Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:11:29
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Enginseer with a Wrench
|
Huh, nice. Wonder if there will a similar update bumping BA scouts to ws/bs 4...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:17:08
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Poor Hellbrutes.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:19:09
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Maybe when the CSM FAQ comes out.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:25:43
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
nudibranch wrote:Huh, nice. Wonder if there will a similar update bumping BA scouts to ws/ bs 4...
Or Space Wolves scouts being the same price as tactical marines but the with the same stats as vanilla scouts which are cheaper and troops.
|
"Hold my shoota, I'm goin in"
Armies (7th edition points)
7000+ Points Death Skullz
4000 Points
+ + 3000 Points "The Fiery Heart of the Emperor"
3500 Points "Void Kraken" Space Marines
3000 Points "Bard's Booze Cruise" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:29:20
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Don't helbrutes get buffs when they're enraged anyways?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 14:32:23
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Deadshot Weapon Moderati
|
Helbrutes will get a bonus +2A when it comes time to publish their FAQ, or maybe they'll just get it as part of a 7th edition book. Who knows? Reasonable people will let you play your Helbrutes as A4.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:04:25
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
I'd prefer them to just make an update to Codex: CSM. Helbrute lacking 2 attacks is the least of the army's problems right now.
Also, praying for the Orkz to get this too. I need an excuse to throw my money at Deff Dreads
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:13:28
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Deffs really just need a better way to survive getting to the enemy in relatively one piece. Faster movement or some way to improve their survivability would be outstanding for them (or both  )
|
"Hold my shoota, I'm goin in"
Armies (7th edition points)
7000+ Points Death Skullz
4000 Points
+ + 3000 Points "The Fiery Heart of the Emperor"
3500 Points "Void Kraken" Space Marines
3000 Points "Bard's Booze Cruise" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:16:10
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Jesus....could you screw Orks and CSM anymore GW?
|
Let a billion souls burn in death than for one soul to bend knee to a false Emperor.....
"I am the punishment of God, had you not committed great sin, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:16:46
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
You know, one of my simple pleasures in non-competitive 40k games has always been Murderfang in a FW Lucious Pattern Drop-Pod, and now it might be a competitive option too.
I've got a huge smile on my face. I've always loved Dreads from a fluff POV, and love seeing them help show some love to one of their iconic units.
|
11527pts Total (7400pts painted)
4980pts Total (4980pts painted)
3730 Total (210pts painted) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:24:47
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Did anyone ask for the Space Marine FAQ if the Iron Hands CT extends to non-Dread vehicles gaining IWND?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:37:02
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Did anyone ask for the Space Marine FAQ if the Iron Hands CT extends to non-Dread vehicles gaining IWND?
That question is specifically answered in the FAQ.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 15:56:45
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
ARGGGGH! WAIT FOR THE RELEVANT FAQ </shouting>
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:00:59
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Now I'm wondering, was it stated anywhere that these dreads could now be taken in squadrons or are they still playing highlander? EDIT: Obviously this would not extend to Bjorn or Murderfang since they're Unique units.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/20 16:01:21
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:02:42
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p30 Space Wolf FAQ
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Neronoxx wrote:Davor wrote: kodos wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:
Davor wrote: kodos wrote:Because they are not aware that they already changed some rules elsewhere
And if they did, it would be errata instead of FAQ.
You need to tell them in Facebook that their so called "rulebook FAQ" is actually an "rulebook errata" and not a FAQ
Nah. It looks like they already have enough problems with messages and deleting peoples comments. Remember rule number one for them. Be positive. 
Literally never have seen a comment deleted on their page, so I feel that either A) you were being a jerk, or B) you are being less than honest in regards to that statement.
I never posted there so I never got my comments deleted since I never posted. Just going by what others say of their comments being deleted even though they were not rude at all.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:09:01
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Now I'm wondering, was it stated anywhere that these dreads could now be taken in squadrons or are they still playing highlander?
EDIT: Obviously this would not extend to Bjorn or Murderfang since they're Unique units.
The Curse of the Wulfen edition of the Space Wolf dex allows vehicle squadrons, but not for Dreadnoughts, so no squadrons for Dreadnoughts yet.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:15:15
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Haemonculi Flesh Apprentice
|
casvalremdeikun wrote: MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Now I'm wondering, was it stated anywhere that these dreads could now be taken in squadrons or are they still playing highlander?
EDIT: Obviously this would not extend to Bjorn or Murderfang since they're Unique units.
The Curse of the Wulfen edition of the Space Wolf dex allows vehicle squadrons, but not for Dreadnoughts, so no squadrons for Dreadnoughts yet.
Ancients of the Fang allows for 2-5 dreads in a unit so its the same crap almost. Just imagine a 5 axe and shield unit all spread out running across that table lol.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:17:01
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
Interesting...this is the first final-draft FAQ. It's not a first draft, so it is official now. Anyone not using this rule is not playing the game correctly.
Question, I don't have the GK codex: Is a DreadKnight a Dreadnought?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/20 16:19:01
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:18:50
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Yes.
Yes they can
Orks and CSM are destined to be punching bags forever ya know.
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:21:52
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Desubot wrote:
Yes.
Yes they can
Orks and CSM are destined to be punching bags forever ya know.
Yes, but at least Orks have an awful lot of actual character to them, AND, a mostly modernised model line.
CSM's aren't even worth that much right now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:27:24
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Red Corsair wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote: MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Now I'm wondering, was it stated anywhere that these dreads could now be taken in squadrons or are they still playing highlander?
EDIT: Obviously this would not extend to Bjorn or Murderfang since they're Unique units.
The Curse of the Wulfen edition of the Space Wolf dex allows vehicle squadrons, but not for Dreadnoughts, so no squadrons for Dreadnoughts yet.
Ancients of the Fang allows for 2-5 dreads in a unit so its the same crap almost. Just imagine a 5 axe and shield unit all spread out running across that table lol.
Very true. Hopefully Blood Angels get a similar formation when they eventually get touched on again. Furioso Train of Murder is still possible with the Archangels Detachment though.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:28:39
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Huzzah! And I think the below sums it up best
Nevelon wrote:A victory for angry washing machines everywhere! Glad to see this. Not just because dreads are an iconic part of the lore and need to be treated a bit better. But it shows that GW is open to actually errataing things that need to be fixed, rather then just ignoring problems until they re-do the codex in 2-15 years.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:31:55
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Okay so what about everyone else? This helps the most powerful faction in the game get stronger.
So what about the little guys? Poor Dark Eldar, Chaos Space Marines, Imperial Guard, Orks, and Tyranids. I would like to see all the races back on the tabletop competitively again.
I would also like to see the gakky units in Tau and Necrons buffed up a bit to make them more viable choices.
Poor fething hellbrutes.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/20 16:32:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:35:46
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Gamgee wrote:Okay so what about everyone else? This helps the most powerful faction in the game get stronger.
What? The most powerful faction in the game is not Space Wolves, Blood Angels, or Grey Knights. Space Wolves are upper middle tier, and Grey Knights are low mid tier at best.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:40:37
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The ITC tournaments and space marine death stars beg to differ. Space Wolf deathstars are dominating the scene badly. To the point the power creep is so bad they are better than Eldar now. That's how far Space Marine power creep has set in.
Grey Knights taken with allies do wonders and place fairly well in ITC tournaments as well.
Only the Blood Angels truly needed it. When it comes time to buff the weaker factions and weaker units in better factions codices I hope the marine players are as generous with everyone else as themselves.
Surely everyone on the internet can be reasonable... right?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/20 16:40:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:42:15
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Thanks for letting me know. Iron Hands are definitely one of the strongest Gladius builds now.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:45:00
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Gamgee wrote:The ITC tournaments and space marine death stars beg to differ. Space Wolf deathstars are dominating the scene badly. To the point the power creep is so bad they are better than Eldar now. That's how far Space Marine power creep has set in.
Grey Knights taken with allies do wonders and place fairly well in ITC tournaments as well.
Only the Blood Angels truly needed it. When it comes time to buff the weaker factions and weaker units in better factions codices I hope the marine players are as generous with everyone else as themselves.
Surely everyone on the internet can be reasonable... right?
Cherrypicking TWC, Draigo, and Sanguinary Priests for deathstars doesn't mean the codices are good. All it means is that Army of the Imperium and Battle Brothers are the best special rules in the game.
And buffing Dreads isn't going to make any of these armies more tournament viable. Dreads still get blown up and/or immobilized way too easily for 2 more Attacks to boost their tournament results.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:46:13
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Gamgee wrote:Okay so what about everyone else? This helps the most powerful faction in the game get stronger.
So what about the little guys? Poor Dark Eldar, Chaos Space Marines, Imperial Guard, Orks, and Tyranids. I would like to see all the races back on the tabletop competitively again.
I would also like to see the gakky units in Tau and Necrons buffed up a bit to make them more viable choices.
Poor fething hellbrutes.
This is more of an errata than a balancing fix. Those kind of fixes will need to wait for a true codex update. Also I'm sure if enough people raise a stink about the Deff Dread and Helbrutes' Attacks, they'll change those too once they get around to it.
Incidentally I'm writing several emails to them since I no longer use facebook
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:47:30
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
I don’t think boosting dreads is going to do much to change external codex balance. Top dogs are going to stay that way, and buffing dreads is not going to magically make them tournament caliber.
What it does is helps internal balance a bit. They become a slightly better choice, rather then just a trap pick. Still probably only going to be found on friendly tables.
It also helps to keep things consistent. It makes no sense that the paintjob affects the number of attacks, for what is fundamentally the same thing. This is an ongoing problem ever since the different chapters got non-supplemental books.
And yes, CSM hellbrutes should probably get some love as well. But I can understand that they might not want to include them in this blanket sweep. Hopefully they will get something later.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/20 16:51:15
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Oh you only have the best rules in the game to win. Okay carry on then. My Dark Eldar will just sit over here as you get free buffs.
So is that a yes or no to buffing other factions? What happens when it comes time to buff the Tau? Would you be okay if they made Kroot good in assault and melee again? How about if they buff our heavy rail rifle to str 9 and armorbane? And add armor bane to all of our railguns?
It's not likely to see competitive Tau usage, but would it still be okay?
Or how about if Dark Eldar were given a faction wide ability to jink and shoot due to their insane agility and accuracy even beyond their light kin? Would you be okay with that?
I just hope GW keeps on the path its going and buffs every weak faction and also the weakest units from all the factions a little. I don't need anything too insane here. The weaker the faction the more buffs it should get. In theory. I really hope it doesn't give into the largest group of players ideas for a fair and balanced game.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/20 16:51:40
|
|
 |
 |
|