Switch Theme:

Black Templars and Librarians  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Is it legal?
Yes
No

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Andykp wrote:
I think we all need to just accept that we can all play the game the way we enjoy and it’s fine. The guy asking the original question has an answer of the company who wrote the rule so that’s great. Everything else is just noise from random internet guys. Even if the forum doesn’t accept the answer as gospel that’s just dakka rules so there we go. Everyone’s happy.

Are you only saying that because you lost this debate?

Black Templar successors get to use Librarians. End of story. Any other interpretation is house rules, which isn't what this subforum is for.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




U.k

 Achetan wrote:
nekooni wrote:
Andykp wrote:
I think we all need to just accept that we can all play the game the way we enjoy and it’s fine. The guy asking the original question has an answer of the company who wrote the rule so that’s great. Everything else is just noise from random internet guys. Even if the forum doesn’t accept the answer as gospel that’s just dakka rules so there we go. Everyone’s happy.


So what exactly is the point of this board then?


Well i thought I could get an answer here and while this board was arguing I relized there may be away to just get an answer from GW directly.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 BaconCatBug wrote:
 Achetan wrote:
So I went to the Warhammer 40k official facebook following this sites guide for submitting an FAQ question. The answer that I got was that if I take black templar chapter tactics but I dont have the Black Templar key word I can use psykers but I cant take Grimaldus for example as he cant be anythimg except a Black Templar. Heres the post for more detail. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2177277475926213&id=1575682476085719&comment_id=2177428022577825¬if_t=feed_comment¬if_id=1542712649167576&ref=m_notif
Well [REDACTED] me with a [REDACTED], the Social Media Intern actually replied with a correct rules answer? That is indeed the correct answer (assuming you're pretending the Chapter Tactics work on non-Black Templar keyworded chapters).

Just as a heads up, Facebook and Emails aren't "allowed" here as per the Tenets (not trying to backseat moderate, just informing), and 95% of the time Facebook answers are wrong anyway.


If you say so. I just know that this website showed me how to get that answer. And its certaintly more concise then anything this board has given. So ill take the seal of aproval from the companies facebook page wich has tons of rules questions that they answer or let the community answer and then pin the correct ones when two opposing answers are given.


Very well put. At time this board is completely useless for someone who is genuinely looking for help as opposed to wanting to argue semantics.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Andykp wrote:
I think we all need to just accept that we can all play the game the way we enjoy and it’s fine. The guy asking the original question has an answer of the company who wrote the rule so that’s great. Everything else is just noise from random internet guys. Even if the forum doesn’t accept the answer as gospel that’s just dakka rules so there we go. Everyone’s happy.

Are you only saying that because you lost this debate?

Black Templar successors get to use Librarians. End of story. Any other interpretation is house rules, which isn't what this subforum is for.


No I’m saying it because even with that answer me and my group wouldn’t do that. Fluff matters too much to us. GW gave an official answer so I’m not going to disagree with them it’s their game. The ones saying the answer is invalid are the ones who agreed with it. But yes I would “house rule” it.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/11/23 22:40:28


 
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

SO... we seem to be done here.

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: