Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2020/07/24 19:36:44
Subject: Planet 40k UPDATE Necron Royal Warden Review 9th Edition
Hey guys. Done a review on the channel on the new Skorpekh Destroyers. Would love your feedback. Will be doing the Skorpekh Destroyer Lord over the weekend
Just a kind reminder that we are a new channel looking to grow within the community. Would really appreciate any feedback.
We also do a bit of a "sit and talk" style video for anyone interested in that kind of thing while painting etc. Its called Warhammer Waffle which youll also find on the channel.
This message was edited 8 times. Last update was at 2020/08/20 17:26:13
I tend to go into general discussion by the most recent post, I'm already tired of hitting empty threads about videos.
Its a good way to turn people off rather than grow... viewer count
The alt switching to post various videos doesn't help who to avoid, either.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/24 20:23:22
Ghost Arks cannot transport anything but Warriors and Characters.
The presentation of damage was vague and the lack of comparison both in raw terms and in terms of value gained makes the whole damage thing useless.
I think it'd be nice if you had mentioned the command re-roll change in 9th and how that affects the danger of using their infusion ability.
Mentioning dynasties would be very important IMO, in full faction articles like on 1d4chan or Goonhammer you can get away with just mentioning once that Nephrekh is good for anything that can Advance and Charge, but when you are doing a video dedicated to one unit I feel like you really want to get into the nitty gritty.
I doubt they'll be 40 pts in 9th, 6 PL is 120 pts in 8th terms, which is 138 pts in 9th terms or about 46 pts. I was missing contrast between this unit, Wraiths, Destroyers, Heavy Destroyers and Lychguard. Maybe ignoring pts would be good for the longevity of the review, I'm not sure it's only a preview and we don't know for sure what the pts are so I think the video is kind of useless, not something I'd usually watch.
Production quality was nice mostly, good intro, I am not a fan of the punch sound effect when you rate something, but if you improved on the tactical value of the video I might have been interested in more despite that minor gripe. Good luck.
Voss wrote: Yeah, I'll actually agree with Kan on this one.
I tend to go into general discussion by the most recent post, I'm already tired of hitting empty threads about videos. Its a good way to turn people off rather than grow... viewer count
The alt switching to post various videos doesn't help who to avoid, either.
Noted thanks
Automatically Appended Next Post:
vict0988 wrote: Ghost Arks cannot transport anything but Warriors and Characters.
The presentation of damage was vague and the lack of comparison both in raw terms and in terms of value gained makes the whole damage thing useless.
I think it'd be nice if you had mentioned the command re-roll change in 9th and how that affects the danger of using their infusion ability.
Mentioning dynasties would be very important IMO, in full faction articles like on 1d4chan or Goonhammer you can get away with just mentioning once that Nephrekh is good for anything that can Advance and Charge, but when you are doing a video dedicated to one unit I feel like you really want to get into the nitty gritty.
I doubt they'll be 40 pts in 9th, 6 PL is 120 pts in 8th terms, which is 138 pts in 9th terms or about 46 pts. I was missing contrast between this unit, Wraiths, Destroyers, Heavy Destroyers and Lychguard. Maybe ignoring pts would be good for the longevity of the review, I'm not sure it's only a preview and we don't know for sure what the pts are so I think the video is kind of useless, not something I'd usually watch.
Production quality was nice mostly, good intro, I am not a fan of the punch sound effect when you rate something, but if you improved on the tactical value of the video I might have been interested in more despite that minor gripe. Good luck.
Thank you for this. dam that was an oversite with the ghost ark.
The dynasties i left out for a future video but I could touch on them in future. With a new codex dropping soon and a few changes to the dynasties i thought it would do more harm adding them currently.
Points costs are approx as they are not released.
We are still new and tweeking out errors and making improvements so I hope you can forgive the bumps in the road.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/24 20:43:11
Planet 40k
2020/07/26 18:27:54
Subject: Re:Planet 40k UPDATE Necron Skorpekh LORD Review 9th Edition
