Switch Theme:

Chapter approved and targeting characters  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot




Leeds UK

I haven't been able to find any discussions on this but other than the slight reword i see another potential change. The rule was boxed off in the shooting section previously but now it reads as a standalone rule. Does that mean the restrictions now apply for all phases?
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





The original wording wasn't simply boxed in the Shooting Phase portion of the rules, it stated "In the Shooting Phase".
   
Made in us
Norn Queen






The CA rule is somehow worse than the original. I expect basically nobody is going to use it.


These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

The new rule is in addition to the Core Rules and states 'the firer' a couple of times, so is clearly still a Shooting Phase rule. It's a modification of the existing rule.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Damsel of the Lady




That's an interesting theory, but since it's in CA and not a reprint of the entire Core Rules, I wouldn't put too much weight on it's location/boxed-nature.
   
Made in us
Never Forget Isstvan!






It's an official change to the BRB character targeting rules published by Games workshop. You can house rule it however you want, but expect to use it as it is at any tournament or in games with people outside of your personal gaming group.

The only contention with it atm is whether or not they meant to take the "wounds characteristic" out and just mean current wounds (pretty sure its just a mistake on their part).

Other than this its pretty straight forward. You can now no longer target 9 wound or less characters with shooting unless they are the closest model in any phase.

JOIN MY CRUSADE and gain 4000 RT points!
http://www.eternalcrusade.com/account/sign-up/?ref_code=EC-PLCIKYCABW8PG 
   
Made in us
Norn Queen






 Eihnlazer wrote:
It's an official change to the BRB character targeting rules published by Games workshop. You can house rule it however you want, but expect to use it as it is at any tournament or in games with people outside of your personal gaming group.

The only contention with it atm is whether or not they meant to take the "wounds characteristic" out and just mean current wounds (pretty sure its just a mistake on their part).

Other than this its pretty straight forward. You can now no longer target 9 wound or less characters with shooting unless they are the closest model in any phase.


Regardless of LoS. So a single model that is closer but behind a wall and not visible will prevent you from shooting a character that is visible and otherwise the closest.

There is exactly 0% chance anyone I have ever played with will be using that rule.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/14 20:34:01



These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
 
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

Well it will become a rule in tournaments, so unless you only play casual then you will have to learn to play around it.

I'm not sure I like it, but we'll see.

 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Page 67 – Matched Play Mission Rules,
Targeting Characters
Change the first sentence to read:
‘An enemy Character with a Wounds characteristic
of less than 10 can only be chosen as a target in the
Shooting phase if it is both visible to the firer and it is
the closest enemy model to the firer.’

Fixed in the new Chapter Approved FAQ. Thank the gods no-one wasted any time claiming it was based on remaining Wounds, eh?

https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/warhammer_40000_chapter_approved_2017_en-1.pdf

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/12/15 17:57:46


 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch




Clarity is key!
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Jacksmiles wrote:
Clarity is key!


Agreed!

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator





Also, the character targeting doesent exactly replace anything, it supplements it. It's not an errata, or a rewrite, it's an additional rule with more detailing. And it might be matched play only (at work without book).
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

 Nightlord1987 wrote:
Also, the character targeting doesent exactly replace anything, it supplements it. It's not an errata, or a rewrite, it's an additional rule with more detailing. And it might be matched play only (at work without book).


It is as you describe. But apparently that kind of logical assessment gets you called names round here. ;-) Be careful lest you be burnt as a heretic!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/15 18:19:49


 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch




I didn't comment on it but I didn't actually catch where it said it was an addition and not a replacement in CA. Where is that? I ask because I'm doing all my books digital (Ipad enhanced versions) this edition and didn't see it, but I've only done one read-through on my ipad and I'm noticing that I'm missing more one first reads digitally than I do if I have a physical copy, so I have to look harder at some stuff I guess lol
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Jacksmiles wrote:
I didn't comment on it but I didn't actually catch where it said it was an addition and not a replacement in CA. Where is that? I ask because I'm doing all my books digital (Ipad enhanced versions) this edition and didn't see it, but I've only done one read-through on my ipad and I'm noticing that I'm missing more one first reads digitally than I do if I have a physical copy, so I have to look harder at some stuff I guess lol


It says in CA the new CA rules are additions for Matched Play.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch




 JohnnyHell wrote:
Jacksmiles wrote:
I didn't comment on it but I didn't actually catch where it said it was an addition and not a replacement in CA. Where is that? I ask because I'm doing all my books digital (Ipad enhanced versions) this edition and didn't see it, but I've only done one read-through on my ipad and I'm noticing that I'm missing more one first reads digitally than I do if I have a physical copy, so I have to look harder at some stuff I guess lol


It says in CA the new CA rules are additions for Matched Play.


Cool, thanks, I'll look for it when I get home at the start of the Matched Play section.
   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






As per "Beta rules"
"An enemy character with a Wounds characteristic of less than 10 can only be chosen as a target in the Shooting phase if it is both visible to the firing model and it is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. Ignore other enemy characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10 when determining if the target is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. This means that if any other enemy units (other than other characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10) are closer, whether they are visible or not, then the enemy character cannot be targeted"

Still doesn't address the CA rule issue with LOS'ed non-characters units prohibiting shots made to the closest visible model that is a character.

You won't be able to target a character that is visible, 3" away if you have a non-character 2" away without LOS.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/15 21:34:01


 
   
Made in us
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch




 skchsan wrote:
As per "Beta rules"
"An enemy character with a Wounds characteristic of less than 10 can only be chosen as a target in the Shooting phase if it is both visible to the firing model and it is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. Ignore other enemy characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10 when determining if the target is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. This means that if any other enemy units (other than other characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10) are closer, whether they are visible or not, then the enemy character cannot be targeted"

Still doesn't address the CA rule issue with LOS'ed non-characters units prohibiting shots made to the closest visible model that is a character.


Guess that would be an intended change then.
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

 skchsan wrote:
As per "Beta rules"
"An enemy character with a Wounds characteristic of less than 10 can only be chosen as a target in the Shooting phase if it is both visible to the firing model and it is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. Ignore other enemy characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10 when determining if the target is the closest enemy unit to the firing model. This means that if any other enemy units (other than other characters with a Wounds characteristics of less than 10) are closer, whether they are visible or not, then the enemy character cannot be targeted"

Still doesn't address the CA rule issue with LOS'ed non-characters units prohibiting shots made to the closest visible model that is a character.

You won't be able to target a character that is visible, 3" away if you have a non-character 2" away without LOS.


The discussions were about previous wording, now completely clarified. Discussing the beta rule is a new discussion and should have a new thread.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in de
Witch Hunter in the Shadows



Aachen

Glad they fixed the wording as expected. Also glad it was an errata, not an FAQ entry *winks at Johnny*
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

nekooni wrote:
Glad they fixed the wording as expected. Also glad it was an errata, not an FAQ entry *winks at Johnny*


Hey, it was blatantly obvious before and it's inescapably obvious now. Incidentally, I hear they have a special on Humble Pie in Bugman's today...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/15 23:53:01


 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

Wounds characteristic means the wounds the model starts with not most current.

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in de
Witch Hunter in the Shadows



Aachen

 JohnnyHell wrote:
nekooni wrote:
Glad they fixed the wording as expected. Also glad it was an errata, not an FAQ entry *winks at Johnny*


Hey, it was blatantly obvious before and it's inescapably obvious now. Incidentally, I hear they have a special on Humble Pie in Bugman's today...

Hey, i never claimed it was intentionally changed or should be played that way, just that it was changed and that the changed rule worked differently than the rule before, and apparently GW thought the same or it would've been just an FAQ

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/16 08:08:51


 
   
Made in gb
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought





I still say they need to scrap the whole rule in favour of something like:
In the Shooting Phase, CHARACTERS that are within 6" of a friendly non-CHARACTER unit may not be chosen as that target of any of a units shooting attacks unless the unit is also within 6" of the character.

Minimises the stupidity of a character being 12" away on the far side of your unit from the nearest other enemy which is 11" away, with the shooting unit between them and the character.

Or something like:
CHARACTERS can only be the target of shooting attacks if the distance between them and the shooting unit is less than the distance between them and any friendly unit within LoS and range of the shooting unit.

Nearly the same as the original rule with no arbitrary range limit but makes it impossible to hide behind enemies the opponent can’t see and also eliminates the “polar opposition” scenario.

"Three months? I'm going to go crazy …and I'm taking you with me!"
— Vala Mal Doran
 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

 Mr_Rose wrote:
I still say they need to scrap the whole rule in favour of something like:
In the Shooting Phase, CHARACTERS that are within 6" of a friendly non-CHARACTER unit may not be chosen as that target of any of a units shooting attacks unless the unit is also within 6" of the character.

Minimises the stupidity of a character being 12" away on the far side of your unit from the nearest other enemy which is 11" away, with the shooting unit between them and the character.

Or something like:
CHARACTERS can only be the target of shooting attacks if the distance between them and the shooting unit is less than the distance between them and any friendly unit within LoS and range of the shooting unit.

Nearly the same as the original rule with no arbitrary range limit but makes it impossible to hide behind enemies the opponent can’t see and also eliminates the “polar opposition” scenario.


Send it to the new FAQ email address so GW can consider it.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Mr_Rose wrote:
I still say they need to scrap the whole rule in favour of something like:
In the Shooting Phase, CHARACTERS that are within 6" of a friendly non-CHARACTER unit may not be chosen as that target of any of a units shooting attacks unless the unit is also within 6" of the character.

Minimises the stupidity of a character being 12" away on the far side of your unit from the nearest other enemy which is 11" away, with the shooting unit between them and the character.


This is almost exactly what I was going to suggest, except I was going to suggest 2" instead of 6". This makes it more like they have 'joined' the unit without actually being part of it.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: