Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 01:31:05
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
|
Who is better to use in a competitve game? Yarrick or Straken?
Just from looking at the codex (no play testing yet) my vote is for Straken. Furious Charging/Fearless combined infantry squad with a decent close combat character seems worth it to me. Mix in a psyker, priest and power weapon sgts and this unit could be awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 07:32:59
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
The real answer is marbo.
|
3000 - 天空人民军队
1500
2000+ - The Sun'zu Cadre.
2000 Pt of Genestealers
1500 Pt of Sisters
'Serve the people'
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 08:33:19
Subject: Re:Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Wakefield
|
There is a slight issue with having just Straken, he can only be placed into a CCS, as he isn't an Independent Character when I look at the current army codex for AM. But if you really do want a beatstick for AM, Yarrick is always a blast, especially for blob squads, as he's an independent character! Also he can still issue orders I believe, and he's actually quite tough too, and he weilds a bloody POWER KLAW, that's pretty awesome
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 09:34:11
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
Yarikk is definitely more survivable and cheaper.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/02/11 09:34:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 16:20:20
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Rookie Pilot
Ohiowa
|
Yarrik. Cheaper, commissar benefits, more survivable, independent character, doesn't boost your hth which you're terribad at w/o allies anyway.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 17:19:59
Subject: Re:Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
|
It looks like I was off on this idea lol. As far as Yarrick, can he be your warlord? I have seen different opinions because of his rule about if a senior officer is in your army then a lord commissar cannot be the warlord.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 1833/02/11 19:04:49
Subject: Re:Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
greenterror88 wrote:It looks like I was off on this idea lol. As far as Yarrick, can he be your warlord? I have seen different opinions because of his rule about if a senior officer is in your army then a lord commissar cannot be the warlord.
Commissar Lords can't be Warlord unless no one has the rule Senior Officer which Yarrick has. Thus, he is the exeption.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 19:15:08
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge
|
Yeah, the senior officer rule and the Yarrick entry are not written very clearly.
Basically, when I use my IG, if I have a company commander in my list along with Yarrick then I make the company commander my warlord. If Yarrick is alone in my list without a company commander, then I make Yarrick my warlord.
This follows the IG's fluff since commissars are morale officers first and foremost. Commissars generally are not going to be issuing orders and they are not going to be in charge if an officer or sergeant is around (unless they shoot the officer or NCO). The Gaunt's Ghosts books do a great job of emphasizing that Gaunt, a commissar who is also an officer, is the exception rather than the norm.
My opponents have always been cool with this. I've brought Yarrick as my warlord (and I didn't bring any other HQ units like company command squads) to over a half dozen tournaments and no opponent has had a problem with Yarrick being my warlord. However, the senior officer rule and Yarrick's entry in the codex are so vaguely written, I bet most opponents would be perfectly OK with your declaring Yarrick your warlord even if you have a CCS in your list.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/02/11 19:17:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/11 20:55:47
Subject: Yarrick or Straken?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Olympia, WA
|
greenterror88 wrote:Who is better to use in a competitve game? Yarrick or Straken?
Just from looking at the codex (no play testing yet) my vote is for Straken. Furious Charging/Fearless combined infantry squad with a decent close combat character seems worth it to me. Mix in a psyker, priest and power weapon sgts and this unit could be awesome.
Straken is in my normal IG army. He's incredibly expensive and so i slap him in a chimera.
Yarrick can join untis and give ordrs so this is very cool. He doesnt do as much FOR his army as Straken does in the ROLE that i need so I choose Straken but I'd be hard pressed to tell anyone that Straken is "better". He's just better for an assault based blob army. =)
|
Hold out bait to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and then crush him.
-Sun Tzu, the Art of War
http://www.40kunorthodoxy.blogspot.com
7th Ambassadorial Grand Tournament Registration: http://40kambassadors.com/register.php |
|
 |
 |
|