Justice Department says it will end use of private prisons
By Matt Zapotosky August 18 at 1:06 PM

The Justice Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates announced the decision on Thursday in a memo that instructs officials to either decline to renew the contracts for private prison operators when they expire or “substantially reduce” the contracts’ scope. The goal, Yates wrote, is “reducing — and ultimately ending — our use of privately operated prisons.”

“They simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and as noted in a recent report by the Department’s Office of Inspector General, they do not maintain the same level of safety and security,” Yates wrote.

In an interview, Yates said there are 13 privately run privately run facilities in the Bureau of Prisons system, and they will not close overnight. Yates said the Justice Department would not terminate existing contracts but instead review those that come up for renewal. She said all the contracts would come up for renewal over the next five years.

The Justice Department’s inspector general last week released a critical report concluding that privately operated facilities incurred more safety and security incidents than those run by the federal Bureau of Prisons. The private facilities, for example, had higher rates of assaults — both by inmates on other inmates and by inmates on staff — and had eight times as many contraband cellphones confiscated each year on average, according to the report.

Disturbances in the facilities, the report said, led in recent years to “extensive property damage, bodily injury, and the death of a Correctional Officer.” The report listed several examples of mayhem at private facilities, including a May 2012 riot at the Adams County Correctional Center in Mississippi in which 20 people were injured and a correctional officer killed. That incident, according to the report, involved 250 inmates who were upset about low-quality food and medical care.

“The fact of the matter is that private prisons don’t compare favorably to Bureau of Prisons facilities in terms of safety or security or services, and now with the decline in the federal prison population, we have both the opportunity and the responsibility to do something about that,” Yates said.

The problems at private facilities were hardly a secret, and Yates said Justice Department and Bureau of Prisons officials had been talking for months about discontinuing their use. Mother Jones recently published a 35,000-word exposé detailing a reporter’s undercover work as a private prison guard in Louisiana — a piece that found serious deficiencies. The Nation magazine wrote earlier this year about deaths under questionable circumstances in privately operated facilities.

It is possible the directive could face resistance from those companies that will be affected. In response to the inspector general’s report, the contractors running the prisons noted that their inmate populations consist largely of noncitizens, presenting them with challenges that government-run facilities do not have.

Scott Marquardt, president of Management and Training Corporation, wrote that comparing Bureau of Prisons facilities to privately operated ones was “comparing apples and oranges.” He generally disputed the inspector general’s report.

“Any casual reader would come to the conclusion that contract prisons are not as safe as BOP prisons,” Marquardt wrote. “The conclusion is wrong and is not supported by the work done by the [Office of the Inspector General].”

Yates, though, noted that the Bureau of Prisons was “already taking steps” to make her order a reality. Three weeks ago, she wrote, the bureau declined to renew a contract for 1,200 beds at the Cibola County Correctional Center in New Mexico. According to a local TV station, the county sheriff said the facility’s closure would have a negative impact on the community.

Yates wrote that the bureau also would amend a solicitation for a 10,800-bed contract to one for a maximum 3,600-bed contract. That, Yates wrote, would allow the Bureau of Prisons over the next year to discontinue housing inmates in at least three private prisons, and by May 1, 2017, the total private prison population would stand at less than 14,200 inmates. She said it was “hard to know precisely” when all the privately run facilities would no longer have federal inmates, though she noted that 14,200 was less than half the inmates they held at their apex three years ago, a figure she said indicated the department was “well on our way to ultimately eliminating the use of private prisons entirely.”

“We have to be realistic about the time it will take, but that really depends on the continuing decline of the federal prison population, and that’s really hard to accurately predict,” Yates said.

According to the inspector general’s report, private prisons housed roughly 22,660 federal inmates as of December 2015. That represents about 12 percent of the Bureau of Prisons total inmate population, according to the report.

In her memo, Yates wrote that the Bureau of Prisons began contracting with privately run institutions about a decade ago in the wake of exploding prison populations, and by 2013, as the federal prison population reached its peak, nearly 30,000 inmates were housed in privately operated facilities. But in 2013, Yates wrote, the prison population began to decline because of efforts to adjust sentencing guidelines, sometimes retroactively, and to change the way low-level drug offenders are charged. She said the drop in federal inmates gave officials the opportunity to reevaluate the use of private prisons.

Yates wrote that private prisons “served an important role during a difficult time period,” but they had proven less effective than facilities run by the government. The contract prisons are operated by three private corporations, according to the inspector general’s report: Corrections Corporation of America, GEO Group and Management and Training Corporation. The Bureau of Prisons spent $639 million on private prisons in fiscal year 2014, according to the report.

Yates said it was “really hard to determine whether private prisons are less expensive” and whether their closure would cause costs to go up, though she said officials did not anticipate having to hire additional Bureau of Prisons staff.

“Bottom line, I’d also say, you get what you pay for,” Yates said.

 Ouze wrote:
Well, this season was pretty good.

 Frazzled wrote:

 Ouze wrote:
Well, this season was pretty good.

I liked it (except for the guards) up until the last couple of episodes. Both the daughter and I quit watching before the last episode and won't be watching any more.

Well. US gov should be running own jails.

They convict you. They should jail you.

 Ouze wrote:


This only affects federal prisons, but it's still a great direction.

Thanks, Obama.

 jhe90 wrote:
Well. US gov should be running own jails.

They convict you. They should jail you.

 Tannhauser42 wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:
Well. US gov should be running own jails.

They convict you. They should jail you.

Until the prison companies sue for loss of business or something and win. Sounds like what I heard about Texas prisons used to be built using inmate labor back in the day until the construction companies sued the state and won.

 Frazzled wrote:

 Ouze wrote:
Well, this season was pretty good.

I liked it (except for the guards) up until the last couple of episodes. Both the daughter and I quit watching before the last episode and won't be watching any more.

 whembly wrote:

 Tannhauser42 wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:
Well. US gov should be running own jails.

They convict you. They should jail you.

Until the prison companies sue for loss of business or something and win. Sounds like what I heard about Texas prisons used to be built using inmate labor back in the day until the construction companies sued the state and won.

Prison companies can suck it.

I'm all for States/Federal owned prisons... that puts pressure on the system to ensure only those needing to be imprisoned, goes to prison.

 Frazzled wrote:
Someone must have watched Orange is the New Black and realized its about a federal for profit prison.

Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

 nels1031 wrote:

Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

I'd hope so, federal prisons have a nigh unlimited budget. The better part of 10 billion dollars, which is double what it was about 10 years ago.

 d-usa wrote:

 nels1031 wrote:

Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

I'd hope so, federal prisons have a nigh unlimited budget. The better part of 10 billion dollars, which is double what it was about 10 years ago.

BOP Budget

2006: $5 Billion ($5.5 Billion if adjusted for inflation)
2016: $6.9 Billion

Some of which was spend on private prisons, of course.

 d-usa wrote:

 nels1031 wrote:

Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

I'd hope so, federal prisons have a nigh unlimited budget. The better part of 10 billion dollars, which is double what it was about 10 years ago.

BOP Budget

2006: $5 Billion ($5.5 Billion if adjusted for inflation)
2016: $6.9 Billion

Some of which was spend on private prisons, of course.

 whembly wrote:
Thanks!

I think...



I'm not sure I have a problem with the cost... it's an eye opener for sure.

However, I'm of the opinion prison systems need to be operated by the State/Federal institution... regardless of the cost.

If it ever became too costly... well then, maybe release the non-violent offenders first.

 Tannhauser42 wrote:
Until the prison companies sue for loss of business or something and win. Sounds like what I heard about Texas prisons used to be built using inmate labor back in the day until the construction companies sued the state and won.

 Frazzled wrote:
I liked it (except for the guards) up until the last couple of episodes. Both the daughter and I quit watching before the last episode and won't be watching any more.

 sebster wrote:

 Tannhauser42 wrote:
Until the prison companies sue for loss of business or something and win. Sounds like what I heard about Texas prisons used to be built using inmate labor back in the day until the construction companies sued the state and won.

You can't sue for loss of business because government doesn't want to use your service anymore. You'll note that government isn't cancelling existing contracts, they're just waiting for the contracts to expire..

 d-usa wrote:
Slightly related: ramen is more popular than tobacco as prison currecy now, partly due to food quality going down.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/22/ramen-prison-currency-study

 Tannhauser42 wrote:

 sebster wrote:

 Tannhauser42 wrote:
Until the prison companies sue for loss of business or something and win. Sounds like what I heard about Texas prisons used to be built using inmate labor back in the day until the construction companies sued the state and won.

You can't sue for loss of business because government doesn't want to use your service anymore. You'll note that government isn't cancelling existing contracts, they're just waiting for the contracts to expire..

Like I said, "or something". Those prison companies will find some way to sue or otherwise take action to try to prevent it. That's the American Way, after all.