| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 16:12:33
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Mostly I miss digital weapons and conversion fields on my company master.
|
“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 16:15:31
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I miss the Scrolls of Magnus and Dirge Casters.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/07/18 16:16:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 16:20:36
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
I miss the bonded exoskeleton and enhanced senses and extended carapace. I'm used to option loss.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 16:28:08
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
War Walker Pilot with Withering Fire
|
My Skitarii feel your loss. They weep tears of oil and other lubricants.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:06:43
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Not really, it was only ever used to abuse rules.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:08:30
Subject: Re:Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
Inquisition used to be so cool... the Build-A-Bear workshop of Warhammer 40k.
Alas, now they have nothing to work with.
|
You say Fiery Crash! I say Dynamic Entry!
*Increases Game Point Limit by 100*: Tau get two Crisis Suits and a Firewarrior. Imperial Guard get two infantry companies, artillery support, and APCs. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:26:35
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Yes, very much so.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:28:54
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
|
You will get them back, just wait for the codices. The index is a tool, not the whole set.
|
From Iron, cometh Strength. From Strength, cometh Will. From Will, cometh Faith. From Faith, cometh Honour. From Honour, cometh Iron. This is the Unbreakable Litany, and may it forever be so |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:34:57
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta
|
I miss the old ork loot any vehicle rules
|
10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 17:36:18
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
I miss vortex grenades
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 19:46:18
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
On another smaller note, I didn't get into 40k until 3rd so looking at 2nd edition, there are a lot of things that Chaos had which are no longer things.
Why can't Chaos Dreads take any combi-weapon of choice, being stuck with Combi-Bolters? How come Fabulous Bill no longer has varied profiles/different serums for his Xyclos Needler? The codex was so simple yet so comprehensive in making Chaos a truly distinct army, without relying on Dinobots or Princes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:07:01
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
Lisbon, Portugal
|
Of course! Tau vehicles lost all access to systems, while battlesuit systems like positional relay, blacksun filter and vectored retro-thrusters are gone.
BUt at least we know relics and warlord traits will be back in our codexes. These stuff... I think I may never see them again :(
|
AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union
Unit1126PLL wrote:"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"
Shadenuat wrote:Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:12:56
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ditto. Also Monowheels on Ork characters. Hilarious design concept.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:19:44
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Do you have any examples off the top of your head? I'm genuinely curious as that never happened in our group.
|
“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:32:08
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
CthulhuDawg wrote: Do you have any examples off the top of your head? I'm genuinely curious as that never happened in our group.
The classic example is Nob Warbikers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:34:21
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
How are people still not understanding that this is an Index problem?
The Index is not the final form of your army with all its small parts represented. It is a stop gap, and removing these things is completely expected.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:34:54
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
I want my Veil of Darkness, Solar Pulse and Nightmare Shroud back. Those were around since 3rd ed, and now they are gone.
Give me back my shenanigans GW. Automatically Appended Next Post: Purifier wrote:How are people still not understanding that this is an Index problem?
The Index is not the final form of your army with all its small parts represented. It is a stop gap, and removing these things is completely expected.
True, but I still want it back though. Like, now.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/18 20:35:29
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:36:05
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
MagicJuggler wrote:On another smaller note, I didn't get into 40k until 3rd so looking at 2nd edition, there are a lot of things that Chaos had which are no longer things.
Why can't Chaos Dreads take any combi-weapon of choice, being stuck with Combi-Bolters? How come Fabulous Bill no longer has varied profiles/different serums for his Xyclos Needler? The codex was so simple yet so comprehensive in making Chaos a truly distinct army, without relying on Dinobots or Princes.
Fabius did still have a variable statline until the abomination that was the 4th ed. codex. He certainly had variable ones in the 3 and 3.5 codexes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 20:39:11
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Purifier wrote:How are people still not understanding that this is an Index problem?
The Index is not the final form of your army with all its small parts represented. It is a stop gap, and removing these things is completely expected.
That doesn't preclude me from missing having rules for them at this moment does it? Thanks for chiming in though. Automatically Appended Next Post: BaconCatBug wrote: CthulhuDawg wrote: Do you have any examples off the top of your head? I'm genuinely curious as that never happened in our group.
The classic example is Nob Warbikers.
Explain please?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/18 20:41:21
“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 21:04:43
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Rules intend for you to remove whole models as you suffer wounds, this is to stop multiwound models keeping full fighting strength and spreading wounds around. In previous editions, you allocated wounds to "pools" based on models with identical wargar. Since you could make Nob Warbikers all different, this let you spread wounds around and keep your unit at maximum potency while other units were losing models and attacks. So say you have 5 Nobs with 2w each, normally taking 5 wounds would mean you've lose 2 Nobs and a whole bucket of attacks, but the wargear options meant you could spread them around and keep 5 wounded, but alive, Nobz.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/07/18 21:06:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 21:37:42
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Purifier wrote:How are people still not understanding that this is an Index problem?
The Index is not the final form of your army with all its small parts represented. It is a stop gap, and removing these things is completely expected.
Two points here:
1) We've no idea what will or won't be in the codices. So, whilst it's easy to say that the Indexes aren't the full rules, it's entirely possible that any non-artefact gear won't be coming back at all.
2) A lot of stuff has been removed from my armies *prior* to the index (hence, there's no reason to assume I'll get it back even when the main book drops).
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 21:43:12
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Honestly...no...not at all. Not even a little bit, and I think 8th has way too many.
The game never got better because of thousands of pieces of wargear...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 21:51:40
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
The index is probably just the space for those odd ducks they dont want to chuck into the codex main.
like the imperial space marine or the landraider exelcior or rhino primarus. that wont ever get a release again
possibly even the 30k stuff that has 40k rules like the characters and units in cat and tart armor.
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 21:53:17
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Stealthy Kroot Stalker
|
I play T'au, so these days, I just miss. A lot. ;P
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 22:09:40
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Poxed Plague Monk
san diego
|
I miss when witchblades were upgraded versions of force weapons.
I miss when the lasblaster was a damn good weapon.
I miss when the brightlance was a ranged weapon you could throw onto a character.
|
for 40k
skaven for fantasy. for the under empire!........but it isn't a game anymore.
for infinity |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 22:11:41
Subject: Re:Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Cothonian wrote:Inquisition used to be so cool... the Build-A-Bear workshop of Warhammer 40k.
Alas, now they have nothing to work with.
I'm crossing my fingers that when Inqusition, or Imperial Agents or whatever GW decides to call it this edition, comes along with it's codex GW tales the oppertunity to release some plastic inquistor kits with massive options, and redo your chocies as approperate
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/18 22:37:42
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
BaconCatBug wrote:Rules intend for you to remove whole models as you suffer wounds, this is to stop multiwound models keeping full fighting strength and spreading wounds around. In previous editions, you allocated wounds to "pools" based on models with identical wargar. Since you could make Nob Warbikers all different, this let you spread wounds around and keep your unit at maximum potency while other units were losing models and attacks. So say you have 5 Nobs with 2w each, normally taking 5 wounds would mean you've lose 2 Nobs and a whole bucket of attacks, but the wargear options meant you could spread them around and keep 5 wounded, but alive, Nobz.
That had more to do with previous wound allocation rules and not wargear though.
|
“Rumours are naught but lies given shape by the foolish tongues of the ignorant. Ignorance begets heresy. Heresy begets retribution.” -Regimental Standard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/19 01:25:04
Subject: Does anyone else miss the breadth of war gear options we used to have?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
I miss Vortex detonators on my tanks
|
koooaei wrote:We are rolling so many dice to have less time to realise that there is not much else to the game other than rolling so many dice. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|