Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

SemperMortis wrote:

 BaconCatBug wrote:
Or stop being cowardly gitz and get up close and krump em.

Orks have NEVER been an effective shooty army.

Nobody said they were, we want our ranged stuff to be WORTH TAKING. otherwise, why the hell is it in the codex?

To act as a backup while you're getting into smashy range?

 BaconCatBug wrote:

SemperMortis wrote:

 BaconCatBug wrote:
Or stop being cowardly gitz and get up close and krump em.

Orks have NEVER been an effective shooty army.

Nobody said they were, we want our ranged stuff to be WORTH TAKING. otherwise, why the hell is it in the codex?

To act as a backup while you're getting into smashy range?

Backup for what though? whats the point if its better to just take more CC oriented boyz either in trukkz, Wagonz or foot sloggin? They don't do much for damage and the die to a stiff breeze, worse, they can't even try to hide in cover and expect to survive long.