Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 03:51:08
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
As the title, what would you like to see in the pipe for 40K, whether it's a new faction, a new model for an existing faction or even new rules, campaigns or whatnot?
For me, I got one wish fulfilling with the recently revealed Skitari transport. However, if I had my choice, I would like to see a new Tau war engine - say a six-legged walker/transport armed with Tau plasma (or a railgun) and missiles. Of course, I wish GW would also get us plastic Eldar aspects as well.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/16 03:51:25
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 04:04:18
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Primaris Grey Knights or a new Grey Knight codex.
|
If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 04:09:57
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Emperor's Children codex and new plastic noise marines.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 04:11:39
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
40k rules for the 30k Mechanicum models. Plastic Aspect Warriors. A better partition between 40k and Apocalypse. My Corsairs back.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 04:13:29
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Lion El'Jonson and/or Leman Russ.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 04:47:02
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Kroot Codex
Necron fortifications
|
213PL 60PL 12PL 9-17PL
(she/her) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:01:58
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Khorne Daemonkin Codex. Other non-Heresy copy-&-paste Chaos factions. E.g. bringing back the old Crimson Slaughter Codex. Etc..
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:08:10
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
IIIrd legion codex & new marines.
SQUATS!!!!!!! But that is every year.
Mechanicus rules for Mechanicum units & more Admech in general.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:12:27
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator
|
2 years without any loyalist Space Marine models would be something I guess
Asdrubael Vect
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:22:39
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Ship's Officer
|
Plastic aspect warriors, a revamp/recut of the eldar guardians akin to what the tau firewarriors got. That kit needs a refresh,..also plastic spiritseer.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:36:56
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
Plastic aspect warriors.
New characters for Eldar and Harlequins.
New (or returned) characters for Dark Eldar.
A real DE Lord of War.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:39:24
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
ZergSmasher wrote:Lion El'Jonson and/or Leman Russ.
Leman Russ is already available via Forgeworld, albeit a little expensive (what isn't on FW) - https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-GB/Leman-Russ-Primarch-of-the-Space-Wolves
Personally, I'd rather see the primarchs left where they've always been, wherever that is (I forget what the fluff is about them). It's getting too much like The End Times/Age of Sigmar, what with the return of Robot Girlyman. I fully expect that, over the next few years, the rich tapestry that is and always has been the 40k that I've known and loved since the early 90s, will be butchered and made unrecognisable in the same way that Warhammer has been.
As for what I'd like from GW over the next 12 months? Difficult question as I'm not that greatly enthused about buying GW product at the moment, haven't been for a while, I might buy a model once a year now...
If I had to nail down some things I'd like to see -
Titans. As an affordable multi-option plastic kit, just because I have this weird yearning for a 40k scale titan but can't afford FW's eye watering prices for one (although I probably don't have display room for one either). Although given the price of Imperial Knight models I understand that the term affordable in conjunction with a Games Workshop product is rather at odds...
More focus on games such as Adeptus Titanicus where you can't already buy the models from existing ranges, not in the same scale at least, might be good if a new version of Epic was brought out...
New tooled plastic [insert Imperial Guard sub-faction here], especially Steel Legion, there's no variation in Imperial Guard anymore and the 'Nam jungle fighters were a laughably poor boxed set even when they were brand new.
Something original. Tau having been a good example of GW jumping on a bandwagon, gundam/anime anyone?! Something that isn't just a blatant excuse for a model range refresh, Primaris anyone?! Something that isn't a gateway product, basically a shill for the existing model range, Kill Team anyone?! (I'm sure the recent Warhammer Quest variants fit into that category also but I can't quite work out how). Basically anything that you can't immediately look at and find a blatantly obvious reason for it being there, just something they wanted to make for the sake of making it, which I know in business these days is a rare occurrence because everything has to tick a number of boxes and fit into x y or z pigeon hole in order to grab as much "market share" and "appeal to as wide a demographic" as possible, yada, yada, yada, yada, random business speak for justifying products, yada, yada, yada, yada look how inclusive our products are yada, yada, yada, yada...
A way of refreshing my 100-ish model 20 year old Dark Angels army with newer fresher models that won't see me having to take out a mortgage...
A less monopose models policy instituted. I've noted a trend in recent years, that whilst many of the new models, mostly characters on foot, are multipart, they're monopose. You put the model together, quite often in a push fit fasihon, and that's it, you can't do anything with them, some are even moulded in such a way that conversions become if not difficult, pointless, due to the amount of work required. For one thing it seems like a massive step backwards to the 90s and the days of metal, especially when you consider that monopose models are cheaper to make, but the cost to us has in fact risen!!
Can I mention cost? Be nice to see an end to the way above inflation (and my disposable income) price hikes...
Oh look a pig is hovering outside my window!
|
This message was edited 23 times. Last update was at 2019/05/16 06:52:20
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 05:40:07
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
|
CA and faq replaced with a simple rules pamphlet that gets replaced twice a year. This would contain all rules at their most recent iteration. It has to be cheap, like 10$ max. Seriously the bloat is at a point where it's almost impossible to resolve rules disputes.
|
Brutal, but kunning! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 06:10:05
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Walking Dead Wraithlord
|
A year without pandering to the imperium fanboys to see new units across other factions.. alright i might as well wish for a winning lotery ticket.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 06:38:14
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Mysterious Techpriest
Fortress world of Ostrakan
|
Mechanicum rules for 40k.
Some new Imperial Guard releases.
IG Veterans kit with options they had back in 7th or better.
Updated Infantry kit.
Rest of the IG range reviewed and made more viable to play, especially the FW stuff.
New non-humanoid Xeno faction or Men of Iron faction.
Fewer releases for Marines.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 06:51:32
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
|
Some Dark Eldar releases.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/16 06:51:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 07:11:12
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Gitdakka wrote:CA and faq replaced with a simple rules pamphlet that gets replaced twice a year. This would contain all rules at their most recent iteration. It has to be cheap, like 10$ max. Seriously the bloat is at a point where it's almost impossible to resolve rules disputes.
I actually like CA. The matched play rules updates currently total just one page so that's not really the cause of the bloat. CA also covers all of the points changes across all codexes. I agree that the FAQs are a mess, but I see those more as clarifications than something you need physical copies of during a game. Automatically Appended Next Post: As for what I want? I'm really looking forward to the new Chaos Knights codex. Model-wise I already have a backlog so no desires there.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/16 07:14:36
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 07:22:18
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
[MOD]
Villanous Scum
|
Inquisitors with an interesting array of options as well as a new Xenos race of any type (though non humanoid for preference).
|
On parle toujours mal quand on n'a rien à dire. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 07:53:37
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Finally fixing up the Fw index lists, releasing the plastic traitor guardsmen from BSF as multi part box.
|
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page
A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units."
Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?"
Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?"
GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!"
Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:18:15
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Zero power armour relaeases.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:39:53
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Gitdakka wrote:CA and faq replaced with a simple rules pamphlet that gets replaced twice a year. This would contain all rules at their most recent iteration. It has to be cheap, like 10$ max. Seriously the bloat is at a point where it's almost impossible to resolve rules disputes.
And what rules are you willing to see drasticly simplified to make this doable?
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:40:13
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
I want to see my favourite faction - Corsairs - actually get their rules back.
Seriously, it's beyond a joke at this point. If it was just working with Index rules that would be one thing but they've literally removed ~95% of Corsair units from the game altogether. And it's been like this for bloody years now.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:43:45
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Bring back Inquisitor Terminators!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:44:11
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Inquisition to get some serious love and be able to join their respective orders militant without breaking things.
Battlefield Gothic
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 08:48:25
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Xenos terrain kits.
Better terrain rules in general.
A new Nid bioform.
|
Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be
By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.
"Feelin' goods, good enough". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 09:27:30
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The Ordo Malleus ones are still in Index Imperium 2.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 09:52:06
Subject: Re:What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
vipoid wrote:I want to see my favourite faction - Corsairs - actually get their rules back.
Seriously, it's beyond a joke at this point. If it was just working with Index rules that would be one thing but they've literally removed ~95% of Corsair units from the game altogether. And it's been like this for bloody years now.
Yep, same show for many fw lists, DKoK got folded into one type, r&h lost 50% of it's troop choices.
Corsairs are just the the most extreme exemple.
|
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page
A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units."
Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?"
Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?"
GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!"
Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 09:53:46
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
A couple of pages written word to help explain what is needed to play the game, and what you need or dont need, and the reasons why this is. I mean a couple of pages explaining it in a way thats easy to understand for soem one who has a couple of brain cells, because i dont understand any thing at all.
Some one made a thread once here asking about if any ones feeling 40k fatigue , and i am feeling it, and always felt it, never till this day undesstood what is needed to play.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2019/05/16 10:05:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 09:59:29
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
For Eldar to get a BIG release chock full of updated sculpts and new models to use. I think of all the 40K armies they've got the most out of date at present and the age really shows on them.
I'd also love if GW really embraced their more exotic alien aspects in the designs - make them more orate and alien than just cone shaped helmets.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/16 10:05:38
Subject: What would you like to see for 40K in 2019-2020?
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
A new Astartes codex.
New AdMech codex.
I'd like to see at least 1 unique Primaris character for the codex chapters.
Also another loyalist Primarch. Keep the numbers even between the good guys and the bad guys.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/16 10:08:03
-~Ishagu~- |
|
 |
 |
|