Digclaw wrote:
Grot 6 wrote:.... Its about credibility at the end of the day. That and good will squandered.
I don't see how you can blame Dust Studios when it was Battlefront that embezzled the kickstarter money to fund Team Yanky
I do have to ask what your source on that information would be, because it sounds entirely made up.
From my own personal reading of both sides presentation during the
KS kerfuffle, it sounded much more like
BF failing to do due diligence before their partnership (in it's more charitable to Dust Studios interpretation). This lead to
BF buying up stock before finding out that it couldn't be sold if
FFG still had stock of that SKU available (which in many cases,
FFG still does). I think at this point
BF was a bit annoyed with
DS, as they had been expecting to start selling it and somehow due to "communication problems" they couldn't sell many of the basic components of the armies.
BF feels hard done by this (justification varying on how far along the "
BF Fail" to "
DS concealed" spectrum; either company has a track record where it either or both could be true) and basically don't pay the invoice. Problem being that Dust Studios already sold that payment to a factoring bank, and now both companies are on the hook to said bank. In what amounts to "a baby will save our troubled marriage" kind of thinking they draw up a contract between the two parties
before the KS was launched that prioritizes payment to said factoring bank out of the campaign.
During the campaign, the companies agreed on a number of freebies that would be offered to the backers to drive up the total. A new misunderstanding emerges.
BF talks to Paolo, who agrees that Dust will provide set of freebies X while
BF will provide set of freebies Y and each company will absorb their costs. After the campaign is concluded and lurched through the first part (held up in no small part by
BF's somewhat characteristic ineptness with technology) and Dust Studios goes "we're not paying for those freebies, you owe us the money for them to be made."
BF cites Paolo agreeing, and the reply from Mr. Yau is essentially "I run Dust Studios, not Paolo; he had no authority to approve such a thing."
At this point,
BF decide they have had enough of being jerked around by their "partner" and draw their line in the sand. They will not pay for the freebies, because in their view they have had all they can stand. Dust holds firm, campaigning for the backers to pressure
BF into just paying for the freebies and stating that all they need is the money and the shipment will be on its way. Months of this go on.
BF gives up on negotiation and simply offers to refund the backers a pro-rated amount. Within 48 hours, suddenly all the problems with Dust have been resolved and things will be proceeding. Almost as though Dust Studios realized that once that pot of money had left
BF and gone back to the backers, they would not see hardly any of it coming back to them. Fast forward many months and Dust Studios is still manufacturing models for the order (makes one wonder how that shipment would have gone out if
BF had outright caved).
Now, there's a fair bit of speculation from the obviously biased information presented by both sides involved in an acrimonious split.
BF has certainly shown itself multiple times to be hilariously bad at dealing with outside contractors. Dust has similarly demonstrated that their most prominent spokesman has a somewhat arms-length relationship with the truth and reality.
I'm not sure I'd trust either with money sight-unseen, but I also find it hard to believe the issues with Dust can be blamed squarely on one side or the other.