| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 13:26:01
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
Which one do you think has more potential for competition and why?
|
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 13:48:34
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
Gladius, easily. The Lion's Blade has Auxiliary choices that are easier to fit in at lower points levels, but its Formation/Detachment bonuses are much worse than those of the Gladius.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 14:39:08
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
Re-rollable jink detachment of cheeze vs gladius. Now that's the question.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 15:32:47
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
koooaei wrote:Re-rollable jink detachment of cheeze vs gladius. Now that's the question.
I'd still say Gladius, generally. I'll caveat that by admitting I haven't played with or against the RW SF.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 16:38:40
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Graham McNeil
Kaliningrad, Russia
|
Scout Move on GSF White Scars is certainly preferable.
Over watching with full BS is not coming in this handy, as close combat Is generally underpowered these days.
|
"It's called treachery, Roboute. It works very well." - Lorgar Aurelian. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 16:52:03
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Gladius is garbage for any CT except White Scars and Iron Hands.
Going to a Full Battle Company, the restrictions are nearly unworkable, and the benefit of free transports means you have to spend ridiculous amounts of points on mediocre, non-game-winning units to get more, free, mediocre non-game-winning units. Huzzah!
So, yeah, the Ravenwing is vastly better than BDC, Gladius, or GBC. There are no balls-out amazing formations for Marines, unless you really want to take 3-of something.  Since most CT's already have an offensive benefit regarding re-rolling attacks, the availability of Doctrines overlaps their abilities, for the most part.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/31 18:08:26
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
Ultras are solid in pod config with Sicarius. Iron Hands... huh? Having played IH back when every vehicle had IWND, I can tell you it is massively useless. Not a single time in all my games has it made a difference. Not one. And I had a crazy amount of tanks.
Huh? I can make it fit in 1500 pts without too much of a problem. You know you don't have to max out your squads to get the benefit of a full battle company, right?
greatbigtree wrote: and the benefit of free transports means you have to spend ridiculous amounts of points on mediocre, non-game-winning units to get more, free, mediocre non-game-winning units. Huzzah!
Individually, most units in a battle company are indeed nothing to write home about, but you just have so many bodies and tanks that most armies struggle to cope. And everything is ObSec, which is seriously painful to deal with for everyone save maybe Eldar.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/01 08:09:59
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
for IH under the ITC tanks still have iwnd.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/01 09:57:15
Subject: Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The Gladius is better because of the silly combo-power it has with White Scars and Kor'sarro Khan, while the Combat Doctrines are generally more applicable than full Ballistic Skill Overwatch.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/01 22:37:15
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Angelic Adepta Sororitas
|
greatbigtree wrote:Gladius is garbage for any CT except White Scars and Iron Hands.
Going to a Full Battle Company, the restrictions are nearly unworkable, and the benefit of free transports means you have to spend ridiculous amounts of points on mediocre, non-game-winning units to get more, free, mediocre non-game-winning units. Huzzah!
So, yeah, the Ravenwing is vastly better than BDC, Gladius, or GBC. There are no balls-out amazing formations for Marines, unless you really want to take 3-of something.  Since most CT's already have an offensive benefit regarding re-rolling attacks, the availability of Doctrines overlaps their abilities, for the most part.
Hah. I feel like you haven't played anyone good with a Gladius yet...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/01 23:09:39
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Miles City, MT
|
Ultras are solid in pod config with Sicarius. Iron Hands... huh? Having played IH back when every vehicle had IWND, I can tell you it is massively useless. Not a single time in all my games has it made a difference. Not one. And I had a crazy amount of tanks.
I agree with the IH comment. Even if you go by ITC Gladius with IH is trash. IWND is garbage on anything less than av13 vehicle wise. With ITC rules if going with vehicles you are better off running CAD with IH.
|
Twinkle, Twinkle little star.
I ran over your Wave Serpents with my car. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/03 00:08:50
Subject: Re:Lions blade vs gladius strike force.. which is more competitive?
|
 |
Rookie Pilot
Ohiowa
|
greatbigtree wrote:...spend ridiculous amounts of points on mediocre, non-game-winning units to get more, free, mediocre non-game-winning units.
I'm confused. You're gaining 500 points of obsec models (for free) which can move 18" per turn and are immune to s4 or less fire. How are free obsec units not literally winning you the game?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|