Switch Theme:

Stratagem Cognis Heavy Stubbers + Relentless Advance = ?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps




Phoenix, AZ, USA

The Stratagem Cognis Heavy Stubbers allows the Heavy Stubbers in a Questor Mechanicus Detachment to shoot after advancing at a -2 to hit, however, the Relentless Advance Household tactic (Raven) makes heavy weapons count as Assault Weapon when you Advance and shoot at no penalty.

So, which is it? A -2 to hit or no penalty? Or is it -2 to hit yet fire Overwatch at normal BS?

Let’s discuss.

SJ

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

If one rule lets you shoot at no penalty, and another rule gives them a penalty, then clearly they shoot at no penalty.

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in gb
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel





Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!

Why would you use the stratagem if you had that Knightly house?

Ghorros wrote:
The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
 Marmatag wrote:
All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors.
 
   
Made in nz
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




Ankh Morpork

You're entitled to ignore the penalty for Advancing and firing Assault weapons as per the House Raven tradition, but Cognis Heavy Stubber applies its own -2 penalty which isn't the penalty for Advancing and firing Assault weapons, so can't be ignored.

Looks like GW either worded it poorly or didn't think out the interaction here, so perhaps one for the next round of FAQ/errata.
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Just... don’t play the Stratagem, as others have suggested?

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

 Mr. Shine wrote:
You're entitled to ignore the penalty for Advancing and firing Assault weapons as per the House Raven tradition, but Cognis Heavy Stubber applies its own -2 penalty which isn't the penalty for Advancing and firing Assault weapons, so can't be ignored.
This assertion is not correct.

The Relentless Advance Household tactic (Raven) makes heavy weapons count as Assault Weapon when you Advance and shoot at no penalty.

therefore the weapons are considered assault and are shot at no penalty.

The Stratagem applies a penalty right?

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins





Tacoma, WA, USA

I'm pretty sure that Household Tradition allows them to fire without the -1 To Hit Penalty Assault Weapons normally suffer when Advancing. No impact on any other To Hit penalties.

Ultimately, it is a case of "Why would you use the Stratagem when you can already shoot the Heavy Stubber with no penalty to Hit?"
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps




Phoenix, AZ, USA

Probably because the Stratagem also specifies that Knights with the Relentless Advance trait also get the re-roll failed to hits.

It’s a complex Stratagem, for sure.

SJ

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





This sounds similar to the stormboys ability and the waagh ability issue. Stormboys can advance and charge but if they do then they take d3 mortal wounds. Being within 6" of a warboss lets you waagh which lets you advance and charge. So if the stormboys are within 6 which role do they use? Do they get to advance and charge penalty free or do they take mortal wounds? Most people played it that they get to use the waagh. However some people stated that you can't ignore the d3 mortal wounds on the stormboy datasheet. Ultimately gw ruled that waagh overrode the storm boy rule. Im inclined to say that because of the ability granting no negative to hit modifier, this rule overrides the -2 from the stratagem
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

 alextroy wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Household Tradition allows them to fire without the -1 To Hit Penalty Assault Weapons normally suffer when Advancing. No impact on any other To Hit penalties."


Do you have any rules quotes that actually say that?

Because there is a rule stating that the Relentless Advance Household tactic (Raven) lets you Advance and shoot at no penalty.

A -2 to hit from a strat is a penalty right?

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






As others have said: this is not a case of "GW didn't think about this interaction of rules".

It is more of a case of "This interaction should never come up".

If you are house Raven; Then you do not need to waste CPs on the Strategem.

If you are one of the other 3 Mechanicus households; Then you could use the strategem without conflict.

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: