| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/08 23:16:29
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
So I was thinking the Ad-mech codex is pretty lame, I like it I'm not gonna sell my Ad-mech here. So my train of thought was removing the alphas from their squads and make them provide buffs kinda like how apothicaries were separated from command squads.
I haven't really thought it over too much maybe make them rerolls 1s to hit (free up the dominos to rerolls all misses instead of giving call a monopoly) or turn them into lieutenants and give them plus 1 to wound or rerolls 1s to wound.
Shove them into the elite slot. Maybe give different alphas different buffs
I think this would be pretty cool. Thoughts?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/10/08 23:38:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/09 00:29:33
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I think a Lieutenant role of letting Skitarii reroll some way to wound would be good.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/09 01:22:59
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
Yeah right now barring mars only the dominus gives rerolls
I'd much rather him give Plus one to hit to play off all of the "does X on 6s" in the codex
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/09 01:39:32
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
fraser1191 wrote:Yeah right now barring mars only the dominus gives rerolls
I'd much rather him give Plus one to hit to play off all of the "does X on 6s" in the codex
Yeah, that's way more powerful. Plasma anyone?
|
Clocks for the clockmaker! Cogs for the cog throne! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/09 01:43:23
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
JNAProductions wrote: fraser1191 wrote:Yeah right now barring mars only the dominus gives rerolls
I'd much rather him give Plus one to hit to play off all of the "does X on 6s" in the codex
Yeah, that's way more powerful. Plasma anyone?
Maybe make the dominus a little more expensive and that overlapping buffs don't stack
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/10/09 02:09:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/10/09 03:57:59
Subject: Moving Skitarii Alphas
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
fraser1191 wrote:Yeah right now barring mars only the dominus gives rerolls
I'd much rather him give Plus one to hit to play off all of the "does X on 6s" in the codex
I can live with this. Or you could do a whole thing that the MT have going on in their own detachment. A roll of 6 to hit gives another shot?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|