Switch Theme:

Just realised - A dedication apparently doesn't prevent taking a legacy of ruin. That right?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian




"Daemon engines as well as any vehicle with Daemonic possession vehicle upgrade or the Daemonic Resiliance special rule may not take Legacies of Ruin."
It does not mention at any point any vehicle having a dedication to a chaos god. A dedication is not a Daemon engine, daemonic possession or daemonic resiliance. So it leads me to believe a dread with a dedication can take a Legacy. Makes sense?
Reason I'm asking is that a Ferrum dread with Destroyer of cities and dedication of khorne gets an average of 7 st10 I4 armourbane attacks on the charge, av13 front and a flamestorm and heavy flamer. Now this is pretty dang useless on a footslogging dread, but if it takes the maelstrom raiders legacy it gets to outflank and comes in at 205pts. Still pretty expensive for what it does, but at least semi-useful now.

Side note: having a case of de-ja-vu. Have I realised and thought of this before and completely forgotten :-s?

   
Made in gb
Executing Exarch






I see no reason to assume that the list of Daemon-related exclusions includes dedications unless the blurb behind dedications includes some wording like akin to "counts as a Deamon".

The Legacies are FW stuffs, so I can't check those, but are you talking about Marks when you say dedication, or is it a seperate term from a FW book?
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




A dedication does not make something a daemon engine, so seems fine.

Becoming a Daemon of X (like titans do) probably does, although that does require you to make the logical leap that a ;Daemon engine' Is an engine with the Daemon rule.

DFTT 
   
Made in gb
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian




 Quanar wrote:
I see no reason to assume that the list of Daemon-related exclusions includes dedications unless the blurb behind dedications includes some wording like akin to "counts as a Deamon".

The Legacies are FW stuffs, so I can't check those, but are you talking about Marks when you say dedication, or is it a seperate term from a FW book?


Dedication is seperate from a mark.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

So you both think its ok. Spot on! :-D

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/08/28 08:56:55


 
   
Made in gb
Drakhun





Dedication is not a daemon.


Knock yourself out!

DS:90-S+G+++M++B-IPw40k03+D+A++/fWD-R++T(T)DM+
Warmachine MKIII record 39W/0D/6L
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: