Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:09:36
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
@Pouncey: a neat quip, but not a counterpoint.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/21 12:10:13
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:11:22
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
I believe it is a good counterpoint.
Do you see those models as being men with female heads?
If not, then the body is sufficiently androgynous enough to stand in for a Cadian of either gender without being altered.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:11:32
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
Ok, Looks like it's just called Victoria Miniatures.
http://victoriaminiatures.highwire.com/
I have had them book marked for a few years but got rid of all my Mordian Iron Guard ...maybe two years ago.
They have some really nice models that near enough match the Iron Guard line.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:17:45
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
warhead01 wrote:Ok, Looks like it's just called Victoria Miniatures.
http://victoriaminiatures.highwire.com/
I have had them book marked for a few years but got rid of all my Mordian Iron Guard ...maybe two years ago.
They have some really nice models that near enough match the Iron Guard line.
I've seen those in person at AdeptiCon. Very nice minis, but a little pricey.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:19:07
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
TBH yes, or rather, sort of - there is something similar to the "uncanny valley" effect going on with them to my eyes, probably because I am so familiar with the pseudo-human proportions of the ubiquitous Cadian sculpt. When I look at them, can tell that I'm being tricked, as it were. Put it another way, the first and foremost thing I think when looking at those conversions is, hey that's probably about the best anyone could achieve as far as a stop gap conversion goes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:20:34
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
So do I.
You know what I don't see though?
Men with female heads.
I'm not sure if your trying to argue something with me or if what I said confused you.
What ever we both see I don't like them and wouldn't own them.
If you like them and would own them than that's fine.
Your comment comes off as a little snappy and rude.
So I'm not really sure what your really saying.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 12:23:28
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Like I said, it was a quip rather than a counterpoint. To Pouncey, those conversions are apparently 100% convincing. To you and I, they are not.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 13:39:11
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
warhead01 wrote:So do I.
You know what I don't see though?
Men with female heads.
I'm not sure if your trying to argue something with me or if what I said confused you.
What ever we both see I don't like them and wouldn't own them.
If you like them and would own them than that's fine.
Your comment comes off as a little snappy and rude.
So I'm not really sure what your really saying.
You said you see Cadians with female heads.
Cadians are not male by default.
Your statement was akin to saying you don't see a female American soldier, but instead an American soldier with a female head.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Manchu wrote:TBH yes, or rather, sort of - there is something similar to the "uncanny valley" effect going on with them to my eyes, probably because I am so familiar with the pseudo-human proportions of the ubiquitous Cadian sculpt. When I look at them, can tell that I'm being tricked, as it were. Put it another way, the first and foremost thing I think when looking at those conversions is, hey that's probably about the best anyone could achieve as far as a stop gap conversion goes.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then, since I don't think either of us can actually see them using the other person's brain.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/08/21 13:42:36
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 13:56:10
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
Something I've been thinking of lately - if one wanted to incorporate some female minis into the Space Marine lines without contradicting the ridiculous fluff about only men can be Space Marines, you could have units comprised of chapter auxiliaries.
The lore for the Space Marine fleets in Battlefleet Gothic states that auxiliaries are better equipped and trained than Imperial Navy crews, which is part of the reason why SM ships have bonuses to boarding actions. So, there's some official background material supporting the idea.
The justification could be that SM chapters are equipping their serfs to help defend their fortress monasteries and home worlds, and from that they begin to employ them in other battles in roles that don't necessarily require full Space Marines. Vehicle crewmen leap to mind, as does long range supporting fire. I'm picturing basically a stormtrooper's statline, with basic equipment being carapace armor and bolter, maybe with some getting power armor.
The Space Wolves in particular I could picture getting a unit of Shield Maidens. What, the boys all grow up fierce and aggressive, but the women are timid little baby-makers?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 14:10:45
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Grand.Master.Raziel wrote:Something I've been thinking of lately - if one wanted to incorporate some female minis into the Space Marine lines without contradicting the ridiculous fluff about only men can be Space Marines, you could have units comprised of chapter auxiliaries.
The lore for the Space Marine fleets in Battlefleet Gothic states that auxiliaries are better equipped and trained than Imperial Navy crews, which is part of the reason why SM ships have bonuses to boarding actions. So, there's some official background material supporting the idea.
The justification could be that SM chapters are equipping their serfs to help defend their fortress monasteries and home worlds, and from that they begin to employ them in other battles in roles that don't necessarily require full Space Marines. Vehicle crewmen leap to mind, as does long range supporting fire. I'm picturing basically a stormtrooper's statline, with basic equipment being carapace armor and bolter, maybe with some getting power armor.
The Space Wolves in particular I could picture getting a unit of Shield Maidens. What, the boys all grow up fierce and aggressive, but the women are timid little baby-makers?
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/21 14:11:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 14:17:06
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Pouncey wrote: Grand.Master.Raziel wrote:Something I've been thinking of lately - if one wanted to incorporate some female minis into the Space Marine lines without contradicting the ridiculous fluff about only men can be Space Marines, you could have units comprised of chapter auxiliaries.
The lore for the Space Marine fleets in Battlefleet Gothic states that auxiliaries are better equipped and trained than Imperial Navy crews, which is part of the reason why SM ships have bonuses to boarding actions. So, there's some official background material supporting the idea.
The justification could be that SM chapters are equipping their serfs to help defend their fortress monasteries and home worlds, and from that they begin to employ them in other battles in roles that don't necessarily require full Space Marines. Vehicle crewmen leap to mind, as does long range supporting fire. I'm picturing basically a stormtrooper's statline, with basic equipment being carapace armor and bolter, maybe with some getting power armor.
The Space Wolves in particular I could picture getting a unit of Shield Maidens. What, the boys all grow up fierce and aggressive, but the women are timid little baby-makers?
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
I think such a mob of auxiliaries would suit SoB far more than it would SM. If such a unit were to exist, it shouldn't be a compulsory Troops choice, and SoB should have it first.
|
They/them
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 14:29:44
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Sgt_Smudge wrote: Pouncey wrote: Grand.Master.Raziel wrote:Something I've been thinking of lately - if one wanted to incorporate some female minis into the Space Marine lines without contradicting the ridiculous fluff about only men can be Space Marines, you could have units comprised of chapter auxiliaries.
The lore for the Space Marine fleets in Battlefleet Gothic states that auxiliaries are better equipped and trained than Imperial Navy crews, which is part of the reason why SM ships have bonuses to boarding actions. So, there's some official background material supporting the idea.
The justification could be that SM chapters are equipping their serfs to help defend their fortress monasteries and home worlds, and from that they begin to employ them in other battles in roles that don't necessarily require full Space Marines. Vehicle crewmen leap to mind, as does long range supporting fire. I'm picturing basically a stormtrooper's statline, with basic equipment being carapace armor and bolter, maybe with some getting power armor.
The Space Wolves in particular I could picture getting a unit of Shield Maidens. What, the boys all grow up fierce and aggressive, but the women are timid little baby-makers?
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
I think such a mob of auxiliaries would suit SoB far more than it would SM. If such a unit were to exist, it shouldn't be a compulsory Troops choice, and SoB should have it first.
To be clear, I was describing a how the Sisters of Battle have a unit in the lore, and formerly in the tabletop game, which includes men without affecting the Sororitas being female-only. I wasn't suggesting that that particular unit should be given to Space Marines.
I'm sorry for the confusion. : (
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 14:44:11
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Pouncey wrote: Sgt_Smudge wrote: Pouncey wrote: Grand.Master.Raziel wrote:Something I've been thinking of lately - if one wanted to incorporate some female minis into the Space Marine lines without contradicting the ridiculous fluff about only men can be Space Marines, you could have units comprised of chapter auxiliaries.
The lore for the Space Marine fleets in Battlefleet Gothic states that auxiliaries are better equipped and trained than Imperial Navy crews, which is part of the reason why SM ships have bonuses to boarding actions. So, there's some official background material supporting the idea.
The justification could be that SM chapters are equipping their serfs to help defend their fortress monasteries and home worlds, and from that they begin to employ them in other battles in roles that don't necessarily require full Space Marines. Vehicle crewmen leap to mind, as does long range supporting fire. I'm picturing basically a stormtrooper's statline, with basic equipment being carapace armor and bolter, maybe with some getting power armor.
The Space Wolves in particular I could picture getting a unit of Shield Maidens. What, the boys all grow up fierce and aggressive, but the women are timid little baby-makers?
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
I think such a mob of auxiliaries would suit SoB far more than it would SM. If such a unit were to exist, it shouldn't be a compulsory Troops choice, and SoB should have it first.
To be clear, I was describing a how the Sisters of Battle have a unit in the lore, and formerly in the tabletop game, which includes men without affecting the Sororitas being female-only. I wasn't suggesting that that particular unit should be given to Space Marines.
I'm sorry for the confusion. : (
Ah, no worries.
|
They/them
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 15:05:39
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
You said you see Cadians with female heads.
Cadians are not male by default.
Your statement was akin to saying you don't see a female American soldier, but instead an American soldier with a female head.
I think your missed the point of what I was saying. Cadians is a selection of Models made by Games Workshop. They're still to tall and too large collectively.
Might as well not have the female heads at all.
I will say that's almost a close fit to the appearance of female soldiers in full battle rattle. Still not a fan of those models.
Your last bit was kinda funny, I did spend 10 years in the US Army I would either refer to soldiers as Soldiers, Service member, by rank, some times as Hey you or by derogatory terms of endearment not forum appropriate.
I know I was referred to in the same way as well.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 15:15:04
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
warhead01 wrote:You said you see Cadians with female heads.
Cadians are not male by default.
Your statement was akin to saying you don't see a female American soldier, but instead an American soldier with a female head.
I think your missed the point of what I was saying. Cadians is a selection of Models made by Games Workshop. They're still to tall and too large collectively.
Might as well not have the female heads at all.
I will say that's almost a close fit to the appearance of female soldiers in full battle rattle. Still not a fan of those models.
Your last bit was kinda funny, I did spend 10 years in the US Army I would either refer to soldiers as Soldiers, Service member, by rank, some times as Hey you or by derogatory terms of endearment not forum appropriate.
I know I was referred to in the same way as well.
I chose the term "American soldier" specifically because of your country icon. Had you been posting from Canada I'd've said "Canadian soldier."
Also, I have a bit of an annoying habit of responding to exactly what was said. For example, if you tell me I can sign something, "Anywhere," and don't specify an exception, you had damned well better actually mean ANYWHERE, because I am going to take that word literally and sign on the line you don't want me to sign on because it's easier to sign my name on a straight line than in open space on the paper. It's a trait I get honestly from my dad.
So when you tell me that they look like Cadians with female heads, I am likely to take it to mean that they look like Cadians with female heads, and since female Cadians are what we're going for, and the term Cadian refers to citizenship of a planet and does not imply gender, I will thus consider the objective of female Cadians to have been met.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/21 15:16:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 15:35:38
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
Pouncey wrote:
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
I'm hesitant to use the word "mob", but essentially yes. Again, based on the BFG lore, I'm picturing SM serf auxiliaria being at least as well trained as Imperial Guardsmen, and probably as well as Vets. So, I'm not talking the SM equivalent of Cultists here, but rather units of human servants who have been indoctrinated into the chapter's belief structure and have the skills and discipline one would expect.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 15:36:22
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
I chose the term "American soldier" specifically because of your country icon. Had you been posting from Canada I'd've said "Canadian soldier."
I had guessed that. It seemed reasonable.
Also, I have a bit of an annoying habit of responding to exactly what was said. For example, if you tell me I can sign something, "Anywhere," and don't specify an exception, you had damned well better actually mean ANYWHERE, because I am going to take that word literally and sign on the line you don't want me to sign on because it's easier to sign my name on a straight line than in open space on the paper. It's a trait I get honestly from my dad.
Mines much the same, He finds it funny, some times it is.
Dads. You can't live with out them... chemically. lol.
So when you tell me that they look like Cadians with female heads, I am likely to take it to mean that they look like Cadians with female heads, and since female Cadians are what we're going for, and the term Cadian refers to citizenship of a planet and does not imply gender, and thus consider the objective to have been met.
Which is fine, we're beating a dead horse now.
Aside from my dislike of Cadian miniatures, if they had helmets they'd be much better models in my opinion. Despite my other gripes about them. The more pointed chin would, I think create the illusion.
I'm sure some one is building and painting them right now with aspirations of table top domination. And more power to them for their dedication to the hobby.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:04:26
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Christ i go on vacation, come back and this gak is still going on?! What are we even arguing about still?
|
To many unpainted models to count. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:27:43
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Grand.Master.Raziel wrote: Pouncey wrote:
Similar to how a Sisters of Battle army could (and used to) have a cheap Troops choice representing a mob of riled-up civilians led by a Preacher that includes a lot of men, without compromising the lore that Sisters of Battle are only female?
Yes, I could see that working very, very well.
I'm hesitant to use the word "mob", but essentially yes. Again, based on the BFG lore, I'm picturing SM serf auxiliaria being at least as well trained as Imperial Guardsmen, and probably as well as Vets. So, I'm not talking the SM equivalent of Cultists here, but rather units of human servants who have been indoctrinated into the chapter's belief structure and have the skills and discipline one would expect.
Obviously the Space Marine auxiliaries wouldn't use the same lore in any way. Again, it was only a demonstration that it's possible to have male units in a Sisters of Battle codex without breaking the lore, and thus it should be possible for the Space Marines to have female units without breaking the lore.
But, as a side note, the term "mob" does apply accurately to the unit I described. It wouldn't apply to Space Marine auxiliaries though.
Which is fine, we're beating a dead horse now.
Aside from my dislike of Cadian miniatures, if they had helmets they'd be much better models in my opinion. Despite my other gripes about them. The more pointed chin would, I think create the illusion.
I'm sure some one is building and painting them right now with aspirations of table top domination. And more power to them for their dedication to the hobby.
Theoretically the female IG miniatures don't even have to be Cadians, we could pick one of the female-only Regiments mentioned in the official lore and make models for them
But yes, helmets would make more sense for the IG to wear.
Christ i go on vacation, come back and this gak is still going on?! What are we even arguing about still?
At the moment? Essentially whether a headswap would be sufficient for female IG or whether a good portrayal would require entirely different models from the male ones.
Personally, I'd be happy with either one as it applies to Cadians.
Catachans getting female models absolutely would require largely different models. Headswaps would not be sufficient for them at all.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:32:16
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Stealthy Grot Snipa
|
This has been an.... interesting thread to skim through. Okay I lied, I saw mass-arguments on page 1 so I skipped to page 18 and it was still the same argument. Enough Said.
My only random comments on that:
In the end, I'd rather they give love to non-convertible things like a new/trashed Xeno race. Like.... hairy General Grievous as an entire race.
Hell, I want the Space Marine / Adeptus Astartes Codex to give back the Doctrines special rules to the Imperial Guard / Astra Militarum! That was the way to play IG, Close Order Drills and Sharpshooters to represent a Napoleonic Wars regiment. (But accurate). I want clans of Orkz again, I want Ulthwe special rules! Space Marines are just about the only ones to get the amazing-treatment? Pls
I'd like to see diversity in the existing codexes (For the different variants of the factions) more so than models. I can convert models, but I cannot convert rules without getting kicked out of official events!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:35:56
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Honestly, head swaps would be really all you could do/need but even still you would not notice unless you pointed it out is the problem.
In combat armor, well it would not matter because thats standard issue so boobs would be hidden.
The only diffrence would be heads which, not sure what they could actually do model wise, headless with longer hair? Pony tails? A sharper jaw line to distinguish its a female?
I would not be apposed to female head bits being in the kits, but really i think guard are the only ones that could need it and even then, it would be so hard to tell the difference.
So not against it, but not really worth it IMO if it means a price hike and a new mold which is not a cheap thing to do for GW just to make a small group happy. so from a business standpoint on it, i would be against it, from a modeling aspect sure why not.
|
To many unpainted models to count. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:41:43
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Da Kommizzar wrote:This has been an.... interesting thread to skim through. Okay I lied, I saw mass-arguments on page 1 so I skipped to page 18 and it was still the same argument. Enough Said.
Please, consider yourself lucky for skipping those pages, and do not make any attempt to go back and read them.
Up to around page 13-14 or so the thread devolved into discussions so inappropriate and offensive that a moderator had to step in with a threat of banning. A description of the subject of those discussions will not improve your life or knowledge in any way, so don't ask what it was about.
My only random comments on that:
In the end, I'd rather they give love to non-convertible things like a new/trashed Xeno race. Like.... hairy General Grievous as an entire race.
Hell, I want the Space Marine / Adeptus Astartes Codex to give back the Doctrines special rules to the Imperial Guard / Astra Militarum! That was the way to play IG, Close Order Drills and Sharpshooters to represent a Napoleonic Wars regiment. (But accurate). I want clans of Orkz again, I want Ulthwe special rules! Space Marines are just about the only ones to get the amazing-treatment? Pls
I'd like to see diversity in the existing codexes (For the different variants of the factions) more so than models. I can convert models, but I cannot convert rules without getting kicked out of official events!
Yeah, more gameplay choices would be nice too. : D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:43:43
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
Warwick, Warwickshire, England, UK, NW Europe, Sol-3, Western Spiral Arm, Milky Way
|
Adding in new heads and torsos isn't that big a deal for GW. Consider the retoolings of the Space Marine sprue since it's 3rd Edition incarnation! new rocket launcher parts, new heads, new weapons (grav, combi-bolters), new armour parts, new purity seals... contrast the Cadian sprue. It hasn't been looked at once since it was released just after the Eye of Terror Campaign in 2000 or so.Oh no, that's not true, they reduced the number of figures in a box from 20 to 10.
Whacking in some female torsos and heads (perhaps with sidecaps or forage caps scattered amongst the helmets) is hardly that major.
As for Chapter Serfs, I was always under the impression that they were failed aspirants, so, again, all male.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:45:34
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Backspacehacker wrote:Honestly, head swaps would be really all you could do/need but even still you would not notice unless you pointed it out is the problem.
In combat armor, well it would not matter because thats standard issue so boobs would be hidden.
The only diffrence would be heads which, not sure what they could actually do model wise, headless with longer hair? Pony tails? A sharper jaw line to distinguish its a female?
I would not be apposed to female head bits being in the kits, but really i think guard are the only ones that could need it and even then, it would be so hard to tell the difference.
So not against it, but not really worth it IMO if it means a price hike and a new mold which is not a cheap thing to do for GW just to make a small group happy. so from a business standpoint on it, i would be against it, from a modeling aspect sure why not.
I agree for the case of Cadians, but given how much bare skin the Catachan models have they would require almost entirely new models to have female minis.
However, if a simple headswap would do it for Cadians, it could be a conversion kit offering the female head options until GW was going to make a new Cadian kit anyways, and then they could put female heads onto the new sprues since it wouldn't cost much extra to do so.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:49:05
Subject: Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Catachans i could see looking very different, the only problem is, they dont sell for gak
So unfortunately it would be a waste of money on GWs part.
|
To many unpainted models to count. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:53:20
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
Warwick, Warwickshire, England, UK, NW Europe, Sol-3, Western Spiral Arm, Milky Way
|
I mean, in all honesty, Forgeworld could knock out a Cadian/Catachan conversion kit with a month's work or so, probably? New torsos, heads and arms, to fit on the Cadians, and a similar set in singlets and waistcoat-style flak vests for the Catachans. Given that they already did similar sets for Cadian Veterans with Shotguns, why shouldn't we look to Forgeworld to provide the answer to this?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 16:58:31
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Gen.Steiner wrote:I mean, in all honesty, Forgeworld could knock out a Cadian/Catachan conversion kit with a month's work or so, probably? New torsos, heads and arms, to fit on the Cadians, and a similar set in singlets and waistcoat-style flak vests for the Catachans. Given that they already did similar sets for Cadian Veterans with Shotguns, why shouldn't we look to Forgeworld to provide the answer to this?
Personally, I do prefer plastic models to resin ones, so I would prefer GW to do it, but you raise a very valid point since most 40k gamers don't have the same aversion to resin models that I do.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 17:03:29
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
Warwick, Warwickshire, England, UK, NW Europe, Sol-3, Western Spiral Arm, Milky Way
|
Pouncey wrote:Personally, I do prefer plastic models to resin ones, so I would prefer GW to do it, but you raise a very valid point since most 40k gamers don't have the same aversion to resin models that I do.
Yeah, I mean, I'd rather they were in the standard plastic box sets too, but if we're ever to see them I think that Forgeworld are the most likely to produce them. I don't know why they haven't already to be honest. I'll send them an e-mail.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 17:12:51
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Gen.Steiner wrote: Pouncey wrote:Personally, I do prefer plastic models to resin ones, so I would prefer GW to do it, but you raise a very valid point since most 40k gamers don't have the same aversion to resin models that I do.
Yeah, I mean, I'd rather they were in the standard plastic box sets too, but if we're ever to see them I think that Forgeworld are the most likely to produce them. I don't know why they haven't already to be honest. I'll send them an e-mail.
Good plan. If it's relevant, tell them you're not just asking for yourself since I'd like to see it happen too. I'd probably even get over my dislike of resin models enough to get some of my own.
Yeah, I know earlier I said I wouldn't use resin for an entire army under any circumstances. That's just the kind of thing you get people to say when you start arguing with them about why they don't like the things they don't like.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/21 17:13:33
Subject: Re:Adding more diversity to the 40K universe.
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
Warwick, Warwickshire, England, UK, NW Europe, Sol-3, Western Spiral Arm, Milky Way
|
This is the e-mail I sent:
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is REDACTED. I have been a Games Workshop fan for over 20 years, and throughout that time have been an avid Imperial Guard player. For some time now I have been wondering why no attempt ever appears to have been made to produce a conversion kit for Cadian or Catachan plastics to allow players to field female Imperial Guard troopers? With the honourable exceptions of the metal Catachan Grenade Launcher, Rocket Girl, Warrior Woman, a Tanith trooper, a rather cheese-cakey Commissar from the early 1990s and a Rogue Trader Imperial Army trooper or two, the Imperial Army, now Imperial Guard, has been dominated by male figures.
This is fine as far as it goes, but I and many others would appreciate the ability to field Guard armies with both male and female troopers in, both in reflection of the official background (see the Ciaphas Cain and Gaunt's Ghosts series, not to mention units like the Dneipr Regiments in the 3rd Edition Guard Codex), and in reflection of a historical and current reality that has seen many women serve with distinction in military forces from the Scythians through the Dahomey to the Red Army and on into the modern British Armed Forces (among others).
I have in the past asked Forgeworld this question, but never received an answer of any sort. It seems to me that a 'test set' of, say, ten female heads and torsos, along the lines of the Cadian Veterans with Shotguns or Cadians in Respirators, would be of interest to a great many Imperial Guard - and Chaos Renegade - players.
I look forwards to your response.
Yours faithfully,
REDACTED
I will let you all know if and when I get a reply...!
|
|
|
 |
 |
|