Switch Theme:

Formation and Detachments  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






Hi so I'm having a hard time understanding formations and detachments.
I'm looking at the skitarii Maniple in the codex and I'm wondering is that their force organization chart?
when i make formations at the back of the codex do i have to conform to to the force organization chart?
And in the Space Marine Codex there's a formation with 3-5 librarians so how would someone field that, isn't there only 2 HQ slots?
I am still clearly new to the game and i would appreciate the help!
   
Made in es
Brutal Black Orc




Barcelona, Spain

fraser1191 wrote:
Hi so I'm having a hard time understanding formations and detachments.
I'm looking at the skitarii Maniple in the codex and I'm wondering is that their force organization chart?
when i make formations at the back of the codex do i have to conform to to the force organization chart?
And in the Space Marine Codex there's a formation with 3-5 librarians so how would someone field that, isn't there only 2 HQ slots?
I am still clearly new to the game and i would appreciate the help!


The CAD is a detachment of its own, when you run a formation you run a completely different force-org, restricted to what the formation tells you can/must bring.
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






So the Example force organization chart in the rule book should be ignored and i just use whatever formations i want?
   
Made in es
Brutal Black Orc




Barcelona, Spain

You could do that. Or do mix and match and run both. A CAD with 1-2 HQ and the rest and a formation.
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






okay cause I have a small space marine army and i thought it was kinda lame that if you had 2 battle demi companies that you couldn't have any scouts, because that would use all 6 troop slots in the force organization chart.
But now it makes more sense. thanks
   
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy





Illinois

This might blow your mind but you also have the option of playing Unbound. Which is literally put whatever you want on the table and play a game. You don't get special rules but lets say that you want to run a squadron of predators alongside your Demi Company. You can absolutely do that without having them in a CAD, Formation or any kind of detachment.

“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
 
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






 zeragrin wrote:
This might blow your mind but you also have the option of playing Unbound. Which is literally put whatever you want on the table and play a game. You don't get special rules but lets say that you want to run a squadron of predators alongside your Demi Company. You can absolutely do that without having them in a CAD, Formation or any kind of detachment.


wow i didn't know that you could have a combination of formations and unbound! now that i know I'm not limited to the force organization chart in the rule book ill have to revamp my list lol
   
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy





Illinois

fraser1191 wrote:
 zeragrin wrote:
This might blow your mind but you also have the option of playing Unbound. Which is literally put whatever you want on the table and play a game. You don't get special rules but lets say that you want to run a squadron of predators alongside your Demi Company. You can absolutely do that without having them in a CAD, Formation or any kind of detachment.


wow i didn't know that you could have a combination of formations and unbound! now that i know I'm not limited to the force organization chart in the rule book ill have to revamp my list lol


Unbound is a great way to play when you are new to the hobby or starting a new army. My wife just started playing Necrons. She runs a Reclamation Phalanx (Necrons get started box formation) with a Cryptek and Deathamarks running Unbound alongside.

“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




Problem with playing Unbound is in most cases you will not be able to get any games because a lot of people think it's a bad way of playing.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy





Illinois

Davor wrote:
Problem with playing Unbound is in most cases you will not be able to get any games because a lot of people think it's a bad way of playing.


Yeah I've never understood that mentality. I mean I get not wanting to play against 5 Wraithknights but not letting someone take 1 extra HQ (within the agreed upon points limit) is anti-fun imo.

“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 zeragrin wrote:
Davor wrote:
Problem with playing Unbound is in most cases you will not be able to get any games because a lot of people think it's a bad way of playing.


Yeah I've never understood that mentality. I mean I get not wanting to play against 5 Wraithknights but not letting someone take 1 extra HQ (within the agreed upon points limit) is anti-fun imo.


And there is worse cheese using formations. Now you have a formation with Tau using what 3 Riptides? Talk about almost using a "legal" 5 Wraithknights.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: