Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Trondheim wrote: Oh look another shooter game that seeks to take over from CoD or Battfield, how "intresting".
Oh look, Trondheim weighing in negatively on another game that is mainstream. How "interesting".
You do understand that Battlefield and Titanfall are published by the same company, right? And that they are two VERY different games in terms of playstyle?
Trondheim wrote: Oh look another shooter game that seeks to take over from CoD or Battfield, how "intresting".
Oh look, Trondheim weighing in negatively on another game that is mainstream. How "interesting".
You do understand that Battlefield and Titanfall are published by the same company, right? And that they are two VERY different games in terms of playstyle?
Well someone has to balance out your excitement with negativity And yes very Well aware of that fact my dear, and different? With the exception of the mech call in and wall running I dont find them any different from each other.
Trondheim wrote: Oh look another shooter game that seeks to take over from CoD or Battfield, how "intresting".
Oh look, Trondheim weighing in negatively on another game that is mainstream. How "interesting".
You do understand that Battlefield and Titanfall are published by the same company, right? And that they are two VERY different games in terms of playstyle?
Well someone has to balance out your excitement with negativity And yes very Well aware of that fact my dear, and different? With the exception of the mech call in and wall running I dont find them any different from each other.
Then I don't think you've actually played Battlefield or Titanfall, and kindly ask you to leave the thread.
It's great to want "balance out the excitement with negativity", but you don't have a history of doing that. You have a history of crap-posting over anything you don't like and then picking arguments.
And quite frankly? There is nothing to "balance out the excitement with negativity" at this point. It's excitement over the announcement of the game's existence. Very little is known or revealed yet, and if you think people need to have their excitement balanced out just because the game got announced? You need to rethink your priorities.
Well then you would be sorely wrong, and my priorites is that I like to wind up people from time. But anyhow, I will out of respekt for the OP Ask that we take any contuined disagreemt by Pm
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/04/12 16:26:02
I'm not sure how to feel about this. I liked titanfall's mechs for feeling more practical (not sure if this is the right word). I could see these mechs as a military unit rather than something from anime. Giants swords take away from the aesthetic titanfall was trying to achieve.
On the other hand, mechs with swords are cool.
Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today?
Can't wait for this, Titanfall is probably my favourite FPS (nothing to do with the fact it's one of the few I'm actually good at), all this has to do is build on the awesome first game and it can't go wrong.
Given that it looks like Titan melee weapons are confirmed, there's only a handful of things I'd love to see added. More Titan types (super fast and light with jetpack, 4 legged artillery Titan ect), some mode where you get to take the fight to all the set dressing alien beasties in the first game, maybe more unique guns like the Smart Pistol... Other than that, add stuff, change as little as possible and they're on to a winner!
some mode where you get to take the fight to all the set dressing alien beasties in the first game
It's funny you say that...there was a "Game with the Devs" event on Xbox awhile back and one of the devs mentioned that we actually were supposed to get a game mode like that. It ended up being too complicated to just bring it in, so instead it was canned.
I'm not sure how to feel about this. I liked titanfall's mechs for feeling more practical (not sure if this is the right word). I could see these mechs as a military unit rather than something from anime. Giants swords take away from the aesthetic titanfall was trying to achieve.
On the other hand, mechs with swords are cool.
From a 'kill another mech faster' standpoint, an upgraded melee would make sense. Perhaps not a giant sword or something, but maybe a blade in place of an arm/hand?
I just don't want Titanfall titan fights to turn into Armored Core lite.
Shadowkeepers (4000 points)
3rd Company (3000 points)
some mode where you get to take the fight to all the set dressing alien beasties in the first game
It's funny you say that...there was a "Game with the Devs" event on Xbox awhile back and one of the devs mentioned that we actually were supposed to get a game mode like that. It ended up being too complicated to just bring it in, so instead it was canned.
Interesting, I didn't know that. Hopefully if the idea was there then they can add it into the new game... what's the point of having a bunch of huge, cool aliens designed if you can't go all Pacific Rim on them in Titans?
Trondheim wrote: Oh look another shooter game that seeks to take over from CoD or Battfield, how "intresting".
Oh look, Trondheim weighing in negatively on another game that is mainstream. How "interesting".
You do understand that Battlefield and Titanfall are published by the same company, right? And that they are two VERY different games in terms of playstyle?
Huh. What about this point? How dare Respawn steal original ideas from those guys who made Call of Duty....?
The reason I never played the original was that multiplayer had so few players, I want battles 36vs36+ which is why I mostly played Battlefield. Is multiplayer going to have large games or still the tiny number the original had?
If you dont short hand your list, Im not reading it.
Example: Assault Intercessors- x5 -Thunder hammer and plasma pistol on sgt.
or Assault Terminators 3xTH/SS, 2xLCs
For the love of God, GW, get rid of reroll mechanics. ALL OF THEM!
Shadowkeepers (4000 points)
3rd Company (3000 points) 
And yes very Well aware of that fact my dear, and different? With the exception of the mech call in and wall running I dont find them any different from each other.
