| Poll |
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 16:31:38
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
Inside Yvraine
|
'sup, ladies and gents. Now that the 7E DA have been out for awhile, and people have had time to digest the codex and get some games in, I was curious on how Dakka feels about the codex. How strong is the codex, especially in relation to other marine armies? How many competitive builds and units does it have? Are the formations any good? etc
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/09/05 16:37:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 16:43:10
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Okay at best due to the poor writing. Deathwing is better than it was before though, which is good.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 17:46:35
Subject: Re:Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Couple of niggles (no solo-Deathwing, mistake in the Ravenwing detachment HQ's, loss of fun stuff like Sacred Standards, Librarian Conclave DLC), but overall it's on par with the SM codex (which is rare for a DA codex).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 17:47:43
Subject: Re:Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
Meh. Seems like it could hold its own, but the Dark Angels don't appeal to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 17:57:37
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
Aside form some parts that are in desperate need of an FAQ, the Dark Angels codex is at least as good as the Space Marine codex, which is very high praise.
|
~3000 (Fully Painted)
Coming Soon!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 18:10:49
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Ravenwing are as good as the marines, Greenwing got a nice formation, but are still a bit meh, deathwing got shafted, 50pts for a th/ss...
On the whole it was a step up from the previous books, but still missed out on fixing deathwing as a solo force.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 18:31:34
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought
|
Well Ravenwing became a lot of fun thanks to the super jink, we got grav guns, and interromancy is hilarious. I'd say it was an excellent update, even if Deathwing still isn't useful or functional.
Although we STILL haven't gotten a damn generic "build your own chapter master" for people who Don't play the main chapter and don't like to proxy Azrael.
|
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 18:53:08
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
it's got some mistakes like the ravenwing HQ mess up but it's a pretty good codex, deathwing are still mostly a lame duck but that's just terminators
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 00:22:35
Subject: Re:Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I personally love it. It's a huge step up from the 6th ed. codex (of course, where do you go from the bottom but up?  ). Ravenwing got boosted into orbit with their super-jinks and formations (too bad about the HQ issue though  ), and Greenwing are competitive if you run a Lion's Blade, especially against melee-centric armies. Deathwing, while impossible to really use alone, can still be pretty good, although they suffer from the problems that all termies face these days. Perhaps the biggest gripe I have is that Azrael is really not any good anymore. All he needed was AP2 on his weapon and perhaps Eternal Warrior, and he would be spectacular (even if he was a bit more expensive). He may still see use for giving 50-man Guardsman or Conscript blobs 4+ invuln. saves for the lolz, though!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 05:01:48
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
I think it's ok, but saying it's as good as Marines is pushing it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 06:48:22
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Well at least Azrael can choose his Warlord trait, and at the very least he can duel non-Space Marine characters.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 09:17:51
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
Canada
|
dark angels are a prime example of how unbound can be really really broken. against codex chaos space marines even a new book might not be enough to handle them as an unbound force
the hammer of caliban has all kinds of wild applications that will become what i think is the go to answer for dealing with the new IG codex when it drops because it will just crush any tank formations they get under raw weight of firepower. its a hard counter to steelhost as is.
the ravenwing became very strong this edition with virtually no bad ravenwing units except for the nephilim which is still underpreforming but nobody is perfect i suppose.
the deathwing are absolutely silly as an unbound force if your fighting chaos marines a lot. mixed with cypher you can literally just steamroll everyone.
really my biggest issues is that beyond the lions blade nobody will field veterans still despite becoming silly strong if you can get them snowballing out of control via magic and relics, azreal is totally worthless with 0 synergy going on, deathwing struggle to remain relevant still without doing some really weird things to the point where even i am strongly considering ripping out 750pts of models from my biggest list to replace with other things they struggle so hard.
my final issue is that asmodai continues to have a orthless relic the blades of reason need a buff maybe ap3 and grant him +1 base attacks??
|
DA army: 3500pts,
admech army: 600pts
ravenguard: 565 pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 20:04:33
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought
|
I wouldn't say nobody would field Veterans. They could be a useful dakka spam squad with grav guns.
|
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/06 21:17:29
Subject: Dakka's Opinion on Dark Angels (7th Ed)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Wyzilla wrote:I wouldn't say nobody would field Veterans. They could be a useful dakka spam squad with grav guns.
They're a very cheap way to get LOTS of Combi-Weapons in a Drop Pod. So you'd treat them like a suicide Sternguard squad.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|