Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Mr.Church13 wrote:
Thanks for the kind word.

That is Daniel Bryan.

Did a nice job on painting him, but man do I miss beardless Daniel Bryan.

You know I really enjoy painting these guys. I'm just not looking forward to the more crazy ones. Like Finn Balor here.



Btw here's JOHN CENA!

His hat lies, I can totally see him

And that's not just freehand on the hat. There's actually pretty impressive raised lettering there.

Big Show beats Cena every time.

That cena looks pretty great.

What did this game cost?

$50 even at GenCon.

 cincydooley wrote:
That cena looks pretty great.

What did this game cost?

A very solid 50 dollar purchase. I'm playing it Wednesday with some friends. Gonna teach the game and do a tag team

I didn't pick it up at Gencon(which I regret), but I preordered at $45.

Taught a friend and his brother to play last night. We tried a 3 team, and the game kind of breaks down with more than 2 teams. We sort of rigged it to work though. Basically you could only do your maneuver against someone that you beat, so you couldn't grapple someone that played a maneuver, but a slam could go against any player, and if your card beat 1 player you got "half a win" for purposes of who gets to pin and beating both players gave you a normal winning card, and ties only occurred when all three players tied.

It was okay for what we were trying to do, but the game is definitely designed for 2 teams. Hopefully a third team expansion can be in the works

Yeah I don't think the system works with more than two guys in the ring at the same time. I've heard suggestions and they're all super complex and time consuming break downs of the RPS that simply don't function with some interactions.

Just like RPS itself its best to stick to one on one.

It's fairly simple to do with RPS- keep going until someone wins.

Losers are immediately removed.

That's a really bloated way of doing it. Just have pairs until a win.


Even then in Showdown you gotta compare everyone, settle ties, deal with reversals. Much better to keep it one one one till GF9 can find an actual working system.

My system would have to be a random turn order and you get to declare one opponent to attack on your turn then you and that one guy proceed as normal. Then it's the nex guy and after you all go random turn order again. Keeps things one on one and the random turn order means partners are never garenteed a double team.

Mr.Church13 wrote:
That's a really bloated way of doing it. Just have pairs until a win.


Even then in Showdown you gotta compare everyone, settle ties, deal with reversals. Much better to keep it one one one till GF9 can find an actual working system.

My system would have to be a random turn order and you get to declare one opponent to attack on your turn then you and that one guy proceed as normal. Then it's the nex guy and after you all go random turn order again. Keeps things one on one and the random turn order means partners are never garenteed a double team.

It just means players cycle through their decks faster(making slams come up more often).

Would really suck if you got thrown out of the ring though...

It was bloated sure, but we came up with it in like 5 minutes, and it was because we didn't want to play a four wrestler tag team, just wanted to have a three way match. And 90% of the game worked like the normal game.we.just had a few interactions where people couldn't do their actions because the person they could attack was a few sauares away.

The bloat thing was more for Sin's description of mass RPS.

Your stuff kinda worked, but I think it's best to wait for a designed system because nothing we've workshopped has been successful personally. Even the one on one turn system's got its flaws.

My copy came in the other. After a few more tests it seems the only time I lose is when I play Cena or Tag Team matches.

Weird that.

Anyone havin success with Cena?

 Sinful Hero wrote:
My copy came in the other. After a few more tests it seems the only time I lose is when I play Cena or Tag Team matches.

Weird that.

Anyone havin success with Cena?

Cena won our three way game, and also beat Big Show in a 1v1, so it is possible to win with him. I have yet to win with him, but I like mister Apex Predator Randy Orton.

Yeah, I've win with him too- I was just curious if anyone else thought he was harder to use.

 Sinful Hero wrote:
Yeah, I've win with him too- I was just curious if anyone else thought he was harder to use.

Don't know.

I played a few games yesterday. We did a 2v2 tag team match, Roman Reigns and Randy Orton vs Daniel Bryan and Big Show. The first match worked out like a normal tag team match would expect. The first two fighters weakened each other, tagged out when they could, and then Big Show showed up... I got tagged in against Roman. Roman has a lot of maneuvers and Big Show has a lot of strikes, so I was pretty much winning every card. Hit Roman with a Spear and then a KO Punch, missed the pin. Next round hit him with my other two slams, and another strike. Went for the pin after doing something like 9 damage in a single "card" (yay stun!). Knocked him out.

Idk how good Roman is, but he's been on like a 4 game losing streak, he lost a game Saturday to Randy Orton, Big Show knocked him out yesterday, then Daniel Bryan kept him from tagging out and pinned him, and then in a Rope Break Match, he lost to Big E.

I'm really enjoying this game, can't wait for more wrestlers.