Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/03 21:55:37
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Davor wrote:ChazSexington wrote:Retcon.
At least that's what happened last time.
Yeah sadly no matter what GW does, while I will enjoy the ride they are doing, I have this nagging feeling this is all for not and it will be just like Dallas and "it was all a dream" and means nothing.
You're old.  [We're old I guess]
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/03 21:56:36
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/03 21:56:16
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!
|
BrianDavion wrote: Robin5t wrote:On the livestream today, they confirmed that Fall of Cadia is only the start of the story - they also confirmed that the galaxy will still be standing when this is all done.
in other words "don't panic, we're not AoSing 40k"
They did at one point out right say that there won't be a 40k end times. However the reason they gave was because Archaon was lord of the end times, and we don't have a Lord of the end times in 40k, instead of reasuring us that there won't be a 40k end times because they aren't going to skull  the plot again.
|
Ghorros wrote:The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
Marmatag wrote:All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/03 23:22:37
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
A lot of people seem to be missing the point of Cadia. It's the Cadian Gate, as in, the gateway to the Eye. It's the only major stable route in or out of the eye. Warp travel is not like Star Wars hyper space, where you just pop in and out of where you want to be at random. Certain systems have far more stable Warp gate's than others and you have to hop between them to get anywhere.
Hence why in Path of Heaven, Horus was able to block the White Scars from reaching Terra, he simply had fleets in all major warp routes. If the Scars popped into realspace then the alarm was sounded and the Traitor fleets showed up in force. This is how Cadia works except it's literally the only way out of the eye on a large scale. Small Chaos fleets are able to slip in and out hence why not every battle is always in the Cadian Sector. However the huge incursions needed to take Terra, would have to come through the main gate or risk half of their ships being lost to the warp or delayed by centuries.
There is even a Word Bearers novel (Dark Creed I think?) Where there is a world that the Imperium is convinced is unassailable as it's right next to a stable warp gate. Any attempt to attack the system can be countered by a whole segmentum battle fleet showing up within a few hours. However the WB use a Necron device to shut down the gate, which makes it impossible for the Imperium to send reinforcements.
Ships require Navigators, precisely because the warp needs to be navigated. It's not a point A to point B deal. There are stable routes which ships are able to negotiate in a relatively "predictable" time/level of safety. It is possible to travel other routes but these could result in ships getting lost in the warp, destroyed, delayed decades or millenia, Or arriving in totally incorrect locations.
It's not just a case of "Butttt spehhhhhsssss is big, go around duhhh" It's; space is so huge, you have to jump through these very specific warp points to have any hope of getting anywhere quickly.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/04 01:10:51
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
alanmckenzie wrote:So, the latest leaked snippets from January’s White Dwarf reveal a new book titled Gathering Storm: Fall of Cadia.
Now, in terms of the 40k setting, the Fall of Cadia is a pretty huge event. Perhaps the most significant event for a few thousand years?
So what are the implications (assuming the Fall does happen)?
Where is the setting going?
How much ground needs to be covered between Cadia falling and the Imperium collapsing?
What constitutes a collapse of the Imperium? Death of the Emperor and with it the Astronomican?
What does an Astronomican-less Imperium look like? Isolated pocket Empires?
Do you think that the Fall of Cadia is the last event of the 41st millennium and of 7th edition, or is there going to be a Gathering Storm: Siege of Terra before then? Again, how much ground needs to be covered between these two events?
Susequently, how does 8th Edition begin?
Let the conjecture flow.....
If Cadia falls, the Eye of Terror will probably get bigger. The Necron pylons holding things in check were already failing. The Armless Wonder might speed things along by finishing off the pylons.
And things for the Eldrad's hometown will get a lot more interesting. Not to mention, the rest of the Segmentum Obscurus. Automatically Appended Next Post: KorPhaeron77 wrote:
Ships require Navigators, precisely because the warp needs to be navigated. It's not a point A to point B deal. There are stable routes which ships are able to negotiate in a relatively "predictable" time/level of safety. It is possible to travel other routes but these could result in ships getting lost in the warp, destroyed, delayed decades or millenia, Or arriving in totally incorrect locations.
It's not just a case of "Butttt spehhhhhsssss is big, go around duhhh" It's; space is so huge, you have to jump through these very specific warp points to have any hope of getting anywhere quickly.
The only thing Navigators allow for is longer Warp jumps to be made safely. Shorter jumps, known as "calculated jumps", can be done with technological means.
Unfortunately, it's difficult to maintain a galaxy-spanning empire the size of the Imperium by relying on short Warp hops.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/04 01:17:44
Proud Purveyor Of The Unconventional In 40k |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/04 16:37:33
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Well one implication could be a name change. Is that a thing I can do? /s
|
iGuy91 wrote:You love the T-Rex. Its both a hero and a Villain in the first two movies. It is the "king" of dinosaurs. Its the best. You love your T-rex.
Then comes along the frakking Spinosaurus who kills the T-rex, and the movie says "LOVE THIS NOW! HE IS BETTER" But...in your heart, you love the T-rex, who shouldn't have lost to no stupid Spinosaurus. So you hate the movie. And refuse to love the Spinosaurus because it is a hamfisted attempt at taking what you loved, making it TREX +++ and trying to sell you it.
Elbows wrote:You know what's better than a psychic phase? A psychic phase which asks customers to buy more miniatures... 
the_scotsman wrote:Dae think the company behind such names as deathwatch death guard deathskullz death marks death korps deathleaper death jester might be bad at naming? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/04 16:56:05
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Brutal Black Orc
|
mrhappyface wrote:BrianDavion wrote: Robin5t wrote:On the livestream today, they confirmed that Fall of Cadia is only the start of the story - they also confirmed that the galaxy will still be standing when this is all done.
in other words "don't panic, we're not AoSing 40k"
They did at one point out right say that there won't be a 40k end times. However the reason they gave was because Archaon was lord of the end times, and we don't have a Lord of the end times in 40k, instead of reasuring us that there won't be a 40k end times because they aren't going to skull  the plot again.
Wait, are you saying they might bring archaon to 40k at some point? Man, the galaxy is fethed and so is Abaddon.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/04 17:05:13
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!
|
Lord Kragan wrote: mrhappyface wrote:BrianDavion wrote: Robin5t wrote:On the livestream today, they confirmed that Fall of Cadia is only the start of the story - they also confirmed that the galaxy will still be standing when this is all done.
in other words "don't panic, we're not AoSing 40k"
They did at one point out right say that there won't be a 40k end times. However the reason they gave was because Archaon was lord of the end times, and we don't have a Lord of the end times in 40k, instead of reasuring us that there won't be a 40k end times because they aren't going to skull  the plot again.
Wait, are you saying they might bring archaon to 40k at some point? Man, the galaxy is fethed and so is Abaddon.
I don't think Archaon will come to 40k, more likely the end times will be called 'black crusade' because Abaddon is the Lord of the black crusade.
|
Ghorros wrote:The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
Marmatag wrote:All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/05 15:01:25
Subject: Implications of the Fall of Cadia?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Archaon might not have made it to 40k, but Belakor did!
|
|
 |
 |
|