| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2017/01/15 16:48:36
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Does this work say vs a Bastion?
|
|
|
 |
|
2017/01/15 17:38:02
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!
|
Liftadropper says "Target a vehicle".
|
Ghorros wrote:The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
 Marmatag wrote:All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/15 18:27:28
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
BRB p110 wrote:When determining if a building can be targeted by a shooting attack {...}, or affected by a special rule, treat the building as a vehicle unless specifically stated otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/15 18:35:01
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Impassive Inquisitorial Interrogator
U.K.
|
SMASHY MC SMASHERSON TIME!!
|
3 SPRUUUUUEESSSS!!!!
JWBS wrote:
I'm not going to re-read the lunacy that is the last few pages of this thread, but I'd be very surprised if anyone actually said that. Even that one guy banging on about how relatively difficult it might be for an Inquisitor to acquire power armour, I don't think even that guy said that.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/15 19:11:03
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Krazed Killa Kan
|
sooooo.....
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Important for 2017 ITC when 2 fortifications become legal.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/15 19:11:50
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/16 03:07:38
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
So you can move buildings around? The long-neglected lifta-droppa may have gotten ever-so-slightly less useless.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/16 03:08:00
40k drinking game: take a shot everytime a book references Skitarii using transports.
 |
|
|
|
|
2017/01/16 03:17:43
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Gnome, are you kidding me? The lifta droppa is one of the best anti-armor guns in the game.
Roll to hit on a vehicle in range and that started with 4 HPs or less.
Miss = Nothing happens
Hit = Don't roll for damage. Roll Scatter + 2d6 and an "Explode" result happens automatically. Pop goes a land-raider or Monolith! Every turn.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/16 03:45:35
Subject: Re:Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The BS is 2 for the Stompa, so on average a vehicle gets Lifta-Droppa'd every 3rd turn.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/16 03:46:11
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Krazed Killa Kan
|
still though.... kaboom.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/17 02:09:04
Subject: Liftadroppa vs Buildings
|
|
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
It's meant for Apoc yet it can't hurt superheavies, it can't hurt anything but vehicles, it uses BS2, and doesn't move things very far. I acknowledge it's strengths but its shortcomings are very problematic.
|
40k drinking game: take a shot everytime a book references Skitarii using transports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
