Dman137 wrote:If someone tired to deep strike a land raider against me,
id laugh in there face, not allowe them to and that would be that. You can't deep strike anything if you don't have anyone to play. Plain and simple. And also it's pretty clear that if you don't have the
DS USR then you can't deep strike. Black and white, now for the love of god end this stupid discussion before it turns into the whole skyhammer
IC bullcrap.
Read what you wrote again and then tell me your interpretations of all things
40k are so infallible that it would allow you to behave in such a...friendly...manner. I'm not even sure I'd want to play toy soldiers with such an individual...correct or not.
And if there is precedent for additional lines of thought, as per the Drop Pod Assault, Ghostwalk Mantle or Deep Strike
USR then the discussion will continue. If you are no longer a fan of the discussion, you don't have to partake.
Pain4Pleasure wrote:Agreed. People trying to make the da codex that much better cause they dealt with crap for so long
It's bad form to judge the motivations of others when you have no clue of their true intent. We risk coming across as armchair experts of human emotion.
For my part I am also playing devil's advocate and have no intentions to use a land raider in such a manner. A 250 point AV14 box is better spent on 5 more terminators or Dread/Pods.
IMHO it's cheese. Still, your blanket statement holds little truth to why I'm working to clarify the rules. Further, it doesn't add to the discussion.
Back on topic, Ghostwalk Mantle also has the same wording as DPA, specific wording "enter play using the Deep Strike rules." As long as we are getting rid of non Deep Strike
USR unit abilities that is another example.
With respect to DPA, being "in Reserves" and "enter play using Deep Strike rules" is pretty much the definition of Deep Strike Reseves. I don't see a clearer precedent.
I also find it odd the restrictions call out Dedicated transports. In that force you can only ever take Drop Pods or Land Raiders. Why not just say Drop Pods? Seems too general.
On the
RW side, our group will allow
IC on bike to conference
RW rule. Removing the
DW rule seems interesting and a good tradeoff.