Switch Theme:

Multi-Damage Weapons & Disgusting Resilience  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Dakka Veteran





Can someone verify if I'm being told this correctly?

Example:

Captain in gravis armor attacks Lord of Contagion with power fist/one with the bolter attached to it. 3 of the 5 attacks hit & wound. Now despite the power fist dealing D3 wounds, first the Lord of Contagion makes 3 4+ invul saves. Then the D3 wounds are determined? Then the Lord of Contagion makes a disgusting resilience save equal to the D3 wound total?

That doesn't seem right. Shouldn't the D3 wounds be determined immediately after hit/wounds? Then the Lord of Contagion would have to make 4+ saves equal to that number, then disgusting resilience saves equal to whatever was left?
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Disgustingly resilient rolls are made after the damage is multiplied. It's not a save like the old feel no pain, it's a way of negating wounds inflicted.

DFTT 
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






What you were told is correct.

Core rules, 3.4.4 and 3.4.5 detail when to roll saves and inflict damage. Damage causes the model to lose wounds, and Disgustingly Resilient happens when a model loses a wound.
   
Made in ca
Storm Trooper with Maglight




No, it makes much more sense that youd save for wounds instead of damage.
The first part is how it goes I believe, as that is how it makes the most sense logically and thematically

123ply: Dataslate- 4/4/3/3/1/3/1/8/6+
Autopistol, Steel Extendo, Puma Hoodie
USRs: "Preferred Enemy: Xenos"
"Hatred: Xenos"
"Racist and Proud of it" - Gains fleshbane, rending, rage, counter-attack, and X2 strength and toughness when locked in combat with units not in the "Imperium of Man" faction.

Collection:
AM/IG - 122nd Terrax Guard: 2094/3000pts
Skitarii/Cult Mech: 1380/2000pts
Khorne Daemonkin - Host of the Nervous Knife: 1701/2000pts
Orks - Rampage Axez: 1753/2000pts 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





 Cheexsta wrote:
What you were told is correct.

Core rules, 3.4.4 and 3.4.5 detail when to roll saves and inflict damage. Damage causes the model to lose wounds, and Disgustingly Resilient happens when a model loses a wound.


Ok, so lets use another example to make sure I am understanding this correctly.

A squad of 5 hellblasters all overcharge rapid fire at Lord of Contagion. All hit & wound for a total of 10 wounds.

First he makes 10 4+ invul saves.

Lets say he makes 5.

Now the D2 damage comes into effect. So the 5 that got through = 10 lost wounds. Which he would then make 10 disgusting resilience saves. Is this correct?

   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






Correct.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Though it's best not to think of Disgustingly Resilient as a "save" - rather, it's just an ability that triggers when a wound is lost, which is very different to when a "save" is made.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/11/07 07:25:01


 
   
Made in us
Irked Necron Immortal




yes that is correct. The full way to determine damage is:

To-Hit
To-Wound
Save
Damage
Additional Saves like Disgusting resilience or other FNP like abilities.
   
Made in de
Experienced Maneater






 Commissar Benny wrote:
 Cheexsta wrote:
What you were told is correct.

Core rules, 3.4.4 and 3.4.5 detail when to roll saves and inflict damage. Damage causes the model to lose wounds, and Disgustingly Resilient happens when a model loses a wound.


Ok, so lets use another example to make sure I am understanding this correctly.

A squad of 5 hellblasters all overcharge rapid fire at Lord of Contagion. All hit & wound for a total of 10 wounds.

First he makes 10 4+ invul saves.

Lets say he makes 5.

Now the D2 damage comes into effect. So the 5 that got through = 10 lost wounds. Which he would then make 10 disgusting resilience saves. Is this correct?



Yes.
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





 Cheexsta wrote:
Correct.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Though it's best not to think of Disgustingly Resilient as a "save" - rather, it's just an ability that triggers when a wound is lost, which is very different to when a "save" is made.


Thanks gentlemen. Yeah I think that was the source of my confusion. Going forward I'll try not to think of disgustingly resilient as a save and more of an ability.

BomBomHotdog wrote:
yes that is correct. The full way to determine damage is:

To-Hit
To-Wound
Save
Damage
Additional Saves like Disgusting resilience or other FNP like abilities.


I'm going to write this down. Good resource.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/11/07 07:37:54


 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Worth noting that you still have to multiply wounds for single wound models. Normally you would ignore this step, but you cant if you have a damage negating ability as have to make your rolls against every point of damage.

DFTT 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: