Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Jihadin wrote:
This sort of action is not new in the world. Everyone knows this right? Just seems some of you all sound "shocked"

Well of course.
(images of Jihadin calling in an A-10 on his ex-wife's stuff)
In the words of the immortal bard: FREEEEEEEEEEEM!

 dogma wrote:

 TheDraconicLord wrote:

Out of curiosity, what exactly is misognystic here? Misogyny is the hatred or distrust of women, correct?

Yes, the reflexive support for the guy is where the misogyny comes in.

 TheDraconicLord wrote:

Hell, his solution for his anger isn't even hurting anyone, so kudos for that.

Technically he's hurting himself and former spouse by destroying either their, or her, property.

So...I find it amusing that he took a very literal view on "she gets half of the stuff"...and in Dogma's world, that makes me a mysogonistic, woman hating a-hole. Riiiiiiight...grow up, Dogma. I'd have been amused in the exact same way if gender roles had been reversed and he cheated and she sawed the stuff in half. The bigger question is if your reaction would be different if their roles were reversed. Would you cheer her, after hurling accusations at him in this thread? If so, that makes you a disgusting hypocrite. Or would you be exactly as offended if she sawed the stuff in half. Just make sure your reaction is equally fair to both people.

 timetowaste85 wrote:
The bigger question is if your reaction would be different if their roles were reversed. Would you cheer her, after hurling accusations at him in this thread? If so, that makes you a disgusting hypocrite. Or would you be exactly as offended if she sawed the stuff in half. Just make sure your reaction is equally fair to both people.

I'm not really offended by his actions, I think they were stupid and petty but beyond that I really don't care. What annoys me is all the people who jumped to his defense in large part because he is a man. I would also be annoyed if someone reflexively jumped to woman's defense in a similar situation.

 Bullockist wrote:

What praytell do you call womens' all men are bastards sessions?

Childish misandry.

I don't jump to his defense due to him being a man. I just generally think the entirety of the human race sucks, so when stupid things like this happen, I choose to laugh at it instead of getting butthurt. It's much easier this way.

Wonder if she took half of what was on the mantle

 dogma wrote:

 Bullockist wrote:

What praytell do you call womens' all men are bastards sessions?

Childish misandry.

In that case, I'm perfectly fine with your statement. Equality is a wonderful thing. That said I do hate the mis- words being thrown round like verbal confetti.

Evidently the video is a fake:
http://factually.gizmodo.com/todays-fake-that-guy-who-cut-everything-in-half-for-hi-1713065476

Too funny! Kind of like the ad where the cement truck driver fills the car with cement.