Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:00:41
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Seattle, WA
|
After seeing how successful the AdMech releases were, I can only imagine that any Sisters of Battle casts would sell insanely well. What do you think GW's reasoning is behind them not printing a whole army update (Dark Eldar is another great example)
|
ORKS IS MADE FOR FIGHTIN' AN WINNIN'
~10,000
~2,000
~5,000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:33:19
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Well, they did just let our one and only plastic kit go OOP, so there's that...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:37:26
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
Oz
|
Because they don't think the money invested in them will equal their returns. They're another power armour army with bolters, basically the bretonians of 40k.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:42:04
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
because GW doesn't do market research aka they are a poorly run company. It's their only majority female line, if they marketed that right they would bring in new player
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:43:46
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
I don't think they sell enough. And the people who do buy them seem to gladly pay for the metal? Most of the people I've seen with them are die hards with the hobby.
I honestly don't know, but if gw thought they could make a profit on them you know they would.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 04:54:01
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Because they really won't sell much either way.
People keep saying that a reboot like Dark Eldar would work, but how much did that reboot really sell?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 05:07:55
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Imperial Agent Provocateur
|
You know i am as tired of GW not renewing the sisters as much as the next guy but the reason they don't do it is because (from my POV) the other armies are making GW too much money. They probably think that there are too few sisters players to make a renewal feasable. This would be caused by lack of attention from GW. Which is caused by lack of money being spent on sisters...caused by lack of attention from GW and so on and so forth. Honestly I'm getting rid of my army so i can have some money to buy some Sisters of Silence when Forgeworld comes out with them. that way if SoB gets new models I can just use the Sisters of silence models. Ahhh Efficiency
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/12/12 14:19:16
1500pts Kabal of the Blood Moon
200pts Order of Ash and Silver
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 05:27:28
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 06:38:34
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
HoundsofDemos wrote:Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
And how do these numbers actually look?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 07:21:42
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Too less sales.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 07:23:56
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
And how do these numbers actually look?
Fun Fact about GW- It's really freaking hard to get good data on sales.
|
Q: What do you call a Dinosaur Handpuppet?
A: A Maniraptor |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 09:23:37
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Wasn't there a kickstarter that got a lot of funding for non-sob and non female IG models? If that worked well, maybe GW will see it and make theirs. And they could probably ask more for their models, then a small firm, plus the design costs for them are lower then for a small firm.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 11:23:09
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Crazy_Carnifex wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
And how do these numbers actually look?
Fun Fact about GW- It's really freaking hard to get good data on sales.
Then wouldn't saying how great Dark Eldar did after the reboot, as a defense for Sisters, be really odd?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 14:26:00
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Imperial Agent Provocateur
|
Makumba wrote:Wasn't there a kickstarter that got a lot of funding for non-sob and non female IG models? If that worked well, maybe GW will see it and make theirs. And they could probably ask more for their models, then a small firm, plus the design costs for them are lower then for a small firm.
I think i know what you're talking about. IIRC the Sisters of Eternal Mercy and Void Elves kickstarter made like 300k in the first couple of days and 800k to date.
And thats just to fund the project. Never mind actually buying the stuff. So either GW doesn't know about this (unlikely because i thought they had a lawsuit with the company over this) or they don't care. Either way they have their head up their
|
1500pts Kabal of the Blood Moon
200pts Order of Ash and Silver
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 14:47:39
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Crazy_Carnifex wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
And how do these numbers actually look?
Fun Fact about GW- It's really freaking hard to get good data on sales.
Then wouldn't saying how great Dark Eldar did after the reboot, as a defense for Sisters, be really odd?
I've always had the impression that the dark eldar 5th edition release did really well. Wyches especially always come up as a great kit for conversions, and there are several dark eldar players in my area. Just because we can't throw around sales numbers to support the idea that a faction did well doesn't mean that we should assume they did poorly.
I've found it quite odd, especially recently, that sisters don't get more love. After all, they've had GK in their own book for a while now, and the latest one is rather tiny. Sure they have lots of terminator armor, but it is still just another marine army with a few twists. They released the Millitarum Tempestus book, a book about unmodified humans equipped with above average gear, but still haven't seen fit to release sisters. They introduced the mechanicus books, which granted, the fans were calling for, and yet we still haven't seen them give the sister some love for a while now.
If we can have half a dozen books about marines in power armor, surely non-marines in power armor should have some appeal. If we can release a book about special ops unmodified humans with snazzy wargear, surely the entire sisters faction (and their technically-not-sisters buddies) should have a similar appeal with more variety. If we can introduce a faction of toughness 3 imperials with semi-elite stats and zany tech-based powers, surely we can release a book about semi-elite humans with zany faith-based powers.
I've always had the impression that there was a rather large "install base" for Sisters, and that the lack of plastic and (to a lesser extent) lack of rules support simply turned people away.
|
ATTENTION. Psychic tests are unfluffy. Your longing for AV is understandable but misguided. Your chapter doesn't need a separate codex. Doctrines should go away. Being a "troop" means nothing. This has been a cranky service announcement. You may now resume your regularly scheduled arguing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 14:58:57
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
I think it comes down to GW just not caring. If they cared, I think they'd push it and make a ton models with their new technical ability. I just don't think anyone there actually like the SOB.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 15:25:00
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I think they just genuinely don't know what people want.
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 15:25:48
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
pm713 wrote:I think they just genuinely don't know what people want.
Yeah, pretty much.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:03:38
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Thane of Dol Guldur
|
I think the concept of Battle Nuns is cool, but maybe the appeal is too limited to justify a revamp.
Hell, they never even printed their new codex in hardback.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:05:14
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
Not enough sales, and GW being utterly incompetent
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:06:58
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Because they really won't sell much either way.
People keep saying that a reboot like Dark Eldar would work, but how much did that reboot really sell?
This.
I bought a full DE army after the reboot, but I have never seen anyone else collect them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:09:44
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Martial Arts Fiday
|
They haven't yet figured out whether to make them all have Gravguns or D-weapons as standard weaponry.
|
"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"
-Nobody Ever
Proverbs 18:2
"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.
warboss wrote:
GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up. 
Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.
EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.
Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:14:26
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Because they are stupid people.
It would literally be possible to get away with making one kit. It wouldn't be a perfect solution, but one kit on the level of the Wych and DE Warrior kits would give a cheap way to build Celestian command squads, Celestians, Battle Sisters, Dominions and Retributors. You cannot in good faith say that there's not enough interest in the army to support even a single kit, not when, again, GW wasted more tooling than that on limited edition skull-shaped rocks for a game nobody asked for.
|
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-C.S. Lewis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:20:35
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Missouri
|
If GW made a kit like that, they'd charge $100 for it and then justify never making Sisters plastics again because no one bought it and they just don't know why.
|
Desubot wrote:Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.
"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:29:00
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
The reason sales for sisters are crap from GW's point of view is because the only realistic way to get a sisters army without a second morgage is ebay.
|
Kings of War RC |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:44:49
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I know in my local meta dark eldar sold very well when first released, we had a lot of interest.
These days with allies I find them worry about sales even more baffling. Even if people don't start entire sisters, I know a lot of people who would splash some into their current imperial armies via allies. I know I would want a squad or two. Look at how well knights sold as a one off kit, most people arn't running full knight armies they buy one as an allie.
GW is likely leaving a good amount on the table.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 16:59:06
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Stoic Grail Knight
|
I swear I'd heard before that the idea of re-doing sisters has been floated many times but been shot down by the upper management. They're just not interested in doing the army. Now that Kirby has been replaced from the CEO position, there might be an opportunity for Sisters to return.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 17:04:12
Subject: Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Stitch Counter
|
Because most boys who play with Sisters will have moved onto plastic dollies by now.....
mwahahahah
In all reality though, I just think the fanbase may be potentially be too small to justify the risk of doing it and taking a financial hit if not successful
|
Thousand Sons: 3850pts / Space Marines Deathwatch 5000pts / Dark Eldar Webway Corsairs 2000pts / Scrapheap Challenged Orks 1500pts / Black Death 1500pts
Saga: (Vikings, Normans, Anglo Danes, Irish, Scots, Late Romans, Huns and Anglo Saxons), Lion Rampant, Ronin: (Bushi x2, Sohei), Frostgrave: (Enchanter, Thaumaturge, Illusionist)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 17:11:02
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Missouri
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Crazy_Carnifex wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:Except in 5th a lot of people bought the new Dark Eldar, including people who just liked the models because they were cool models and the codex was competitive. If GW wrote good rules and released plastic kits, an all female army that can be tacked on via allies to any imperial army would sell.
And how do these numbers actually look?
Fun Fact about GW- It's really freaking hard to get good data on sales.
Then wouldn't saying how great Dark Eldar did after the reboot, as a defense for Sisters, be really odd?
Maybe, but no more odd than trying to suggest the army was a failure and that GW isn't doing Sisters now because of it, because likewise you have no data to back it up. If DE really didn't sell as well as they were expecting then I don't see why GW would have wasted their time putting out a hardback codex for them recently, as GW doesn't really tend to support lines that don't sell (hence why there are no Sisters plastics, and why it originally took GW over a decade to reboot DE in the first place and turn one of their worst-looking model ranges into one of their best).
DE aren't a popular army now because the newest codex is a piece of gak, and they hardly got any plastic to go with it, either; an $80 plane that doesn't perform any better than the existing $45 kit that everyone already bought, plastic wracks that aren't as useful anymore since they aren't usable as troops, and some plastic characters. But from what I understand the army sold well when it was released, and it was allegedly one of the reasons why GW went ahead and released several massive "waves" of them within just a few months of each other, instead of making it a typical codex release and just dumping some stuff initially with the codex and then leaving it at that until the next one in 5 years. I also remember, when GW was first rolling out Finecast and was only converting their most "popular" kits, the Dark Eldar metals were among the first to make the switch (and the first ones to get new Finecast sculpts to go with it).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/12 17:12:06
Desubot wrote:Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.
"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/12 17:13:50
Subject: Re:Serious - why don't you think GW will redo the Sisters line?
|
 |
Stitch Counter
|
Sidstyler wrote:
DE aren't a popular army now because the newest codex is a piece of gak, and they hardly got any plastic to go with it, either; an $80 plane that doesn't perform any better than the existing $45 kit that everyone already bought, plastic wracks that aren't as useful anymore since they aren't usable as troops, and some plastic characters. But from what I understand the army sold well when it was released, and it was allegedly one of the reasons why GW went ahead and released several massive "waves" of them within just a few months of each other, instead of making it a typical codex release and just dumping some stuff initially with the codex and then leaving it at that until the next one in 5 years. I also remember, when GW was first rolling out Finecast and was only converting their most "popular" kits, the Dark Eldar metals were among the first to make the switch (and the first ones to get new Finecast sculpts to go with it).
This, so much this. You probably didn't see my rant about DE treatment in the GW rumours thread but this is precisely why I am preparing to sell off my Dark Eldar.
|
Thousand Sons: 3850pts / Space Marines Deathwatch 5000pts / Dark Eldar Webway Corsairs 2000pts / Scrapheap Challenged Orks 1500pts / Black Death 1500pts
Saga: (Vikings, Normans, Anglo Danes, Irish, Scots, Late Romans, Huns and Anglo Saxons), Lion Rampant, Ronin: (Bushi x2, Sohei), Frostgrave: (Enchanter, Thaumaturge, Illusionist)
|
|
 |
 |
|