| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 15:07:06
Subject: Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Edgewood, Washington state
|
Hello, Been asking about wanting to play AoS. Now I wanted to ask if there is a Battletome for Greenskinz? I see one for Ironjawz and Bonesplitterz, but nothing for the original Greenskinz? Any Greenskinz players can help this newb out would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 15:12:31
Subject: Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
There isn't a battletome for them yet. The only destruction tomes out is Ironjawz, Bonesplitterz and beastclaw raiders.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 15:30:09
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Edgewood, Washington state
|
Ok, so would a pre-AoS Greenskinz book still work?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 16:31:34
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Brutal Black Orc
|
Try their warscrolls, of course. If it ain't updated the original works.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 16:52:43
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Edgewood, Washington state
|
Lord Kragan wrote:
Try their warscrolls, of course. If it ain't updated the original works.
Great! I didn't know if some of the old material can still be used if it wasn't updated. Thank you!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 19:08:49
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
What do you mean by book? I am not familiar with Greenskinz so sadly I can't help you there. If they don't have a battletome then you can only use their warscrolls that are perfectly legal. Just like how Tomb Kings and Bretonians (sorry don't know their AoS names keep forgetting) they have no battletome either and just use their warscrolls.
If you get the Destruction Grand Alliance book, you can get some benefits for choosing the alliance at least. I think it's $20 Canadian. That book is mostly warscrolls from what I remember that you get for free on the internet anyways, but you do get a small bit of fluff and some Allegiance abilities. The reason I bought it, is because I can have all the warscrolls in paper form without printing them out. YMMV of course.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 21:35:57
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Edgewood, Washington state
|
Davor wrote:
What do you mean by book? I am not familiar with Greenskinz so sadly I can't help you there. If they don't have a battletome then you can only use their warscrolls that are perfectly legal. Just like how Tomb Kings and Bretonians (sorry don't know their AoS names keep forgetting) they have no battletome either and just use their warscrolls.
If you get the Destruction Grand Alliance book, you can get some benefits for choosing the alliance at least. I think it's $20 Canadian. That book is mostly warscrolls from what I remember that you get for free on the internet anyways, but you do get a small bit of fluff and some Allegiance abilities. The reason I bought it, is because I can have all the warscrolls in paper form without printing them out. YMMV of course. 
I didn't know if I could use a previous Greenskinz book like in 40k they're codexes.
You sent me a link to those Warscrolls in card form. Those I really like! I love the fluff, I think that's why I'm so stuck on looking at official GW stuff.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 22:18:03
Subject: Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
There is no previous book for Greenskinz to my knowledge. If you are thinking using the ones from Fantasy, the answer would be no, you can't use them as they are totally different stats. So basically those cards that are in the Destruction Grand Alliance book is all you can use at the moment sadly. Now is it worth getting? I don't know. Not sure if the Allegiance bonuses are worth it or not.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/02/06 22:19:06
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/06 22:45:28
Subject: Re:Greenskinz Battletome?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Edgewood, Washington state
|
Ok that makes sense. I wasn't sure if old material can still be used in AoS or not.
I'll probably start with greenskinz because I love the classic fantasy look.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|