| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/23 23:57:50
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
How viable would it be to have LotD as the main detatchment? They have the potential to be OP as balls, from what I've read, but there could be some glaring weaknesses that I could be missing.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/24 02:51:47
To quote a fictional character... "Let's make this fun!"
Tactical_Spam wrote:There was a story in the SM omnibus where a single kroot killed 2-3 marines then ate their gene seed and became a Kroot-startes.
We must all join the Kroot-startes... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 00:03:16
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
They're one of the best SM options. Melta Ignores Cover will hurt most Skimmers. They can also do minimum Plasma Squads but I like Sternguard for that.
For being the primary force? Their Warlord Traits don't entirely suck, so there's that.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 00:17:19
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Dont they have T1 auto lose issues or did that get fixed?
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 00:45:34
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
I was wondering the same thing, though they had a Rule requiring them to Deep Strike.
|
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 00:48:08
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Only if they updated the mini-dex will they be viable solo. As a detachment? I plan on running them as soon as I paint them lol. They got a huge buff with ignoring cover.
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 19:12:23
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Desubot wrote:Dont they have T1 auto lose issues or did that get fixed?
It's the same complaint with Deathwing: If you're only running ONE unit in the army, it's pretty boring.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 20:02:41
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Desubot wrote:Dont they have T1 auto lose issues or did that get fixed?
It's the same complaint with Deathwing: If you're only running ONE unit in the army, it's pretty boring.
Its not really the same.
You can deploy Death wing landraiders on the table and not auto lose.
Codex:Legion of the Damned all MUST deploy in reserved and has no way of T1 deep striking so at the end of game T1 they auto lose..
At least that was the original complaint. i do not have the digital edition to see if that was fixed.
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 22:10:11
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
Unfortunately, LotD must either take allies or be an ally, do to GW's inability to understand their own rules. Yet, I love my LotD army, and I love having them arrive just in the nick of time to pop me some OP jinkers! So yeah, you have to run them with something else. Mine keep my Knight Titans from getting lonely.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/24 22:48:38
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
Jeffersonian000, That caused me to picture an imperial knight tucked into a giant bed, cuddling one of the damned like a teddy-bear in the crook of one arm.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/24 22:51:08
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/25 00:36:47
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
|
To quote a fictional character... "Let's make this fun!"
Tactical_Spam wrote:There was a story in the SM omnibus where a single kroot killed 2-3 marines then ate their gene seed and became a Kroot-startes.
We must all join the Kroot-startes... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/25 01:51:37
Subject: Viability of the Legion of the Damned
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Desubot wrote: You can deploy Death wing landraiders on the table and not auto lose. I don't think you can. There is nothing in the land raider rule to override the Deathwing (or what ever rule it's called) that they still have to deep strike still. You might have deep striking land raiders though.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/25 01:52:07
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|