Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 06:35:00
Subject: Re:Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Beast of Nurgle
new zealand timaru
|
BaconCatBug wrote: Melissia wrote: bullyboy wrote:so this works both ways yeah? Playing Dark Angels, I would now refer to the new codex for points values like powerfists, etc?
Yep. GW explicitly calls out DA, BA, and SW using the new codex's datasheets.
Wonderful. We've gone back to the 3rd edition Minidexes idiocy again.
Dont't believe that bullcrap as its completly untrue, BA, DW, and SW all can take the new units without needing the codex because GW specifically released a pdf with all points for the Prmaris stuff the non codex marines can use until they get their own codex, they only say that non codex players should buy the codex if they want all the new stuff in one place otherwise you need to buy the seperate models to get the unit info in the box's dataslate and have this pdf if you want to use them until they get teir own codex
https://www.games-workshop.com/resources/PDF/Downloads/K3ns3JDOGE2asjf/Primaris-week-4/IORF435R4_ENG_Primaris_Marines_Release_04_July_29th.pdf
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/07/29 06:44:44
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 06:42:22
Subject: Re:Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Which only helps for primaris marine units, not for things like cheaper power fists.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 06:51:59
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Beast of Nurgle
new zealand timaru
|
Sorry thought it was specifically meanin the new stuff
Id say there is a very good chance GW will release a faq for it we all know GW have been bloody good this edition
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 08:28:11
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
plagueknight wrote:Sorry thought it was specifically meanin the new stuff
Id say there is a very good chance GW will release a faq for it we all know GW have been bloody good this edition
One can only hope they do errata the indexes to keep parity with the codexes. Otherwise we're going to go back to the bad old days where Ultramarines had 12 man drop pods.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 08:34:29
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
Surfing the Tervigon Wave...on a baby.
|
the_scotsman wrote:
Which is why orks got Wazdakka and dark eldar got all their characters back!
Veteraan Sergeant Naaman
Brother Bethor
Moriar the Chosen
Captain Cortez
Chaplain Xavier
Funny thing is 4/5 of these had official models.
Wazdakka never did. Half the Dark Eldar characters never did.
It's hardly special treatment if your character with no model doesn't get shiny new rules....
|
Now only a CSM player. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 11:26:04
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
Can someone point me to which F&Q has the "use the index for old options" ruling in it?
Having looked at the Rule, Index Imperial 1 , Designers Commentary & Stepping in to a new edition F&Q's I can see this on any of them (may have just missed it)
Landspeeders, LS Storms any pretty much anyone on a bike have all been slashed from the new codex too.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 12:45:34
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
ScarVet101 wrote:Can someone point me to which F&Q has the "use the index for old options" ruling in it?
There is none
Just an Article on WC that states that Index Datasheets and Matched Play Points are replaced with Codex Datasheets and Matched Play Points as soon as they are out.
If a Datasheet is not replaced the Index one is still valid
But if you are using outdated/ OOP or converted models you are allowed to use the Index Datasheet for options that are not longer available with the codex point costs
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/07/05/codexes-your-questions-answered-july-5gw-homepage-post-2/
|
Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 12:48:29
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
Thanks Kodos
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/29 13:22:41
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
ScarVet101 wrote:
Landspeeders, LS Storms any pretty much anyone on a bike have all been slashed from the new codex too.
Speeders and storms are in there still, albeit with edited options.
You can still play bike-characters, using the index. For now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/07/30 04:45:44
Subject: Is it true Dreadnoughts are losing the autocannon option?
|
 |
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator
|
The first day I got my CSM index, with the help of post it notes, I wrote out the pts costs next to entries.
Once this is done, leas flipping back and forth....
Same applies to index use, and then codex use. I don't even need the index after that point.
Give it a try.
|
|
 |
 |
|