Next time please add the text for those who cannot follow links through because of work/whatever reason, thanks

(CNN)The news in this year's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report on sexually transmitted diseases is not good.

The number of cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea in the United States increased between 2013 and 2014, after being on the decline for several years. Cases of syphilis, which have been on the rise for the last decade, shot up in 2014.

Chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis are the three most common STDs in the United States that are also notifiable, meaning health departments are required to report new cases to the CDC. (HIV and shigella are also notifiable STDs.)

Chlamydia is the most common and can damage a woman's reproductive system. The report found that in 2014 there were more than 1.4 million cases of chlamydia, or about 456 for every 100,000 people. There are about 350,000 cases (or 111 for every 100,000 people) of gonorrhea, which causes infections. And there are nearly 20,000 cases (six for every 100,000 people) of syphilis, which if left untreated can lead to serious complications, including blindness.

All three are curable with medication and you can decrease your chances of getting them by practicing safe sex. These numbers represent an increase in chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis cases of 2.8%, 5.1% and 15.1%, respectively, between 2013 and 2014.

"This is a bare minimum of the number of infections occurring in the U.S.," said Dr. Gail Bolan, director of CDC's Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention, and lead author of the report, which was released on Tuesday.

There could be many cases that went undiagnosed because the infections did not cause symptoms, which is typical of chlamydia and gonorrhea, and because people did not have access to health care or their providers did not test them, Bolan said.

Chlamydia has been steadily rising since 1994, when it became a notifiable disease. But the numbers had started to wane in 2011, until the new report, which is the first in several years to see a rebound in chlamydia cases.

However, this rebound for chlamydia might not actually be a bad thing. It is probably largely due to the fact that more people are getting tested, both because providers continue to be more aware of testing since the disease became notifiable and because better tests have been developed, Bolan said.

Unlike with chlamydia, the rise in gonorrhea and syphilis cases in 2014 is probably at least partly due to a true increase in the number of infections, which is concerning, especially for men, Bolan said.

Teen sex rate lowest since the 1980s

The rate of gonorrhea has been up and down since 1941, shortly after it became a notifiable disease, but the trajectory has been mostly upward since 2009, including 2014. Most of the rise has been in men. Surveillance data from certain parts of the country suggest that heterosexual men account for about 50% of the increase and men who have sex with men about 25%, Bolan said.

There has also been a return of syphilis since the early 2000s, after it was largely on the decline since 1941. Although the increase over the last 15 years has mostly been driven by men who have sex with men, the new report found that rates had increased among women by 23%, and among heterosexual men by 14%, between 2013 and 2014.

"Syphilis is a continuing trend among men who have sex with men, and it's really a crisis in this group," said Hayley Mark, associate professor of community-public health at Johns Hopkins School of Nursing. "One thing that is very new in this report is the increase in syphilis among women," she added. Women who are pregnant can pass syphilis onto their babies. It is known as congenital syphilis, which can be deadly if not treated.

What is safe sex for someone with HIV?

Part of the reason for the increase in gonorrhea and syphilis could be that men have condom burnout, or are less likely to wear condoms because infections such as HIV are more treatable and do not seem as scary, Mark said.

"There is no clear single answer" to explain the rise in gonorrhea and syphilis, particularly among men, Bolan said.

Clinics that provided STD testing and treatment across the United States have had to close or shorten their hours, Bolan said. Although it is unclear the full extent of these closures. The CDC does not track access to health care services the same way it tracks diseases; reports suggest many states have cut funding for STD programs, at least since the 2008 recession.

These cutbacks could affect those with poor access to health care, and particularly men who have sex with men. "We know there is still a lot of homophobia and stigma toward our gay communities in the U.S., and a lot of people may prefer to see a provider ... that provides culturally sensitive services."

The increases in chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis detailed in the CDC report are "a bit frustrating as a provider," said Dr. Laura Elizabeth Riley, director of obstetrics and gynecology infectious disease at Massachusetts General Hospital. "These are things that are treatable but also avoidable," she said.

Detecting STIs: Teens believe a color-changing condom is the answer

Patients might not be concerned enough about these diseases, Riley said. "I think the ramifications of having these diseases is wider ranging than people really appreciate," she said.

Chlamydia can be especially devastating for young people, because it could lead to scarring in their reproductive tissue that eventually makes them infertile, Riley said.

The report found that the highest proportion of chlamydia and gonorrhea cases were in people between 15 and 29 years of age. Most syphilis cases were in people 20 to 29 years old.

The finding that rates of these STDs were increasing among men in particular should remind women to do everything they can to protect themselves and use a condom. "And even if you do that, there are still a million reasons why you should be screened. It's not expensive and it could save you as a woman all the heartache associated with downstream effects, such as infertility and poor pregnancy outcomes," Riley said.

The CDC report made several recommendations, including for women younger than 25 who are sexually active, and women of all ages who have new or multiple sex partners, to get screened annually for chlamydia and gonorrhea. Men who have sex with men should ask their doctor for chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis and HIV tests at least once a year.

Relapse wrote:
Be careful out there, folks:


http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/19/health/std-rates-rise-dramatically/index.html

 Sigvatr wrote:
What a surprise, in an age where casual sex is regular sex, STDs are on the rise.

 Torga_DW wrote:

Relapse wrote:
Be careful out there, folks:


http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/19/health/std-rates-rise-dramatically/index.html

Was that published before or after charlie sheen admitted he's hiv positive? Cause, you know, might have affected the results a bit is all i'm saying.

 hotsauceman1 wrote:
If pregnancy is considered a disease, Kronk might have skewed the results.

But no, this is why RAs hand out free condoms. In my opinion, high schools should start doing that.

 Peregrine wrote:

 Sigvatr wrote:
What a surprise, in an age where casual sex is regular sex, STDs are on the rise.

What a surprise, in an age where religious abstinence-only dishonesty is considered "education", STDs are on the rise.

 djones520 wrote:

Not sure what your point is. Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

It's almost like you're just trying to tie this in with a school of thought that you don't like.

 djones520 wrote:
Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

 Peregrine wrote:

 djones520 wrote:
Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Casual sex alone isn't that dangerous, if you make use of the available options for reducing the risk. The real danger is when people are having casual sex without using those options, and abstinence-only "education" is a huge part of that. So if you want to keep STD rates down the place you need to be focusing is teaching people to have sex as safely as possible.

LethalShade wrote:
Well... Isn't it common sense ?

djones520 wrote:Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

 LethalShade wrote:
Was just saying that seeking to have protected casual sex instead of going stupid without even a condom sounds like common sense to me.

 LethalShade wrote:
And yet France is known for its absolute, complete and utter lack of meaningful sexual education in middle and high school.

Relapse wrote:

 LethalShade wrote:
And yet France is known for its absolute, complete and utter lack of meaningful sexual education in middle and high school.

Is this a joke? I thought France was on top of that kind of thing.

 daedalus wrote:

 djones520 wrote:

Not sure what your point is. Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

It's almost like you're just trying to tie this in with a school of thought that you don't like.

Is there an increase in casual sex?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I mean, there was this link showing that teen sex has actually decreased to the lowest since the 80s:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/health/teen-sex-rate/index.html

I note a strong correlation between skinny jeans and low sex rates.

Most syphilis cases were in people 20 to 29 years old.

 LethalShade wrote:

Relapse wrote:

 LethalShade wrote:
And yet France is known for its absolute, complete and utter lack of meaningful sexual education in middle and high school.

Is this a joke? I thought France was on top of that kind of thing.

Haha, because Everything Sounds Sexier in French ?

Nope, our sexual education is... Lacking, to say the least, and most figure it out by themselves. At least it was the case for me and most people I know. Most of the time, parents are the only ones informing about it.
(Common sense and basic intelligence can be a lifesaver )

 djones520 wrote:

 daedalus wrote:

 djones520 wrote:

Not sure what your point is. Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

It's almost like you're just trying to tie this in with a school of thought that you don't like.

Is there an increase in casual sex?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I mean, there was this link showing that teen sex has actually decreased to the lowest since the 80s:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/health/teen-sex-rate/index.html

I note a strong correlation between skinny jeans and low sex rates.

Most syphilis cases were in people 20 to 29 years old.

 LethalShade wrote:

 Peregrine wrote:

 djones520 wrote:
Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Casual sex alone isn't that dangerous, if you make use of the available options for reducing the risk. The real danger is when people are having casual sex without using those options, and abstinence-only "education" is a huge part of that. So if you want to keep STD rates down the place you need to be focusing is teaching people to have sex as safely as possible.

Well... Isn't it common sense ?

 Psienesis wrote:

 LethalShade wrote:

 Peregrine wrote:

 djones520 wrote:
Are you disagreeing with the notion that an increase in casual sex is directly tied to an increase in STD's?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Casual sex alone isn't that dangerous, if you make use of the available options for reducing the risk. The real danger is when people are having casual sex without using those options, and abstinence-only "education" is a huge part of that. So if you want to keep STD rates down the place you need to be focusing is teaching people to have sex as safely as possible.

Well... Isn't it common sense ?

Not in the US, where our schools are so riddled with religious-based ignorance that the only sex ed a lot of students get is based on the idea that they won't have sex, at all, ever, until they are married.