| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 14:42:05
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Hey,
I've decided to build Skiitari as a secondary army. Nobody at my club plays them in force and I just want a casual army to bring to the club on off days.
Love the look and shooting quality of Skiitari Rangers and the tanks.
This is what I was thinking about building.
3x Onager Dunecrawler each with Phospher Blasters
3x Ranger Squad /w 3x Plasma Calivers Each
3x Ranger Squad /w 3x Arc Rifles Each
Gives me lots of ap2 and ap3 shooting and the ability to down vehicles. 1500 on the dot..
What do you think?
Also can someone explain to me why trans arq's are 25 points? at ap3 and 4+ to wound and only strng 4 plus armorbane they seem incredibly weak.
|
hey what time is it?
"Try looking on page 12 of the FAQ."
-Ghaz |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 15:21:39
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You're mostly paying for the range of the Arq.
Also switch out all the Rangers with Plasma into Vanguard with Plasma.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 16:48:29
Subject: Re:Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
If you want plasma give them to Vanguard, Rangers are better off sitting in the back field holding an objective putting shots down range with the arquebus, they may be slightly overcast it but if you roll a six to wound they become AP2 and I have seen them pop light Vehicles before.
|
19th Krieg Siege Army 7500pts.
40k/HH Night Lords 5000pts.
Orks Waaaghmacht Spearhead 2500pts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 17:11:19
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:You're mostly paying for the range of the Arq.
Also switch out all the Rangers with Plasma into Vanguard with Plasma.
That would only require 18 boxes of troops to get the plasma for 6 units...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 18:55:56
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Snivelling Workbot
|
If you are planning to get Onagers for Phospher blast then I think Kastellan Robot Maniple with twinlinked Phospher Blast upgrades are better than 3x Onagers. Someone did the math in skitarri discussion.
Also robos are really good at CC as well.
I know robos are not skitarii but they are still Ad Mech.
|
Noc Est Forma in Morte |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/13 19:58:37
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Zalek wrote:If you are planning to get Onagers for Phospher blast then I think Kastellan Robot Maniple with twinlinked Phospher Blast upgrades are better than 3x Onagers.
I agree.
I think the phospor blasters on the Onager might be the least competitive option. You said you weren't interested in being competitive, but your list could deal with a wider range of targets with neutron lasers and if you expect any flyers the icarus array is really good.
Should magnetize the Onagers.
|
Sekhmet - Dynasty 4000pts Greenwing - 2000pts Deathguard - 1500pts Daemons of Nurgle - 1000pts ~320pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/14 06:54:49
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Truth118 wrote:Zalek wrote:If you are planning to get Onagers for Phospher blast then I think Kastellan Robot Maniple with twinlinked Phospher Blast upgrades are better than 3x Onagers.
I agree.
I think the phospor blasters on the Onager might be the least competitive option. You said you weren't interested in being competitive, but your list could deal with a wider range of targets with neutron lasers and if you expect any flyers the icarus array is really good.
Should magnetize the Onagers.
Agreed, I am planning on running a minimum of x3 Onagers, x2 with Neutron Lasers and the additional Cognis Stubber and x1 with the Iccarus array, maybe x2 in a squadron. Also plan on giving them all the Cognis Manipulator to give them a 4+ Invulnerable save when run in a triangle formation that ive seen utilized to great effectiveness.
|
19th Krieg Siege Army 7500pts.
40k/HH Night Lords 5000pts.
Orks Waaaghmacht Spearhead 2500pts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/16 02:53:03
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Try to maintain a 2:1 ratio of Vanguard to Rangers. Despite what they look like at first glace, Vanguard do almost everything better than Rangers, except for long range work. And honestly, you're not going to be doing long range work with Skitarii.
|
Peregrine - If you like the army buy it, and don't worry about what one random person on the internet thinks.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/16 17:55:21
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Violent Space Marine Dedicated to Khorne
Someplace someplace Darkplace
|
Could one not use plasma guns from space marines or gaurd line on skittari? Could be a better choice then buying whole boxes of units just for the 1 gun
|
Something ...... something .... Dark side.... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/16 18:07:35
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
Aijec wrote:Hey,
I've decided to build Skiitari as a secondary army. Nobody at my club plays them in force and I just want a casual army to bring to the club on off days.
Love the look and shooting quality of Skiitari Rangers and the tanks.
This is what I was thinking about building.
2x Onager Dunecrawler each with Neutron Lasers
1x Onager Dunecrawler each with Icarus Array
3x Vanguard/w 3x Plasma Calivers Each
2x Vanguard /w 3x Arc Rifles Each
[b]1x Ranger Squad /w 3x Arc Rifles Each
Those are the changes I'd give to your units, plus with Vanguard being cheaper you may be able to slap a Relic on one of those units.
From personal experience though I don't use Rangers that often, besides to camp an objective in a back corner, even then they usually just die to a template with ignores cover. Vanguard however are stupid powerful suicide squads that can drown units in wounds thanks to Rad poisoning.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 16:53:50
Subject: Re:Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
I really think the Aquibas is one of the most over looked weapons. I loved them, for your objective campers I'd definitely take 3. I agree with the changes that were suggested.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 20:42:55
Subject: Re:Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Spacewolverine wrote:I really think the Aquibas is one of the most over looked weapons. I loved them, for your objective campers I'd definitely take 3. I agree with the changes that were suggested.
They aren't overlooked at all (model being lovely and all). They're just mathematically bad at one shot. Were they two shots I'd rethink my stance.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/26 05:23:41
Subject: Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
|
They are the only long range option for infantry campers. They are ok in small numbers bevause they are a threat to even the heaviest of Tanks able to one shot a baneblade even if its unlikely.
|
"We have all and none. Death better come to the other bastard first." - SSG Alton, 19th Valerian Light Infantry Regiment
"With iron and fire the beast shall be lain low at the hands of the Hunters whose home is under the Bloodmoon." - Bloodmoon Hunters Chapter
"Bring on the Angels of Blood and Darkness as thy descend from the heavens to smite our enemies. Let the Wolves of war rend and tear our foes to pieces. And we of the Bloodmoon Hunters shall bring the iron and fire as our vehicles crush all that oppose us under our treads." - Tech-Captain of the Bloodmoon Hunters
My 40k Armies:
Bloodmoon Hunters (Iron Hands Successors)
Lunar Venatorii Regiments (Astra Miltarium)
Mjior Prime Expediton (Skitarii/Admech)
Ordo Machinum (Inquisition) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/26 09:05:59
Subject: Re:Basic Skiitari Maniple as a secondary army. Looking for experienced players thoughts!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The TAs are really hit-and-miss in my experience however as mentioned they really are the only choice if you are looking for your Rangers to sit back and hold objectives. At the same time however running naked squads of Rangers with an Omnispex not only makes them a lot cheaper but I have found them to be just as effective sitting back and holding objectives as they have a 30-inch range. I more often than not run them this way as I would rather invest special weapons into my Vanguard squads who will be for sure and range of almost everything my opponent brings to the table, however I will admit I plan on at least modeling enough for each of my Ranger squads to have x3 of them just because they look cool.
|
19th Krieg Siege Army 7500pts.
40k/HH Night Lords 5000pts.
Orks Waaaghmacht Spearhead 2500pts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|