Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
And I notice that you ignored the question of what terrifying things you think Hillary is going to do that justify voting for someone so obviously horrible and incompetent as Trump.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Asterios wrote: and are you referring to this Civil case which was dismissed in California, and is now currently in New York and happened over 20 years ago? you do realize anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason.
Yes, that's why I said accused, not convicted. You know, kind of like Hillary has been accused of breaking the law with the email "scandal" but has not been convicted of anything.
Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation. as to trump being Racist, fine Hillary is racist:
and those are her words praising a card carrying leader of the KKK as her mentor and such. and what makes it worse she praised him, unlike trump who just didn't knock them down, and you know what he has my praise for that since its not his job to judge people and their beliefs nor is it the Governments. now if he praised them thats another story but he did not.
as to Trump being racist I'll listen to Ben Stein over the much Hillary sucking up of the Huffington Post
You can never use facts against anyone who doesn't think Trump is racist, it's a lost cause at that point. The less people argue with these kind of folks, the less they will reply, and then I have to read fewer of their posts which means we all win at the end.
Asterios wrote: Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation.
Hillary is also being investigated for a rather boring "crime" that only conservatives care about (and only as an opportunity to attack the democrats), while Trump is accused of something much more horrifying, big difference. And yes, there is no police investigation because it is a civil suit where the statute of limitations on criminal charges has expired. The lack of an FBI investigation says nothing about the credibility of the accusation.
And I notice that you again ignore the question of what you think that Hillary intends to do that is scary enough to justify voting for Trump. Even if you ignore the rape accusation and pretend that he isn't a racist he's still incompetent. His only claimed qualification for the job is his business experience, and when his businesses aren't outright frauds they're making a mediocre return on his investment at best. So what about Hillary makes this level of incompetence look appealing?
As for racism, I'm going to have to concede the point to d-usa. If you can't see how the guy who is campaigning on "build a wall to keep the Mexicans from stealing our jobs" could possibly be accused of being racist then I don't know what else to say.
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices.
Asterios wrote: Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation.
Hillary is also being investigated for a rather boring "crime" that only conservatives care about (and only as an opportunity to attack the democrats), while Trump is accused of something much more horrifying, big difference. And yes, there is no police investigation because it is a civil suit where the statute of limitations on criminal charges has expired. The lack of an FBI investigation says nothing about the credibility of the accusation.
And I notice that you again ignore the question of what you think that Hillary intends to do that is scary enough to justify voting for Trump. Even if you ignore the rape accusation and pretend that he isn't a racist he's still incompetent. His only claimed qualification for the job is his business experience, and when his businesses aren't outright frauds they're making a mediocre return on his investment at best. So what about Hillary makes this level of incompetence look appealing?
As for racism, I'm going to have to concede the point to d-usa. If you can't see how the guy who is campaigning on "build a wall to keep the Mexicans from stealing our jobs" could possibly be accused of being racist then I don't know what else to say.
problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
as to minor, so you think letting State secrets out is minor? typical liberal thinking there, as to Hillary, where do I start? well her stance to let more illegals into the country and make them citizens, as far as i'm concerned don't care what race, religion, sex or whatever, you come into this country illegally you are breaking the law and should be kicked out with expedience.
Then there is her anti-gun rhetoric, which I will not stand behind, and her standing by the ACA which is still a disaster.plus her plans to tax everyone (other then the poor) to pay for her pie in the sky dreams of free 4 year college. then there was her foreign policy disasters and Benghazi, and then there is that whole letting state secrets out on an unsecured service which really sticks in my craw.
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
You got that right! Sadly, it's the same phenomenon that made Brexit a reality, that made Trump the GOP POTUS candidate.
Sort of, not really....
One article I read stated that the majority of people who voted for leaving, were older Brits... likely those who were retired, or about to. The majority who voted for staying were younger, in the early/middle stages of a career.
A friend of mine from my rugby club posted an article stating that the divide between educated and uneducated was similar... those without 4+ year college degrees voted to leave, while those with degrees voted predominately to stay.
You don't really see the same kind of age divide in the US, while you do see it in the education levels.
Actually, I think it's the fact that the older voters *remembers* what UK was like pre-EU.
Whereas the younger generation has no frame of reference and thus don't want to rock the status quo.
Much like how the older Republicans yearn for the so-called glory days of Reagan and the Democrats yearn for the so-called glory days of (Bill) Clinton, when everything was sunshine and rainbows and unicorn farts?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 02:20:03
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks
Asterios wrote: Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation.
Hillary is also being investigated for a rather boring "crime" that only conservatives care about (and only as an opportunity to attack the democrats), while Trump is accused of something much more horrifying, big difference. And yes, there is no police investigation because it is a civil suit where the statute of limitations on criminal charges has expired. The lack of an FBI investigation says nothing about the credibility of the accusation.
And I notice that you again ignore the question of what you think that Hillary intends to do that is scary enough to justify voting for Trump. Even if you ignore the rape accusation and pretend that he isn't a racist he's still incompetent. His only claimed qualification for the job is his business experience, and when his businesses aren't outright frauds they're making a mediocre return on his investment at best. So what about Hillary makes this level of incompetence look appealing?
As for racism, I'm going to have to concede the point to d-usa. If you can't see how the guy who is campaigning on "build a wall to keep the Mexicans from stealing our jobs" could possibly be accused of being racist then I don't know what else to say.
problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
.
He was a member of the KKK. Then he quit, apologized numerous times for his involvement with them, then promoted the Civil Rights Act and many other acts for equality. Buuuuut, just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. It really works.
Asterios wrote: problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
You mean the guy who was in the KKK in his "young and stupid" days, admitted that he was completely wrong back then, and fought against racism later in his life? Do you really see that as comparable to "our top priority should be building a wall to keep all the icky brown people out"?
as to minor, so you think letting State secrets out is minor?
Yes, given that Hillary didn't let state secrets out (she arguably put them in a vulnerable location but that's not the same thing as leaking/publishing them) and she had, as part of her job, the ability to remove the "secret" status from the information. This is not a case of selling our important secrets to China.
well her stance to let more illegals into the country and make them citizens
Do you not see a contradiction between "illegals" and "citizens"? If immigrants are allowed into the country and allowed to become citizens then they are no longer illegal immigrants.
as far as i'm concerned don't care what race, religion, sex or whatever, you come into this country illegally you are breaking the law and should be kicked out with expedience.
That's a nice theory, but in practice it will never happen. Too many businesses (many of them owned by conservatives) depend on illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, and both parties know that the economic disruption would not be worth any supposed benefits from removing them (if you could even do it without spending obscene amounts of money). And, more importantly, it's the kind of theory that has no practical effect on your life. Hillary is not going to destroy the country by continuing business as usual as it has existed under presidents from both parties.
Then there is her anti-gun rhetoric
Rhetoric which has little to do with actual laws. Democrats will often talk about gun control, but make no meaningful attempt to get any laws passed. The only people who are going to be hurt by Hillary becoming president are people who want to buy new AR-15s but can't because all of the panic buys stripped the inventory from every gun store in the country. You know, just like what happened when Obama was about to be elected and people were talking about his anti-gun rhetoric.
and her standing by the ACA which is still a disaster
I'll grant you this. If you oppose the ACA you want Trump instead of Hillary. But I am extremely skeptical of any claim that the ACA continuing to exist has more of a negative impact on you than things like the potential for Trump's incompetence damaging the economy.
plus her plans to tax everyone (other then the poor) to pay for her pie in the sky dreams of free 4 year college.
What is so scary about increased funding for education? Is it really so much worse than the prospect of increasing taxes to pay for a border wall?
then there was her foreign policy disasters and Benghazi
You mean the "scandal" where investigation after investigation found nothing to blame her for, and the whole thing continued way longer than it had any sane reason to do because the republican party wanted to use it for partisan politics?
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices.
Asterios wrote: Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation.
Hillary is also being investigated for a rather boring "crime" that only conservatives care about (and only as an opportunity to attack the democrats), while Trump is accused of something much more horrifying, big difference. And yes, there is no police investigation because it is a civil suit where the statute of limitations on criminal charges has expired. The lack of an FBI investigation says nothing about the credibility of the accusation.
And I notice that you again ignore the question of what you think that Hillary intends to do that is scary enough to justify voting for Trump. Even if you ignore the rape accusation and pretend that he isn't a racist he's still incompetent. His only claimed qualification for the job is his business experience, and when his businesses aren't outright frauds they're making a mediocre return on his investment at best. So what about Hillary makes this level of incompetence look appealing?
As for racism, I'm going to have to concede the point to d-usa. If you can't see how the guy who is campaigning on "build a wall to keep the Mexicans from stealing our jobs" could possibly be accused of being racist then I don't know what else to say.
problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
.
He was a member of the KKK. Then he quit, apologized numerous times for his involvement with them, then promoted the Civil Rights Act and many other acts for equality. Buuuuut, just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. It really works.
He said he doesn't care about old stuff like the accusations against Trump from such a long time ago, he only brings up recent stuff like KKK memberships.
Edit: wasn't Trump born after the KKK membership was dropped?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 02:35:55
Asterios wrote: Hillary has the FBI investigating her, no law enforcement is investigating Trump for Rape, big difference, you reek of desperation.
Hillary is also being investigated for a rather boring "crime" that only conservatives care about (and only as an opportunity to attack the democrats), while Trump is accused of something much more horrifying, big difference. And yes, there is no police investigation because it is a civil suit where the statute of limitations on criminal charges has expired. The lack of an FBI investigation says nothing about the credibility of the accusation.
And I notice that you again ignore the question of what you think that Hillary intends to do that is scary enough to justify voting for Trump. Even if you ignore the rape accusation and pretend that he isn't a racist he's still incompetent. His only claimed qualification for the job is his business experience, and when his businesses aren't outright frauds they're making a mediocre return on his investment at best. So what about Hillary makes this level of incompetence look appealing?
As for racism, I'm going to have to concede the point to d-usa. If you can't see how the guy who is campaigning on "build a wall to keep the Mexicans from stealing our jobs" could possibly be accused of being racist then I don't know what else to say.
problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
.
He was a member of the KKK. Then he quit, apologized numerous times for his involvement with them, then promoted the Civil Rights Act and many other acts for equality. Buuuuut, just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. It really works.
you mean like this?
Byrd was a member of the wing of the Democratic Party that opposed desegregation and civil rights imposed by the federal government. However, despite his early career in the KKK, Byrd was linked to such senators as John C. Stennis, J. William Fulbright and George Smathers, who based their segregationist positions on their view of states' rights in contrast to senators like James Eastland, who held a reputation as a committed racist. Byrd joined with Democratic senators to filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Byrd also opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
also he was a recruiter, for the KKK and even a leader of his local chapter, but because he said hes sorry we should forgive him? so if a killer says hes sorry we should forgive him? if a racist says hes sorry we should forgive him ? and the list goes on and on.
so what your saying anything in your candidates past does not exist or matter, but anything in Trumps past should be used against him?
Asterios wrote: problem is I see Hillary more as a racist then Trump, but then again what do you expect when she praises her good friend and mentor a card carrying KKK leader?
You mean the guy who was in the KKK in his "young and stupid" days, admitted that he was completely wrong back then, and fought against racism later in his life? Do you really see that as comparable to "our top priority should be building a wall to keep all the icky brown people out"?
so he wants to protect our borders on the biggest entry point for illegals, don't think any color was mentioned or as you said "icky Brown People"
as to minor, so you think letting State secrets out is minor?
Yes, given that Hillary didn't let state secrets out (she arguably put them in a vulnerable location but that's not the same thing as leaking/publishing them) and she had, as part of her job, the ability to remove the "secret" status from the information. This is not a case of selling our important secrets to China.
you do realize Wikileaks has her e-mails and such, and thats tantamount to them getting out.
well her stance to let more illegals into the country and make them citizens
Do you not see a contradiction between "illegals" and "citizens"? If immigrants are allowed into the country and allowed to become citizens then they are no longer illegal immigrants.
and yet that is not what i want, if they want to come to this country do it legally, not by breaking the law and and person who enters this country illegally should be kicked out., but then there you go avoiding the breaking the law part.
as far as i'm concerned don't care what race, religion, sex or whatever, you come into this country illegally you are breaking the law and should be kicked out with expedience.
That's a nice theory, but in practice it will never happen. Too many businesses (many of them owned by conservatives) depend on illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labor, and both parties know that the economic disruption would not be worth any supposed benefits from removing them (if you could even do it without spending obscene amounts of money). And, more importantly, it's the kind of theory that has no practical effect on your life. Hillary is not going to destroy the country by continuing business as usual as it has existed under presidents from both parties.
might not be able to remove all of them but removing as many of them as possible is a step in the right direction, not making them legal.
Rhetoric which has little to do with actual laws. Democrats will often talk about gun control, but make no meaningful attempt to get any laws passed. The only people who are going to be hurt by Hillary becoming president are people who want to buy new AR-15s but can't because all of the panic buys stripped the inventory from every gun store in the country. You know, just like what happened when Obama was about to be elected and people were talking about his anti-gun rhetoric.
you mean like Trumps plans to build a wall, so far everything you have said is reason for you to vote for Trump.
and her standing by the ACA which is still a disaster
I'll grant you this. If you oppose the ACA you want Trump instead of Hillary. But I am extremely skeptical of any claim that the ACA continuing to exist has more of a negative impact on you than things like the potential for Trump's incompetence damaging the economy.
and after her Pan-Pacific pact set to go into effect soon you think she has any qualifications?
then there was her foreign policy disasters and Benghazi
You mean the "scandal" where investigation after investigation found nothing to blame her for, and the whole thing continued way longer than it had any sane reason to do because the republican party wanted to use it for partisan politics?
she may have not been found to be blamed, but she was still incompetent as far as i'm concerned.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 02:57:16
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
Didn't we already talk about this? Something about how he felt about the fact that he had black accountants...I think the relevant quote was 'the only guys I want counting my money are short guys who wear yarmulkes all day.'
d-usa wrote: You can never use facts against anyone who doesn't think Drumpf is racist, it's a lost cause at that point. The less people argue with these kind of folks, the less they will reply, and then I have to read fewer of their posts which means we all win at the end.
And I thought I wasn't going to win my game of logical fallacies bingo sheet.
Now all I have to do is wait for tu quorque, slippery slope, black and white, and the burden of proof fallacies. Oh boy can't wait.
North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un has hailed the test flight of a new ballistic missile as a “great event”, and evidence of the country’s “sure capability” of hitting US targets in the Pacific.
Mr Kim’s boast followed an apparently successful test of the Musudan medium-range missile, after five previous tests in recent months failed.
The first of two missiles fired on Wednesday also failed, but the second flew around 400km (250 miles), reached an altitude of 1,000km (620 miles) and came down in the Sea of Japan.
The test launches have triggered serious concerns in the US, Japan and South Korea, as the missile’s potential range of 3,500km (2,180 miles), puts significant areas of Asia and the Pacific, including US military bases in Guam, within firing range.
“We have the sure capability to attack in an overall and practical way the Americans in the Pacific operation theatre,” North Korea’s official news agency KCNA quoted Mr Kim as saying.
The United Nations Security Council has condemned the tests after an emergency meeting was held to discuss its response.
UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon, said the missile launch was a “brazen and irresponsible act”.
Mr Ban’s spokesman, Faran Haq, described the tests as a “deliberate and very grave violation” of security council resolutions banning the country from using ballistic missiles.
North Korea’s continuing pursuit of these weapons and nuclear weapons “will only undermine its security and fail to improve the lives of its citizens”, he added.
Tokyo has expressed its concern about the “certain level of capability” North Korea now poses with working ballistic missiles. “The threat to Japan is intensifying,” said defence minister Gen Nakatani.
“We have to see it as a success,” Lee Choon Geun, an analyst at South Korea's state-funded Science and Technology Policy Institute, told Associated Press. “No other (previous) missiles fired by North Korea have ever flown that high.”
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said: “The impact of these provocations will be to only strengthen the resolve of the international community that has such serious concerns with North Korea’s behaviour.
“The United States will do what we have done in the past, which is work with the international community, particularly our allies in South Korea and Japan.”
The successful launch of the Musudan ballistic missile is one of a series of breakthroughs North Korea has claimed in its continuing efforts to create a long-range nuclear weapons arsenal capable of attacking the US mainland.
From United States Strategic Command Facebook Page in reaction:
United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) systems detected and tracked what we assess were two North Korean missile launches at 10:56 a.m. Hawaii time and 1:03 p.m. Hawaii time, June 21, 2016. The launch of two presumed Musudan intermediate range ballistic missiles occurred at Wonsan.
The missiles were tracked over the Sea of Japan, where initial indications are that they fell.
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) determined the missile launches from North Korea did not pose a threat to North America.
We strongly condemn this and other North Korean missile tests in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions, which explicitly prohibit North Korea's use of ballistic missile technology.
We are closely monitoring the situation on the Korean Peninsula in coordination with our regional allies.
We urge North Korea to refrain from provocative actions that aggravate tensions and instead focus on fulfilling its international obligations and commitments.
Pretty interesting what this will have in the next 5 years.
Didn't we already talk about this? Something about how he felt about the fact that he had black accountants...I think the relevant quote was 'the only guys I want counting my money are short guys who wear yarmulkes all day.'
In each instance, Drumpf sought to project both strength and a lack of concern for the reaction to his provocative rhetoric, calculating that both would help him rise in the polls during the Republican primary. Indeed, a majority of Republican voters agreed with Drumpf's call to temporarily ban all foreign Muslims from entering the United States.
Can also watch the video about him saying that too. He is equally racist to Mexicans, Muslims, and basically anyone that isn't white and male.
The guy is well known to be racist and sexist. Can't really defend the guy at all.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 02:43:59
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war.
d-usa wrote: You can never use facts against anyone who doesn't think Trump is racist, it's a lost cause at that point. The less people argue with these kind of folks, the less they will reply, and then I have to read fewer of their posts which means we all win at the end.
Has engaging really worked, though? All that has done is allow him to suck all the air out of every thread he's in with the usual barrage of nonsense, goalpost-moving, and flat out lies. How many threads needs to get locked due to that behavior?
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
Asterios wrote: also he was a recruiter, for the KKK and even a leader of his local chapter, but because he said hes sorry we should forgive him? so if a killer says hes sorry we should forgive him? if a racist says hes sorry we should forgive him ?
You do realize those are entirely different things, correct?
Wait wait, better question, if you are a racist and say/do racist things at some point in your life, you should be condemned for the rest of your life?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 02:51:14
Didn't we already talk about this? Something about how he felt about the fact that he had black accountants...I think the relevant quote was 'the only guys I want counting my money are short guys who wear yarmulkes all day.'
[MOD EDIT - Removed as it was deemed Inappropriate -. Alpharius]
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/07/03 13:44:33
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
Asterios wrote: also he was a recruiter, for the KKK and even a leader of his local chapter, but because he said hes sorry we should forgive him? so if a killer says hes sorry we should forgive him? if a racist says hes sorry we should forgive him ?
You do realize those are entirely different things, correct?
Wait wait, better question, if you are a racist and say/do racist things at some point in your life, you should be condemned for the rest of your life?
Matters on the occasion. IF you are catholic before the reformation and you paid the church enough... Then no! You are absolved!
But thats rhetorical.
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war.
Asterios wrote: also he was a recruiter, for the KKK and even a leader of his local chapter, but because he said hes sorry we should forgive him? so if a killer says hes sorry we should forgive him? if a racist says hes sorry we should forgive him ?
You do realize those are entirely different things, correct?
Wait wait, better question, if you are a racist and say/do racist things at some point in your life, you should be condemned for the rest of your life?
No, no, if you say them to work racist people into a lather so they vote for you, but don't really mean them, it's totally cool.
Didn't we already talk about this? Something about how he felt about the fact that he had black accountants...I think the relevant quote was 'the only guys I want counting my money are short guys who wear yarmulkes all day.'
[MOD EDIT - Removed as it was deemed Inappropriate -. Alpharius].
Hoooooooooooooooooooooly crap.
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/07/03 13:44:59
Can also watch the video about him saying that too. He is equally racist to Mexicans, Muslims, and basically anyone that isn't white and male.
The guy is well known to be racist and sexist. Can't really defend the guy at all.
didn't know Muslim was a race? or Mexican? and yet the Muslim Religion has people of all races in it, even white, and the Mexican culture, also has many people of other races including blond haired blue eyed white skinned Mexicans, so sounds like you are the racist here.
in other words learn what racism is. not what you think it is.
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
Says the guy that just said "Jews are known for being good with money." Where did you learn that, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
in other words learn what racism is. not what you think it is.
Is this like that time a couple pages ago where you were wrong and when corrected you told that person "to go back to school" by trying to prove you were right even though you were still wrong?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/25 03:12:25
d-usa wrote: "When the Internet sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending posters that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing strawmen. They're bringing spam. They're trolls. And some, I assume, are good people."
Asterios wrote: [MOD EDIT - Removed as it was deemed Inappropriate -. Alpharius]
"Hey guys, it's just a generalization and totally not a racial stereotype".
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/07/03 13:45:48
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices.
Asterios wrote: if you are going to quote me then quote the whole thing I said
What I put in quotes is arguably better than what you wrote.
its not what I say, its what some say, even family Guy has done a stint on this whole thing too.
Holy gak... "It's not what I say, it's what some people say... even though I just said it."
d-usa wrote: "When the Internet sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending posters that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing strawmen. They're bringing spam. They're trolls. And some, I assume, are good people."
The 'some people' in 'some people say' might be a teeeeeeeeny bit racist. A tip - if you find yourself espousing the same viewpoint as Eric Cartman, you're almost certainly in the wrong.
Family Guy, on the other hand, is well-known for being a bastion of sensitivity and good taste, and I'm glad we get our knowledge about what is and isn't racist from it.
All I know is when Trump wins in November I will be saying told you so, do i think he will be a good president? no, but he will be better then Hillary and my family votes Democrat so what does that tell you.
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
Asterios wrote: All I know is when Trump wins in November I will be saying told you so, do i think he will be a good president? no, but he will be better then Hillary and my family votes Democrat so what does that tell you.
That your Thanksgiving is going to be a lot of fun?
Asterios wrote: if you are going to quote me then quote the whole thing I said
What I put in quotes is arguably better than what you wrote.
its not what I say, its what some say, even family Guy has done a stint on this whole thing too.
Holy gak... "It's not what I say, it's what some people say... even though I just said it."
can't win so you insult, congrats whatever you want to believe, you believe it, what I want to believe I will believe and neither the twain shall meet.
Asterios wrote: All I know is when Trump wins in November I will be saying told you so, do i think he will be a good president? no, but he will be better then Hillary and my family votes Democrat so what does that tell you.
That your Thanksgiving is going to be a lot of fun?
most of my family went with Sanders and are strongly in the anyone but Hillary camp. so they might go Jill stein or such. me i'm gonna put my vote where it will do the most good of her not winning.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/06/25 03:20:48
Thinks Palladium books screwed the pooch on the Robotech project.
Asterios wrote: All I know is when Trump wins in November I will be saying told you so, do i think he will be a good president? no, but he will be better then Hillary and my family votes Democrat so what does that tell you.
No one cares.
Do us all a favor and please stop dragging this thread down the gakker.
d-usa wrote: "When the Internet sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending posters that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing strawmen. They're bringing spam. They're trolls. And some, I assume, are good people."
