Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Does this legacy provide a Chaos Knight of Khorne with the bonus to invulnerable?

If you believe that a Chaos Knight of Khorne's "counts as a Daemon aligned with Khorne" rule means they have the Daemon of Khorne rule then yes it would.

IMO I do not think that is has the Daemon of Khorne rule so no it wouldn't work as far as i'm concerned. But ITC has ruled it has giving Daemon of X so yes it would work in ITC.

 LValx wrote:
Does this legacy provide a Chaos Knight of Khorne with the bonus to invulnerable?

Yes.

Yes, but I'm not sure if the knight can take it himself:
"Vehicles with Daemonic Possession or that are Daemon Engines cannot take the Legacies" - yes, technically he hasn't got the Daemonic Possession upgrade, but I'd suggest that since he's gained Daemon - and you're essentially arguing* Daemon Of Khorne to boot - it's kind of ignoring the intent to say he's not a Daemon Engine.

So I'd suggest - Yes, it will boost the Chaos Knight's invulnerable save, and (since the rule doesn't reference the 'daemon' rule) will actually boost both his native 5+ save to a 4+ and the ion shield 4+ to a 3+, but I would say you'll need another vehicle to actually 'caddy' the upgrade.


* With the backing of a lot of people, including unofficial Forgeworld emails - I'm not contesting the interpretation

You dont need the caddy as legacies can be taken by vehicles that dont have daemonic possession i believe. Being a daemon by RAW is probably different.