Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/17 15:41:11
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
I'm a good player. Its not your list you need to beat me, its you being a better player than me.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 04:08:58
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
New Zealand
|
I generally do well with our local group (which is quite skilled and experienced) then panic and make dumb decisions at tournaments when I encounter deathstars or wraithknights. For the last 3 tourneys I've come exactly middle of the road.
|
6000pts
3000pts
1500pts
1000pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 07:48:38
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
One thing's for sure: I would be a better player if I didn't forget about units all the time
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 08:16:15
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
I've played over 120 matches of 7th now tournaments included, my winrate is 64%. I've kept a log since 7th hit. I'd say I'm a bit above average on that basis.
E: Fixed 65% to 64% as I failed at calculating first.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/03/18 08:17:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 08:47:51
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
Canada
|
to be upfront i know im not good at the game but its largely because i enjoy having fun with army design and bringing things i think would be cool. this often loses me games because i dont netlist i feel that thats a lazy way to build your army and its devoid of any "you" in it
|
DA army: 3500pts,
admech army: 600pts
ravenguard: 565 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 09:32:30
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Guildford
|
I'd be a lot better if I actually got enough games in. Unfortunately I don't have the time to fulfill the modelling side of things and neither my FLGS or I like unfinished models... It just looks weak. That being said, as a Blood Angels and, more recently, and Astra Militarum player, I don't exactly make things super easy for myself. I ten to play in non-competative games and win around 50% of the time, although never with ease.
I'm also one for fluff over effectiveness, but that's something I'm proud of.
|
3,500 (and building) ASM
3,000 Blood Angels
1500 Eldar (abandoned)
AoS - Beastclaw Raiders, Ironjawz, Night Goblins, and Ogors - Destruction remains unvanquished! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/18 10:43:54
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Angered Reaver Arena Champion
Connah's Quay, North Wales
|
I'm better at 40K then fantasy (we play 9th Age) and I'm a pretty good Fantasy player. But that makes sense because 40k is just soooo much easier then Fantasy and it's easy to apply the same logic to 40K.
On the other hand my list is pretty bad, but i do the best I can with my Dark Eldar and I can compete with the higher tier codexes regularly and win 60/40 if we play Maelstrom.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/29 23:41:29
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
ALEXisAWESOME wrote:I'm better at 40K then fantasy (we play 9th Age) and I'm a pretty good Fantasy player. But that makes sense because 40k is just soooo much easier then Fantasy and it's easy to apply the same logic to 40K.
On the other hand my list is pretty bad, but i do the best I can with my Dark Eldar and I can compete with the higher tier codexes regularly and win 60/40 if we play Maelstrom.
I stopped Fantasy b.c it was to easy and boring, I dont think I could apply anything Ive learned into 40k or vise versa. I was playing Tournaments till 6th Ed fantasy too, I even at the end of 6th and start of 7th went to Beastmen b.c it wasnt the same old boring thing and had a different play style (and was harder to play with).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/30 06:16:08
Subject: Re:How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Sneaky Lictor
Sacramento, CA
|
I'd be curious how good of a player I am in today's scene. I haven't played since 5th Ed and even won some guys w/ old Necrons. So, I can't suck too bad...
|
currently playing: ASoIaF | Warhammer 40k: Kill Team
other favorites:
FO:WW | RUMBLESLAM | WarmaHordes | Carnevale | Infinity | Warcry | Wrath of Kings
DQ:80S+G+M----B--IPwhfb11#--D++A++/wWD362R++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/03/30 06:53:38
Subject: Re:How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
I'm well above average. Few people can beat me.
I got hardly beaten in the last 10 years with my Eldar (ed. 4-6), Necrons (ed. 6) and Smurfs (ed. 4).
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/01 22:37:33
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
I'm trash at any sort of strategic turn-based game, with 40K probably being where I perform the worst. I partly blame this in that the rules don't match the fluff one iota, so I often pick units that I don't know are bad until I see them get trashed in the game.
I can generally hold my own in 1st person games, luckily, though there are still many above my skill there.
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/02 00:38:41
Subject: Re:How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Cackling Daemonic Dreadnought of Tzeentch
Ellenton, Florida
|
I must be freaking awesome at 40k.
I play pure Thousand Sons, and sometimes I win.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/02 00:45:05
Subject: How good do you think you are at 40k?
|
 |
Flashy Flashgitz
Armageddon
|
Well I pledged my soul to luck when I decided to play the orks so its really hard to tell.
X-wing I'm quite good at because stuff shoots when I tell it too. Sometimes the boyz just have an agenda of their own. I'd say I'm pretty solid though. I win like 50%
I kinda just play what I find fun/fluffy/cool. I'm not a fan of tournament WAAChammer and the power trippers it breeds.
|
"People say on their first meeting a Man and an Ork exchanged a long, hard look, didn't care much for what they saw, and shot each other dead." |
|
 |
 |
|