..."

The "they" in the sentence clearly refers back to the subject of that sentence which is the bearer.

The bearer is "he". And there's conveniently "a unit" located in the previous sentence

Why would "they" not refer to the subject in its sentence and refer to the subject of a completely difference sentence instead?

 koooaei wrote:
The bearer is "he". And there's conveniently "a unit" located in the previous sentence

No. The bearer is never referred to as "he" in Da Lucky Stikk's rules. "They" refers to the bearer.

Isn't "bearer" singular?

 koooaei wrote:
Isn't "bearer" singular?

If you're implying that "they" is necessarily plural, you're incorrect in this case.

Look up "singular they".

 koooaei wrote:
Isn't "bearer" singular?

Its a singular they

Oh, seems they is right!