These are the important lines:
"Models that are on or within an Area Terrain feature with this trait do not suffer this penalty
if the only terrain feature these lines pass over or through is the terrain feature that the attacking model is on or within."
"Models within 3" of an Obstacle terrain feature with this trait do not suffer this penalty
if the only terrain feature these lines pass over or through is the terrain feature that the attacking model is within 3" of."
Emphasis mine, this is what BCB and Canadian 5th have picked up on. The parts of the rule that nullify the -1, specify that that piece of Dense Cover must be the
only terrain feature the line goes through. So per
RAW, BCB is correct.
Dandelion wrote:Reread the previous sentence. You only subtract if you draw a line through any Dense terrain, except the Dense terrain you are on.
Not quite what that previous line says I'm afraid. It says you ignore the terrain you're on if that's the only terrain feature the line passes over.
Dandelion wrote:I read it as the terrain needing the Dense keyword. “Terrain with this trait” = “Dense terrain” being integral to the interpretation. The second sentence only provides the exception such that occupied terrain doesn’t affect the occupying unit.
That's adding a qualifier that isn't there, though. It doesn't say "the only terrain feature with the Dense Cover trait", it says "the only terrain feature", period. House rule it that way if you want, and it may not have been the intent (and may indeed be
FAQ'ed), but right now the
RAW is pretty clear to me.