Switch Theme:

Large discrepancy between points and power levels  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in pl
Fixture of Dakka




nekooni 790472 10881704 wrote:
And the whole notion of "well the codex will fix it" is just insulting, to be honest. Those books will have a section with updated points, and for some armies their updates will be in a year. How can you honestly think that it's fine to feth up their points for a whole year just because you can't be arsed to put at least SOME effort into the field manual? And how could you defend that decision as a player / playtester

In 8th I learned that the chain of codex will fix it, errata will fix it, CA will fix it is a never ending one, and in general does not fix a darn thing. If GW makes bad rules, you need new good rules, not them trying to fix bad stuff.

If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. 
   
Made in ch
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





Karol wrote:
nekooni 790472 10881704 wrote:
And the whole notion of "well the codex will fix it" is just insulting, to be honest. Those books will have a section with updated points, and for some armies their updates will be in a year. How can you honestly think that it's fine to feth up their points for a whole year just because you can't be arsed to put at least SOME effort into the field manual? And how could you defend that decision as a player / playtester

In 8th I learned that the chain of codex will fix it, errata will fix it, CA will fix it is a never ending one, and in general does not fix a darn thing. If GW makes bad rules, you need new good rules, not them trying to fix bad stuff.


But karol, fixing the stuff makes money, because you need to buy more rules.
Rules printed in china, with a margine that makes cigarette smugglers look like saints

https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/766717.page
A Mostly Renegades and Heretics blog.
GW:"Space marines got too many options to balance, therefore we decided to legends HH units."
Players: "why?!? Now we finally got decent plastic kits and you cut them?"
Chaos marines players: "Since when are Daemonengines 30k models and why do i have NO droppods now?"
GW" MONEY.... erm i meant TOO MANY OPTIONS (to resell your army to you again by disalowing former units)! Do you want specific tyranid fighiting Primaris? Even a new sabotage lieutnant!"
Chaos players: Guess i stop playing or go to HH.  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: